RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      화이트칼라 범죄의 심각성 및 양형기준 개선방안에 관한 연구: 횡령, 배임을 중심으로 = Research on the Seriousness of White-collar Crime and the Improvement of the Sentencing Guideline-Focused on Embezzlement/Breach of Trust Crime-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101760017

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The objective of this article is to measure the seriousness of white-collar crime and the national perception on the sentencing, and to explore the problems in the sentencing guideline if the sentencing is insufficient compared to the severity of the crime along with how to improve it. This study examined the general discussion of the seriousness of the crime prior to the full scale debate on the magnitude of the white-collar crime. In the case of foreign countries, there has long been the awareness of the crime of the interest in the social consensus and thereby the cases are plentiful, on the other hand, in our country there is not much concern on this theme, and therefore it is hard to find the records of the research except research by a few scholars. In addition, there are only a few attempts to seek out improvement in the sentencing guideline by logically relating the severity of the crime with the sentencing guideline On the one hand, in regard to one of the most serious white-collar crimes which emerge in contemporary society, in particular, embezzlement/breach of trust crime, it is remarkable that court tended to punish it more generously compared to, so called, street crimes. Of course, this tendency has considerably relaxed since the enforcement of sentencing guideline in 2009, however, most Koreans have the perception that the sentencing is insufficient, compared to the magnitude of the white-collar crime. The issue of sentencing of white-collar crime stems from the imbalance of the sentencing criteria and the extremely poor law enforcement, and in order to address these problems, it is necessary to arrange it upward within the reasonable scope and to develop actively aggravating sentencing factors along with benchmarking of foreign cases and including them in the actual sentencing guideline. Since the research on the exploration on the sentencing factors is none other than wasteland in South Korea, the active research on this is expected.
      번역하기

      The objective of this article is to measure the seriousness of white-collar crime and the national perception on the sentencing, and to explore the problems in the sentencing guideline if the sentencing is insufficient compared to the severity of the ...

      The objective of this article is to measure the seriousness of white-collar crime and the national perception on the sentencing, and to explore the problems in the sentencing guideline if the sentencing is insufficient compared to the severity of the crime along with how to improve it. This study examined the general discussion of the seriousness of the crime prior to the full scale debate on the magnitude of the white-collar crime. In the case of foreign countries, there has long been the awareness of the crime of the interest in the social consensus and thereby the cases are plentiful, on the other hand, in our country there is not much concern on this theme, and therefore it is hard to find the records of the research except research by a few scholars. In addition, there are only a few attempts to seek out improvement in the sentencing guideline by logically relating the severity of the crime with the sentencing guideline On the one hand, in regard to one of the most serious white-collar crimes which emerge in contemporary society, in particular, embezzlement/breach of trust crime, it is remarkable that court tended to punish it more generously compared to, so called, street crimes. Of course, this tendency has considerably relaxed since the enforcement of sentencing guideline in 2009, however, most Koreans have the perception that the sentencing is insufficient, compared to the magnitude of the white-collar crime. The issue of sentencing of white-collar crime stems from the imbalance of the sentencing criteria and the extremely poor law enforcement, and in order to address these problems, it is necessary to arrange it upward within the reasonable scope and to develop actively aggravating sentencing factors along with benchmarking of foreign cases and including them in the actual sentencing guideline. Since the research on the exploration on the sentencing factors is none other than wasteland in South Korea, the active research on this is expected.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김혜정, "횡령・배임죄 양형기준제도의 준수현황 및 개선방안" 한국형사정책연구원 26 (26): 55-84, 2015

      2 최호진, "횡령⋅배임에 있어서 기업의 고위 경영자에 대한 양형분석과 문제점" 법학연구소 39 (39): 63-91, 2015

      3 최인섭, "화이트칼라범죄에 관한 연구: 유형과 사례분석을중심으로" 한국형사정책연구원 1996

      4 성빈, "화이트칼라 범죄에 대한 외국의 연구동향 - 통제(control)적 이론을 중심으로 -" 아시아교정포럼 9 (9): 109-144, 2015

      5 박성훈, "형사정책과 사법제도에 관한 평가연구(VIII): 범죄의 심각성 및 형벌의 적정성에 관한 국민의식 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 2014

      6 이윤호, "현대사회와 범죄" 박영사 2011

      7 이주형, "최초 양형기준에 대한 비판적 고찰" 21 : 45-93, 2009

      8 승재현, "우리나라 양형위원회 양형기준모델의 타당성 평가" 법조협회 59 (59): 87-135, 2010

      9 경제개혁연대, "우리나라 법원의 화이트칼라 범죄 양형 분석: 법원의 집행유예 선고율을 중심으로" 경제개혁리포트 1-18, 2007

      10 최한수, "왜 법원은 재벌(범죄)에 관대한가?" 231 (231): 6-25, 2015

      1 김혜정, "횡령・배임죄 양형기준제도의 준수현황 및 개선방안" 한국형사정책연구원 26 (26): 55-84, 2015

      2 최호진, "횡령⋅배임에 있어서 기업의 고위 경영자에 대한 양형분석과 문제점" 법학연구소 39 (39): 63-91, 2015

      3 최인섭, "화이트칼라범죄에 관한 연구: 유형과 사례분석을중심으로" 한국형사정책연구원 1996

      4 성빈, "화이트칼라 범죄에 대한 외국의 연구동향 - 통제(control)적 이론을 중심으로 -" 아시아교정포럼 9 (9): 109-144, 2015

      5 박성훈, "형사정책과 사법제도에 관한 평가연구(VIII): 범죄의 심각성 및 형벌의 적정성에 관한 국민의식 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 2014

      6 이윤호, "현대사회와 범죄" 박영사 2011

      7 이주형, "최초 양형기준에 대한 비판적 고찰" 21 : 45-93, 2009

      8 승재현, "우리나라 양형위원회 양형기준모델의 타당성 평가" 법조협회 59 (59): 87-135, 2010

      9 경제개혁연대, "우리나라 법원의 화이트칼라 범죄 양형 분석: 법원의 집행유예 선고율을 중심으로" 경제개혁리포트 1-18, 2007

      10 최한수, "왜 법원은 재벌(범죄)에 관대한가?" 231 (231): 6-25, 2015

      11 이현정, "양형위원회의 양형기준안에 대한 비판적 고찰" 법학연구소 21 (21): 359-388, 2009

      12 양형위원회, "양형위원회 연간보고서 2007" 양형위원회 2008

      13 이민식, "양형기준 시행현황 분석 및 개선방안에 관한 연구I" 대검찰청 2011

      14 성빈, "성폭력범죄 양형기준에 관한 연구" 동국대학교 대학원 2011

      15 이창한, "성범죄의 심각성에 대한 법관과 일반인의 인식차이" 한국공안행정학회 18 (18): 273-300, 2009

      16 Croall, H, "White Collar Crime: Criminal Justice and Criminology" Open University Press 1992

      17 Sutherland, E, "White Collar Crime" Dryden Press 1949

      18 Warr, Mark, "What is the Perceived seriousness of Crimes?" 27 : 795-814, 1989

      19 Croall, H, "Understanding White Collar Crime" Open University Press 2001

      20 Quinney, R, "The Social Reality of Crime" Little, Brown & Company 1970

      21 Rossi, Peter H, "The Seriousness of Crimes: Normative Structure and Individual Differences" 39 : 224-237, 1974

      22 Cullen, Francis T, "The Seriousness of Crime Revisited: Have Attitudes Toward White-collar Crime Changed?" 20 : 83-102, 1982

      23 Kelly, Delos H, "Seriousness of Delinquent Behavior: An Alternative Perspective" 10 : 124-135, 1970

      24 Von Hirsch, Andrew, "Past or Future Crime: Deservedness and Dangerousness in the Sentencing of Criminals" Manchester University Press 1986

      25 Rossi, Peter H, "Just Punishments: Federal Guidelines and Public Views Compared Federal Guidelines and Public Views Compared" Aldine Transaction 1997

      26 McCleary, Richard, "Effects of Legal Education and Work Experience on Perceptions of Crime Seriousness" 28 (28): 276-289, 1981

      27 Von Hirsch, Andrew, "Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments" Northeastern University Press 1976

      28 Clinard, M. B, "Criminal Behavior Systems: a Typology" Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1973

      29 Clarke. M, "Business Crime: Its Nature and Control" Polity Press 1990

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.24 1.24 1.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.09 0.97 1.211 0.55
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼