RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      契約과 믿음: 그 政治經濟學的 意味의 再吟味 = Contract and Trust: A Reconsideration of Its Significance for Political Economy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108783587

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Much has been discussed on contract in conventional literature but to great extent much less on trust. This paper is attempted to enquire the significance of contract and trust for political economy and to interprete them in terms of moral philosophy. Some recognitions, based on the angle of social sciences of this study are as follows : Firstly, social contract was emerged and dominating in the western societies, whereas in the Eastern North Asian countries it was mostly introduced from the West. Instead of contract, in the Eastern North Asian region, conventionally and traditionally trust as social habit dominated. Secondly, trust is found to be a presupposing background for the social contract to be effectively performed. The latter as a legal conception presumes a moral convention that refers to trust, Otherwise, social contract remaims only in rhetoric. Thirdly, under the legal conception of social contract, individuals mostly seeking self-interest tend to behave in accordance with marginal interest so as to escape the legal sanction, To natural consequence, it results in many sorts of socially undesirable events, such as corruption, cheating, disqualified production and commodity, unjust link between politics and economics, and so on. All this kind of socially unjust behaviors prevailing in modern societies could be diminished by providing social trust with belief among different individuals and groups that would foster cooperation and agreement which is likely to function for effective social contract. Lastly but not least, on the basis of recognition that trust is of vital significance for political economy, we would suggest to provide with a morally benevolent market order, which is basically grounded on mutual belief and trust among different constituents of modern society. This kind of morally benevolent market order would be proposed as a prime normative value for the realization of successful globalization in the 21st century.
      번역하기

      Much has been discussed on contract in conventional literature but to great extent much less on trust. This paper is attempted to enquire the significance of contract and trust for political economy and to interprete them in terms of moral philosophy....

      Much has been discussed on contract in conventional literature but to great extent much less on trust. This paper is attempted to enquire the significance of contract and trust for political economy and to interprete them in terms of moral philosophy. Some recognitions, based on the angle of social sciences of this study are as follows : Firstly, social contract was emerged and dominating in the western societies, whereas in the Eastern North Asian countries it was mostly introduced from the West. Instead of contract, in the Eastern North Asian region, conventionally and traditionally trust as social habit dominated. Secondly, trust is found to be a presupposing background for the social contract to be effectively performed. The latter as a legal conception presumes a moral convention that refers to trust, Otherwise, social contract remaims only in rhetoric. Thirdly, under the legal conception of social contract, individuals mostly seeking self-interest tend to behave in accordance with marginal interest so as to escape the legal sanction, To natural consequence, it results in many sorts of socially undesirable events, such as corruption, cheating, disqualified production and commodity, unjust link between politics and economics, and so on. All this kind of socially unjust behaviors prevailing in modern societies could be diminished by providing social trust with belief among different individuals and groups that would foster cooperation and agreement which is likely to function for effective social contract. Lastly but not least, on the basis of recognition that trust is of vital significance for political economy, we would suggest to provide with a morally benevolent market order, which is basically grounded on mutual belief and trust among different constituents of modern society. This kind of morally benevolent market order would be proposed as a prime normative value for the realization of successful globalization in the 21st century.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序 Ⅱ. 契約의 思想的 特性 Ⅲ. 왜곡된 계약의 사회적 비용 Ⅳ. 믿음의 정치경제학적 의미 Ⅴ. 儒敎的 믿음에 기초한 資本主義秩序 Ⅵ. 결언 참고문헌 Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 序 Ⅱ. 契約의 思想的 特性 Ⅲ. 왜곡된 계약의 사회적 비용 Ⅳ. 믿음의 정치경제학적 의미 Ⅴ. 儒敎的 믿음에 기초한 資本主義秩序 Ⅵ. 결언 참고문헌 Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼