RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    현행 농지법상 농지의 효율적 이용을 위한 개선방안 연구 = A Study on the Efficient Utilization of Farmland Under the Current Farmland Act

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The current Farmland Act aims not only to efficiently use and manage both regulations (relating to the ownership, utilization and conservation of farmland) and farmlands, help farmers manage steadily and improve productivity, but also to contribute to balanced development of national economy through competitiveness reinforcement over farmland and environmental preservation of national land.
    However, following are the problems of the current Farmland Act, which are being pointed out during operation.
    First, the total areas of farmlands continue to decline and the basis of food production collapses, which leads Land to the Tiller to lose effect and food sovereignty of the people to be at risk – that is to say, a decrease in farmlands is damaging public interest in farmland conservation.
    And farmlands are being possessed more by non-farmers, not farmers – that is to say, speculation and property increase (not crop cultivation) become part of purpose of use of farmlands, as there are increasingly large numbers of absentee farmers.
    Moreover, speculation on the farmland produces transfer gains for farmland followed by a drop in agricultural production, further imposing a heavy burden even on the whole national food security. And farmlands are exclusively used without a permit, and even some whose permit for exclusive use has been given are illegally used, i.e. not being used for the purpose or being used with exceeded area. On top of that, punishment against farmland ownership of non-farmers and illegal exclusive use for farmland is too weak.
    Following are an improvement plan on problems of the Farmland Act above.
    First, a systematic complement is required for a stable life of farmers, i.e. appropriate farmland securement for observing Land to the Tiller, appropriate lease for farmland’s efficient utilization, and farmland’s management by public sector.
    And farmers’ qualifications needed for farm management should strictly be readjusted, and farmland ownership of non-farmers should severely be restricted.
    To prevent speculation on the farmland, the qualifying certificate of the farmland-acquisition and land dealing permission system and more should be implemented. If such speculation is caught, it should be rooted out through application of the better recapture system and heavy imposition of transfer tax, etc. Furthermore, as for diversion of farmland, a land use plan should be established and the consultation on diversion of farmland should be complete in cases where the permit or license needs to be issued. A prime farmland should be excluded and a measure of restoration and strict punishment against illegal exclusive use for farmland are necessary.
    Last but not least, strict legal limitations on farmland ownership and speculation of non-farmers and illegal exclusive use for farmland are required to secure actual effect of the Farmland Act.
    번역하기

    The current Farmland Act aims not only to efficiently use and manage both regulations (relating to the ownership, utilization and conservation of farmland) and farmlands, help farmers manage steadily and improve productivity, but also to contribute to...

    The current Farmland Act aims not only to efficiently use and manage both regulations (relating to the ownership, utilization and conservation of farmland) and farmlands, help farmers manage steadily and improve productivity, but also to contribute to balanced development of national economy through competitiveness reinforcement over farmland and environmental preservation of national land.
    However, following are the problems of the current Farmland Act, which are being pointed out during operation.
    First, the total areas of farmlands continue to decline and the basis of food production collapses, which leads Land to the Tiller to lose effect and food sovereignty of the people to be at risk – that is to say, a decrease in farmlands is damaging public interest in farmland conservation.
    And farmlands are being possessed more by non-farmers, not farmers – that is to say, speculation and property increase (not crop cultivation) become part of purpose of use of farmlands, as there are increasingly large numbers of absentee farmers.
    Moreover, speculation on the farmland produces transfer gains for farmland followed by a drop in agricultural production, further imposing a heavy burden even on the whole national food security. And farmlands are exclusively used without a permit, and even some whose permit for exclusive use has been given are illegally used, i.e. not being used for the purpose or being used with exceeded area. On top of that, punishment against farmland ownership of non-farmers and illegal exclusive use for farmland is too weak.
    Following are an improvement plan on problems of the Farmland Act above.
    First, a systematic complement is required for a stable life of farmers, i.e. appropriate farmland securement for observing Land to the Tiller, appropriate lease for farmland’s efficient utilization, and farmland’s management by public sector.
    And farmers’ qualifications needed for farm management should strictly be readjusted, and farmland ownership of non-farmers should severely be restricted.
    To prevent speculation on the farmland, the qualifying certificate of the farmland-acquisition and land dealing permission system and more should be implemented. If such speculation is caught, it should be rooted out through application of the better recapture system and heavy imposition of transfer tax, etc. Furthermore, as for diversion of farmland, a land use plan should be established and the consultation on diversion of farmland should be complete in cases where the permit or license needs to be issued. A prime farmland should be excluded and a measure of restoration and strict punishment against illegal exclusive use for farmland are necessary.
    Last but not least, strict legal limitations on farmland ownership and speculation of non-farmers and illegal exclusive use for farmland are required to secure actual effect of the Farmland Act.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 채광석, "「농지법」상 예외적 농지소유 및 이용 실태와 개선과제" KREI 2019

    2 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2018

    3 김 욱, "헌법상 ‘경자유전’의 과도기적 소유원칙, 그발전적 이행을 위하여" 28 (28): 2000

    4 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 2019

    5 김운근, "통일대비 농림업부문 계획수립을 위한 연구" 한국농촌경제연구원 1998

    6 박용석, "토지법의 이론과 실무" 법원사 2006

    7 한국경제, "전체 농지 중 임대차 비율 50%인데… '경자유전' 내세워 처벌 강화한다는 정부"

    8 중앙일보, "작년 농지 '불법 전용' 3244건…처벌은 '솜방망이'"

    9 이뉴스투데이, "용인시, A반려견 놀이터…농지 불법전용 ‘덜미’"

    10 농민신문, "알쏭달쏭 농지제도 알아보기 (2)농지의 소유"

    1 채광석, "「농지법」상 예외적 농지소유 및 이용 실태와 개선과제" KREI 2019

    2 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2018

    3 김 욱, "헌법상 ‘경자유전’의 과도기적 소유원칙, 그발전적 이행을 위하여" 28 (28): 2000

    4 홍정선, "행정법원론(상)" 박영사 2019

    5 김운근, "통일대비 농림업부문 계획수립을 위한 연구" 한국농촌경제연구원 1998

    6 박용석, "토지법의 이론과 실무" 법원사 2006

    7 한국경제, "전체 농지 중 임대차 비율 50%인데… '경자유전' 내세워 처벌 강화한다는 정부"

    8 중앙일보, "작년 농지 '불법 전용' 3244건…처벌은 '솜방망이'"

    9 이뉴스투데이, "용인시, A반려견 놀이터…농지 불법전용 ‘덜미’"

    10 농민신문, "알쏭달쏭 농지제도 알아보기 (2)농지의 소유"

    11 연합뉴스, "비농업인 취득 농지 '깜깜이'…농지법 개정 필요성 제기"

    12 이창석, "부동산학 개론" 형설출판사 2010

    13 통계청, "보도자료, 2018년 경지면적조사 결과"

    14 김종선, "농촌문제 해결을 위한 사회적 혁신" 과학기술정책연구원 2014

    15 남선모, "농지활용의 범위와 효과에 관한 고찰 - 이용 및 전용을 중심으로 -" 한국법학회 (54) : 109-130, 2014

    16 류지웅, "농지제도의 법적 문제와 개선방안에 관한 연구 - 농지전용제도의 문제점과 개선방안을 중심으로 -" 한국토지공법학회 76 : 157-182, 2016

    17 이병기, "농지제도의 문제점: 이원화와 부조화 문제" 한국농촌지도학회 23 (23): 405-418, 2016

    18 박용석, "농지에 대한 법적규제" 한국토지법학회 1998

    19 경북매일, "농지법이 불법농지전용 부추겨"

    20 김병문, "농지법의 주요내용 및 주요쟁점에 관한 법적 검토" 한국농어촌사회연구소 (34) : 2004

    21 농축유통신문, "농지농용(農地農用)의 원칙’ 세워야"

    22 박석두, "농지 소유 및 이용구조의 변화와 정책과제" 농업기반공사 14 (14): 2004

    23 제주mbc, "농지 불법 개발 속출…솜방망이 처벌"

    24 농민신문, "농경지가 사라진다…10년간 서울 면적 1.6배 ‘증발’"

    25 민주언론시민연합, "국회의원이 농부? ‘농지 소유 실태’ 심층 해부한 한겨레"

    26 김수석, "경제사회여건 변화에 따른 농지제도 개편방안(1/2)" 한국농촌경제연구원 2008

    27 김진곤, "경자유전의 원칙과 소작제도금지의 헌법적 함의" 한국토지공법학회 38 : 103-121, 2007

    28 영남경제, "경북도내 농업법인 불법 농지취득 부동산 투기 성행…관리감독 허점 투성이"

    29 농수축산신문, "[사설]불법 임대농지 근절, 정부의 의지에 달렸다"

    30 농민신문, "[사설] 농가인구 감소와 농촌 고령화 심각 단계 넘었다"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.34 0.34 0.32
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.31 0.31 0.412 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼