RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      미납벌금의 대체형으로서 사회봉사명령의 도입 문제 -‘벌금미납자의 사회봉사명령집행에 관한 특례법안’에 대한 검토를 중심으로- = A problem of introduction community service order system as an alternative execution instead of imprisonment on the fine default

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Under the present law, a penalty defaulter works at a prison workshop within a given period. However, as the imprisonment for the punishment of failure to pay the penalty lead to unusual results of restoring imprisonment on the fine default just from the fine penalty that intended to avoid a short-term bad effect, people without economic strength end up with sentencing imprisonment on the fine default, and the defaulter rather favor a suspended sentence on imprisonment. Recently, after accepting criticism on regarding imprisonment on the fine default as the restoring execution, government submitted an exemption law to the National Assembly in order to introduce community service instead of imprisonment for the defaulter on economic grounds.
      The exemption law includes a procedure that a public prosecutor approves the community service applied by a penalty defaulter to execute a sentence to perform community service in advance of imprisonment. However, the exemption law asking approval of a public prosecutor is quite different comparing with previous suggestion intended to introduce community service order system as an alternative execution instead of imprisonment on the fine default. Nevertheless, a strong insistence on whether a public prosecutor or a court of justice approves it confronts each other.
      As mentioned above, the main point of theoretical and practical confrontation exists in whether community service is an alternative execution of fine penalty or a new restoring execution on the fine default. Considering foreign legislative examples and hands-on-background, several prior legislative managements that are not mentioned in the exemption law are prerequisite at least in understanding all of the exemption law procedures as implied in the exemption law. Even if that a public prosecutor admits and executes community service by a penalty defaulter according to the rules of the exemption law without prior legislative managements may be of advantage to the people without economic strength, changing a judicial decision without a court of justice being involved in the case will be unjust.
      Furthermore, rather than just introducing the community service order system as a restoring execution of imprisonment on the fine default, it needs to make decision on whether the exemption law is to be induced or not after taking everything into consideration, such as daily fines system, monthly installment of fines system, and suspended sentence system for fine penalty, which have been discussed as improvement plans.
      Currently, the Ministry of Justice proceeds to revise laws to improve the whole punishment system. Like the exemption law, rather than preparing for a special case for punishment law as an alternative mean of imprisonment, it will be an adequate scheme to make the purpose of legislation for the exemption law to be prescribed in penal code by investigating and connecting the legislative project to legal exchange work of the Ministry of Justice.
      번역하기

      Under the present law, a penalty defaulter works at a prison workshop within a given period. However, as the imprisonment for the punishment of failure to pay the penalty lead to unusual results of restoring imprisonment on the fine default just from ...

      Under the present law, a penalty defaulter works at a prison workshop within a given period. However, as the imprisonment for the punishment of failure to pay the penalty lead to unusual results of restoring imprisonment on the fine default just from the fine penalty that intended to avoid a short-term bad effect, people without economic strength end up with sentencing imprisonment on the fine default, and the defaulter rather favor a suspended sentence on imprisonment. Recently, after accepting criticism on regarding imprisonment on the fine default as the restoring execution, government submitted an exemption law to the National Assembly in order to introduce community service instead of imprisonment for the defaulter on economic grounds.
      The exemption law includes a procedure that a public prosecutor approves the community service applied by a penalty defaulter to execute a sentence to perform community service in advance of imprisonment. However, the exemption law asking approval of a public prosecutor is quite different comparing with previous suggestion intended to introduce community service order system as an alternative execution instead of imprisonment on the fine default. Nevertheless, a strong insistence on whether a public prosecutor or a court of justice approves it confronts each other.
      As mentioned above, the main point of theoretical and practical confrontation exists in whether community service is an alternative execution of fine penalty or a new restoring execution on the fine default. Considering foreign legislative examples and hands-on-background, several prior legislative managements that are not mentioned in the exemption law are prerequisite at least in understanding all of the exemption law procedures as implied in the exemption law. Even if that a public prosecutor admits and executes community service by a penalty defaulter according to the rules of the exemption law without prior legislative managements may be of advantage to the people without economic strength, changing a judicial decision without a court of justice being involved in the case will be unjust.
      Furthermore, rather than just introducing the community service order system as a restoring execution of imprisonment on the fine default, it needs to make decision on whether the exemption law is to be induced or not after taking everything into consideration, such as daily fines system, monthly installment of fines system, and suspended sentence system for fine penalty, which have been discussed as improvement plans.
      Currently, the Ministry of Justice proceeds to revise laws to improve the whole punishment system. Like the exemption law, rather than preparing for a special case for punishment law as an alternative mean of imprisonment, it will be an adequate scheme to make the purpose of legislation for the exemption law to be prescribed in penal code by investigating and connecting the legislative project to legal exchange work of the Ministry of Justice.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박미숙, "형사제재로서의 사회봉사명령의 의의와 전망" 한국형사법학회 (17) : 91-112, 2002

      2 김성돈, "형법총론" SKKUP 56-, 2008

      3 배종대, "형법각론," 홍문사 21-, 2006

      4 정진연, "집행유예제도의 개선방안" 숭실대학교 법학연구소 16 : 210-, 2006

      5 서보학, "집행유예제도 : 입법론적 비판과 대안" 한국형사정책학회 13 (13): 70-, 2001

      6 강동범, "재산형의 문제와 개선방향" 한국형사정책학회 (5) : 92-, 1990

      7 한영수, "유예제도의 개선방안 - 선고유예와 집행유예의 개선방안" 한국형사법학회 (22) : 590-, 2004

      8 장규원, "외국에서의 벌금미납자에 대한 사회봉사명령 운영에 관한 연구(1999년도 법무부 용역과제)"

      9 강호성, "사회봉사명령 집행프로그램의 효율화 방안" 한국형사정책연구원 263-, 1999

      10 이진국, "사회 내 제재수단의 도입 및 활성화방안"

      1 박미숙, "형사제재로서의 사회봉사명령의 의의와 전망" 한국형사법학회 (17) : 91-112, 2002

      2 김성돈, "형법총론" SKKUP 56-, 2008

      3 배종대, "형법각론," 홍문사 21-, 2006

      4 정진연, "집행유예제도의 개선방안" 숭실대학교 법학연구소 16 : 210-, 2006

      5 서보학, "집행유예제도 : 입법론적 비판과 대안" 한국형사정책학회 13 (13): 70-, 2001

      6 강동범, "재산형의 문제와 개선방향" 한국형사정책학회 (5) : 92-, 1990

      7 한영수, "유예제도의 개선방안 - 선고유예와 집행유예의 개선방안" 한국형사법학회 (22) : 590-, 2004

      8 장규원, "외국에서의 벌금미납자에 대한 사회봉사명령 운영에 관한 연구(1999년도 법무부 용역과제)"

      9 강호성, "사회봉사명령 집행프로그램의 효율화 방안" 한국형사정책연구원 263-, 1999

      10 이진국, "사회 내 제재수단의 도입 및 활성화방안"

      11 이천현, "벌금형집행의 문제점과 그 개선방안" 한국비교형사법학회 641-, 2006

      12 서보학, "벌금형제도 소고 : 비판과 입법론적 대안" 한국형사정책학회 (10) : 83-, 1998

      13 김종덕, "벌금형 집행율의 제고방안" 한국비교형사법학회 9 (9): 307-336, 2007

      14 박기석, "벌금형 개선방안" 한국형사정책학회 20-, 2000

      15 이주원, "벌금미납자의 사회봉사집행에 관한 특례법안에 대하여"

      16 최병각, "벌금미납자의 사회봉사집행에 관한 특례법안에 관한 의견진술요지서"

      17 임인규, "벌금미납자의 사회봉사 집행에 관한 특례법안 검토보고서"

      18 임인규, "벌금미납자의 사회봉사 집행에 관한 특례법안 검토보고서"

      19 신의기, "벌금미납자의 사회봉사 집행에 관한 특례법(안)에 대한 의견서"

      20 국회 법제사법위원회, "벌금미납자에 대한 사회봉사집행제도에 관한 공청회 자료집"

      21 정진연, "벌금미납자에 대한 사회봉사집행에 관한 특례법 제출배경과 사회봉사허가권자에 대한 검토의견"

      22 정현미, "벌금미납자에 대한 사회봉사명령제도 도입방안" 한국보호관찰학회 (4) : 184-, 2004

      23 고석홍, "벌금미납자에 대한 사회봉사명령 활용에 대한 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 251-, 1999

      24 한영수, "벌금미납자에 대한 노역장유치" 한국형사정책연구원 10 (10): 231-, 1999

      25 정현미, "미납벌금의 대제방안으로서 사회봉사명령" 법학연구소 4 (4): 47-61, 2000

      26 이완규, "개정형사소송법의 쟁점" 탐구사 360-, 2007

      27 이완규, "개정 형사소송법상 영장항고" (9) : 49-50, 2007

      28 정현미, "罰金刑의 改善方案" 한국비교형사법학회 6 (6): 205-218, 2004

      29 Tröndle, "StKB, 53. Aufl." 9-, 2006

      30 Kaiser, "Kriminologie, 3. Aufl." 1014-, 1996

      31 Wolters, "Der Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Reform des Sanktionenrechts" 114 : 63-, 2002

      32 BSK StGB-Barbara Amsler, "Art. 49 Rn. 4"

      33 "2008.11.27일 제278회 국회(정기회) 제20차 전체회의 회의록, 31면)"

      34 "2007.11.14일 제269회 국회(정기회) 제12차 전체회의 회의록, 12면, 14면 : 조순형 위원 질의내용)"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
      2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼