PF(Project Financing) is a combination with collective investment vehicle and has responded to various needs of the investors and the fund raisers. Despite remarkable growth of PF market, rare empirical analysis of PF real estate fund has been made th...
PF(Project Financing) is a combination with collective investment vehicle and has responded to various needs of the investors and the fund raisers. Despite remarkable growth of PF market, rare empirical analysis of PF real estate fund has been made through systematic accumulation of materials. It is because the loan has been made in line with the credit enhancement without systematic management and feedback of PF related empirical materials. After the financial crisis, the financial authorities prepared the system to manage and supervise the current state of PF sites in each financial division due to the drastic increase of PF default ratio. And, if some more materials like this are accumulated, it can be used as the decision making indicator for such numerous interested parties as the dealers of collective investment vehicles who manage the funds through empirical analysis, the borrowers, and the lenders(investors).
This study was initiated from the curiosity that what kind of characteristics PF real estate fund which accompanies relatively high cost structure against the general PF would reveal in the respect of rate of return comparing to the general PF financing method, and that how much the management capability of the fund management company would affect the rate of return of PF real estate fund. Empirical analysis was made for the factors affecting the rate of return of PF real estate fund according to the characteristic of the fund and its management company and that of development project, however, most of the variables failed to adopt the characteristic of the management company in the process of model establishment. This means a great number of fund management companies could not exhibit the management ability of risk management during the period of financing arrangement and operation in PF market and showed indirectly they could not overcome the passive role of simply providing the vehicle.
This study generated the variables affecting the rate of return of PF real estate fund and expected them to be able to contribute for the enhancement of management capability of the management company. And it also expected them to be used for the lenders(investors) as the investment decision making indicators that should consider the characteristic of PF real estate fund rate of return and, for the borrowers(financial consumers), as the indicators to choose alternative fund raising method for the development project. In spite of such a wish, it learned a great deal of limitations set aside contrary to the initial expectation.
It is estimated that this study is not to suggest the determinant model of PF real estate fund rate of return but to offer various possibilities for the future studies of next generation. From now on, it is expected that this study will be able to offer great efficiency in the aspect of decision making and business operation regarding the establishment of PF real estate fund through systematic materials accumulation and more sophisticated empirical analysis model.