『신청년(新靑年)』의 신문학운동과 중국의 근대성 = The New Literary Movement of New Youth (LA JEUNESSE) and Chinese modernity

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Disposition and reconstitution of tradition’ can be an important These to understand Chinese modernity when China encountered the West, In a view from the New Culture Movement as a criticizing movement against the way of traditional Chinese thinking and cultural base, literature should not be a tool to convey traditional ideas. Thus, the movement featured ideological struggle to spread the idea of the new age instead of traditional thought. As inheritance given to the heritor with the right of succession and disposition, the leaders of the New Culture Movement criticized old and conventional literary tradition and extracted the essence from the tradition at the same time. They tried accepting the superiority of colloquial Chinese and strong point of the literary language. That is, they tried creating a model of new literature by granting justification of the existing literature in colloquial Chinese in history. They thought modern literature had to be the literature of both humans and liberation. First, they pursued lib from the form of letters and then the literature with liberal thought and emotional expression, which was to create a new type of human who valued the autonomousㆍliberalㆍ independent personality Chen Duxiu suggested. That is, the Colloquial Chinese Movement was an effort to create ‘modern subjectivities’. Modernity generally called as a result of modernization contains Western-centric prejudice. But today there appears quite a little reflection of the Western-centric modernity. The main These in discussion on Asian modernity is the way of ‘disposition of tradition’. Whether they dispose or stick to tradition can be crucial to define the modernity. Modernity can be a cultural and political planning or program for human or subjective constitution of the social order or way of life. The New Culture Movement as the pursuit of an autonomous and independent individual can be understood as the above mentioned. The ‘disposition of tradition’ the leaders of the New Culture Movement suggested was not all anti-traditional. They found the tradition which matched the new age from the past and created a new tradition instead. China made its new tradition in its way. In short, the modernity through a medium of Chinese intellectuals’ literary revolution in the period of the New Culture Movement was not all Western, but Chinese. The modernity included both universality and speciality at the same time. Thus, it can be said that Chinese modernity was to voluntarily renew and activate what is its own, not to just copy what is Western or conventionally Chinese.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이승환, "후기 유학담론이 두 유형 : 뚜웨이밍(杜維明)과 에임스(Roger Ames)를 중심으로" 36 : 1998

2 胡適, "호적문선" 삼성문화재단 1972

3 홍석표, "현대중국 단절과 연속" 선학사 2005

4 마샬 버번, "현대성의 경험" 현대미학사 2011

5 임현진, "한국의 근대와 근대성 비판" 역사비평사 2004

6 조셉 첸, "중국현대사의 구조" 청람 1983

7 溝囗雄三, "중국현대사의 구조" 청람 1983

8 이택후, "중국현대사상사의 굴절" 지식산업사 1992

9 민두기, "중국에서의 자유주의의 실험" 지식산업사 1997

10 송호근, "인민의 탄생" 민음사 2012

11 김상준, "유교의 정치적 무의식" 글항아리 2014

12 홉스봄, "역사론" 민음사 2004

13 지그문트 바우만, "액체근대" 도서출판 강 2010

14 김수연, "신청년의 신문학론" 한길사 2012

15 안토니오 디마지오, "스피노자의 뇌" 사이언스북스 2011

16 고병익, "동아시아의 전통과 변용" 문학과지성사 1996

17 임현진, "다중적 근대성의 탐구: 비교 문명적 관점" 나남 2009

18 윤여일, "내재하는 아시아" 휴머니스트 2011

19 김승욱, "공자 비판의 정치학 - 비림비공의 경우" 한국중국학회 51 : 323-350, 2005

20 陳獨秀, "陳獨秀著作選" 上海人民出版社 1993

21 胡適, "胡適文存" 遠東圖書公司 1975

22 毛澤東, "毛澤東選集, (2)" 人民出版社 1992

23 "新靑年" 汲古書院 1970

24 張頤武, "從現代性到中華性" 2 : 1994

25 백원담, "5ㆍ4는 반전통주의인가" 16 : 1999

26 임상범, "20세기 후반기 한국에서의 5ㆍ4운동 연구사" 중국근현대사학회 (64) : 247-289, 2014

27 久保 亨 外, "20世紀中國史,1" 東京大學出版會 2009