RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      조건부가치측정법을 이용한 공공건물의 무장애 시설 가치분석에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60139345

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Since improving accessibility standards or building barrier free buildings could be considered an inefficient and expensive solution, previous research conducted the U.S. U.K., and Japan etc. tried to prove benefits compared to the cost of building barrier free buildings. The purpose of this study are to find out attitude and opinions of people toward barrier free design features and to estimate the value of barrier free facilities. This research uses the Contingent Valuation Method to gain a direct appraisal of the benefits from barrier-free public facilities. For this purpose, survey method is used. Pre-test is conducted to establish the initial amount for the respondents. The degree of importance of barrier free features varies by each respondent group; general, elderly, and the disabled. A double bounded question method is used to estimate the amount of tax payment as the value for the barrier free public buildings. When considering public facilities with barrier free design features, the total of 636 respondents, including 190 the disabled respondents, 187 the elderly respondents that answered the direct 1:1 survey would have willingness to 18,560 Won per month as an additional tax for the barrier free design features. Among the respondents, people with disabilities showed higher amount for tax payment compared to the elderly and other respondent group.
      번역하기

      Since improving accessibility standards or building barrier free buildings could be considered an inefficient and expensive solution, previous research conducted the U.S. U.K., and Japan etc. tried to prove benefits compared to the cost of building ba...

      Since improving accessibility standards or building barrier free buildings could be considered an inefficient and expensive solution, previous research conducted the U.S. U.K., and Japan etc. tried to prove benefits compared to the cost of building barrier free buildings. The purpose of this study are to find out attitude and opinions of people toward barrier free design features and to estimate the value of barrier free facilities. This research uses the Contingent Valuation Method to gain a direct appraisal of the benefits from barrier-free public facilities. For this purpose, survey method is used. Pre-test is conducted to establish the initial amount for the respondents. The degree of importance of barrier free features varies by each respondent group; general, elderly, and the disabled. A double bounded question method is used to estimate the amount of tax payment as the value for the barrier free public buildings. When considering public facilities with barrier free design features, the total of 636 respondents, including 190 the disabled respondents, 187 the elderly respondents that answered the direct 1:1 survey would have willingness to 18,560 Won per month as an additional tax for the barrier free design features. Among the respondents, people with disabilities showed higher amount for tax payment compared to the elderly and other respondent group.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 문헌고찰
      • 3. 조사 방법
      • 4. 조사결과
      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 문헌고찰
      • 3. 조사 방법
      • 4. 조사결과
      • 5. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 백상근, "지하철 역사 Barrier-free 시설의 실태분석과 조건부가치측정법을 이용한 가치분석" 부산대학교 대학원 2008

      2 정헌영, "이중양분선택형 질문법을 이용한 CVM에 의한 지하철 역사 Barrier-free 시설의 가치분석" 대한교통학회 26 (26): 205-216, 2008

      3 건설성 건설정책연구센터, "배리어 프리화의 사회경제적 평가에 관한 연구" 2000

      4 Dunn, P.A, "The Impact of Housing upon the Independent Living Outcomes of Individuals with Disabilities" Brandeis University 1988

      5 Van der Voordt, T.J.M, "The Benefits of building barrier-free: a Contingent Valuation of accessibility as an attribute of housing" 2 (2): 25-44, 2002

      6 Alonso, F., "The Benefits of Building Barrier-Free: A Contingent Valuation of Accessibility as an Attribute of Housing" 2 (2): 25-44, 2002

      7 Frisch, J, "The Benefits of Accessible Buildings and Transport" Physical Disability Council of NSW

      8 Alberini. Anna, "Optimal design for discrete choice contingent valuation surveys: Single bound, double bound and bivariate models" 28 (28): 287-306, 1995

      9 Ś.wież.awska-Ambroziak, K., "Economical benefits of the design for all" 67-72, 2006

      10 Chollet, D., "A cost-benefit analysis of accessibility, Department of Housing an Urban development" 1979

      1 백상근, "지하철 역사 Barrier-free 시설의 실태분석과 조건부가치측정법을 이용한 가치분석" 부산대학교 대학원 2008

      2 정헌영, "이중양분선택형 질문법을 이용한 CVM에 의한 지하철 역사 Barrier-free 시설의 가치분석" 대한교통학회 26 (26): 205-216, 2008

      3 건설성 건설정책연구센터, "배리어 프리화의 사회경제적 평가에 관한 연구" 2000

      4 Dunn, P.A, "The Impact of Housing upon the Independent Living Outcomes of Individuals with Disabilities" Brandeis University 1988

      5 Van der Voordt, T.J.M, "The Benefits of building barrier-free: a Contingent Valuation of accessibility as an attribute of housing" 2 (2): 25-44, 2002

      6 Alonso, F., "The Benefits of Building Barrier-Free: A Contingent Valuation of Accessibility as an Attribute of Housing" 2 (2): 25-44, 2002

      7 Frisch, J, "The Benefits of Accessible Buildings and Transport" Physical Disability Council of NSW

      8 Alberini. Anna, "Optimal design for discrete choice contingent valuation surveys: Single bound, double bound and bivariate models" 28 (28): 287-306, 1995

      9 Ś.wież.awska-Ambroziak, K., "Economical benefits of the design for all" 67-72, 2006

      10 Chollet, D., "A cost-benefit analysis of accessibility, Department of Housing an Urban development" 1979

      11 Ratzka, A, "A brief survey of studies on costs and benefits on non-handicapping environments, International Congress on Accessibility"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-03-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 -> 대한건축학회논문집 계획계
      외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-08-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure&Construction -> Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-14 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한건축학회논문집 구조계 -> 대한건축학회논문집 KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.38 0.38 0.38
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.41 0.4 0.742 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼