RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      후두현미경하 미세수술을 위한 외래마취 시 Propofol과 Remifentanil을 이용한 전 정맥마취와 Sevoflurane-N2O와 Alfentanil을 이용한 균형마취의 비교 = Comparision of Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Sevoflurane-N2O-Alfentanil Anesthesia for Laryngeal Microscopic Surgery

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104327887

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical properties of sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil with propofol- remifentanil anesthesia for patients undergoing laryngeal microscopic surgery.
      Methods: Sixty patients scheduled for elective ambulatory surgery received either total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA group) with remifentanil and propofol or balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil (sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil group). The TIVA group patients were induced with an effective-site concentration of 4μg/ml propofol and a bolus dose of 0.5μg/ml remifentanil. The anesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusions with an effective-site concentration of 2-5μg/kg propofol and 0.05-0.5μg/kg/min remifentanil, according to the hemodynamic response. The sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil group patients were induced with 5 mg/kg thiopental and 20μg/kg IV alfentanil. Maintenance was obtained with 1.5-3.0 vol% sevoflurane and a bolus dose of 10μg/kg IV alfentanil if needed. The anesthetic depth was controlled under bispectral index (BIS) monitoring: propofol and sevoflurane concentrations were adjusted to achieve target BIS values, and were between levels of 40-60 during surgery.
      Results: Both anesthetic methods provided acceptable hemodynamic responses during surgery. The late recovery times (postanesthetic discharge scoring system), patient satisfaction and postoperative side effects were similar between patients in the two groups. Early recovery times (eye opening and the aldrete score) were shorter in the TIVA group patients, but this difference was not associated with a shorter hospital length of stay.
      Conclusions: Total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil-propofol and balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil both provided satisfactory anesthesia for laryngeal microscopic surgery.
      번역하기

      Background: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical properties of sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil with propofol- remifentanil anesthesia for patients undergoing laryngeal microscopic surgery. Methods: Sixty patients scheduled for elective am...

      Background: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical properties of sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil with propofol- remifentanil anesthesia for patients undergoing laryngeal microscopic surgery.
      Methods: Sixty patients scheduled for elective ambulatory surgery received either total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA group) with remifentanil and propofol or balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil (sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil group). The TIVA group patients were induced with an effective-site concentration of 4μg/ml propofol and a bolus dose of 0.5μg/ml remifentanil. The anesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusions with an effective-site concentration of 2-5μg/kg propofol and 0.05-0.5μg/kg/min remifentanil, according to the hemodynamic response. The sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil group patients were induced with 5 mg/kg thiopental and 20μg/kg IV alfentanil. Maintenance was obtained with 1.5-3.0 vol% sevoflurane and a bolus dose of 10μg/kg IV alfentanil if needed. The anesthetic depth was controlled under bispectral index (BIS) monitoring: propofol and sevoflurane concentrations were adjusted to achieve target BIS values, and were between levels of 40-60 during surgery.
      Results: Both anesthetic methods provided acceptable hemodynamic responses during surgery. The late recovery times (postanesthetic discharge scoring system), patient satisfaction and postoperative side effects were similar between patients in the two groups. Early recovery times (eye opening and the aldrete score) were shorter in the TIVA group patients, but this difference was not associated with a shorter hospital length of stay.
      Conclusions: Total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil-propofol and balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-N2O-alfentanil both provided satisfactory anesthesia for laryngeal microscopic surgery.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited" 7 : 89-91, 1995

      2 "Sevoflurane titration using bispectral index decreases postoperative vomiting in phase II recovery after ambulatory surgery" 93 : 1165-1169, 2001

      3 "Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with propofol" 81 : 823-828, 1995

      4 "Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: a comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia" 90 : 168-174, 2000

      5 "Recovery characteristics of sevoflurane- or propofol-based anaesthesia for day-care surgery" 41 : 988-994, 1997

      6 "Propofol. An update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology 1994" 1005-43,

      7 "Measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil" 83 : 968-975, 1995

      8 "Hemodynamic changes according to the remifentanil effect site concentration for patients under total intravenous anesthesia during laryngeal microscopic surgery" 52 : 9-15, 2007

      9 "Fast-track eligibility of geriatric patients undergoing short urologic surgery procedures" 94 : 560-564, 2002

      10 "Fast-track eligibility after ambulatory anesthesia: a comparison of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol" 86 : 267-273, 1998

      1 "The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited" 7 : 89-91, 1995

      2 "Sevoflurane titration using bispectral index decreases postoperative vomiting in phase II recovery after ambulatory surgery" 93 : 1165-1169, 2001

      3 "Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with propofol" 81 : 823-828, 1995

      4 "Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: a comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia" 90 : 168-174, 2000

      5 "Recovery characteristics of sevoflurane- or propofol-based anaesthesia for day-care surgery" 41 : 988-994, 1997

      6 "Propofol. An update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology 1994" 1005-43,

      7 "Measured context-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil" 83 : 968-975, 1995

      8 "Hemodynamic changes according to the remifentanil effect site concentration for patients under total intravenous anesthesia during laryngeal microscopic surgery" 52 : 9-15, 2007

      9 "Fast-track eligibility of geriatric patients undergoing short urologic surgery procedures" 94 : 560-564, 2002

      10 "Fast-track eligibility after ambulatory anesthesia: a comparison of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol" 86 : 267-273, 1998

      11 "Fast track in the postanesthesia care unit: unlimited possibilities?" 8 : S 70-S72, 1996

      12 "Effects of alfentanil on the hemodynamic responses and recovery profiles during laryngoscopic surgery" 50 : 396-401, 2006

      13 "EEG quantitation of narcotic effect the comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil. Anesthesiology 1985" 234-41,

      14 "Comparison of sevoflurane-nitrous oxide and propofol-alfentanil-nitrous oxide anaesthesia for minor gynaecological surgery" 83 : 576-579, 1999

      15 "Comparison of sevoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia for day case urological surgery" 54 : 1002-1006, 1999

      16 "Clinical uses of fentanyl" 581-93,

      17 "Anesthesia technique for outpatient facial laser resurfacing" 34 : 269-272, 2004

      18 "Anesthesia for ambulatory surgery" Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1229-1243, 2006

      19 "A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery" 7 : 500-506, 1995

      20 "A comparison: the efficacy of sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or propofol-nitrous oxide for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia" 8 : 639-643, 1996

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼