In the meantime, many scholars insist that Goguryo era should be retraced for about 200 years based on the fact that the name of 'Goguryo prefecture' had existed at the time of the establishment of the 'Han's army', King Gwanggaeto have been mentioned...
In the meantime, many scholars insist that Goguryo era should be retraced for about 200 years based on the fact that the name of 'Goguryo prefecture' had existed at the time of the establishment of the 'Han's army', King Gwanggaeto have been mentioned as 17th descendants of in the Cemetery monument of King Gwanggaeto but they are recorded as 13 years old (or 12 years old) in the history and the history of Goguryo was recorded as 705 years despite the existence of the "Theory of 900 years nation".
However, systematic theories have not allowed us to criticize the beginning of the Goguryo era. On the other hand, Son Jong Young -North Korean- insists that Goguryo era starts at BC 277 through the research to find the cut 5th descendant.
However, Son Jong Young's theory has a lot of sympathy, but it has its own mistakes.
This study examines the previous theories and analyzes the problems of Son Jong Young's theory and suggests a systematic correspondence theory that the Goguryo regime started BC 217.
By deriving the early stage of Goguryo era, Goguryo was first established before the invasion of 'Han nation' and with the same vein 'Buyeo' it occupied a considerable area in Manchuria and proved to be a strong country of a wide area in the northern part of the Korean peninsula.
This fact can put an end to colonialists who insist on the presence of 'Han's army on the Korean peninsula.
In addition, the presence of the 'Han' Army is insignificant in Manchuria and not having a great influence on the territorial culture of Manchuria, so it proves that Manchurian cultural sovereignty belongs to the our ancestors.
The purpose of this study is to identify the territorial rights of Manchuria -a potential territorial dispute area- has to be attributed to our people by the cultural Territory theory.