RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국방문민화 과정의 재조명 -성과와 과제를 중심으로- = Reassessing the Civilianization of the Defense Sector

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82503230

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Today the issue of civilianizing the defense sector is not a matter of a democratic principle of civilian control over the military but rather one of efficiency in defense management. The Ministry of National Defense (MND) was established as a military-civilian complex based on complementary collaboration between the military and civilian staff. However, the gravity of the MND has shifted towards military personnel, and the civilian officials have been marginalized. From 2005 onwards, therefore, the civilianization of the MND HQs has been strongly executed as a central part of ``Defense Reform 2020.`` As planned, by 2009 about 70% of director-generals and division directors have been staffed by civilians. Upon closer inspection, however, most of the high-ranking posts formerly occupied by military officers have been filled with retired generals and/or incoming personnel, not by civilian officials already within the MND. The Ministry has yet to turn its focus inward and place top priority on cultivating potential competencies and expertise among civilian staff. The sustainable development of defense policy largely depends on the competencies of civilian officials who have long been working for the MND. Hence it should pay a particular attention to educating and training civilian employees while institutionalizing a system by which talented and trained civilians automatically assume higher posts.
    번역하기

    Today the issue of civilianizing the defense sector is not a matter of a democratic principle of civilian control over the military but rather one of efficiency in defense management. The Ministry of National Defense (MND) was established as a militar...

    Today the issue of civilianizing the defense sector is not a matter of a democratic principle of civilian control over the military but rather one of efficiency in defense management. The Ministry of National Defense (MND) was established as a military-civilian complex based on complementary collaboration between the military and civilian staff. However, the gravity of the MND has shifted towards military personnel, and the civilian officials have been marginalized. From 2005 onwards, therefore, the civilianization of the MND HQs has been strongly executed as a central part of ``Defense Reform 2020.`` As planned, by 2009 about 70% of director-generals and division directors have been staffed by civilians. Upon closer inspection, however, most of the high-ranking posts formerly occupied by military officers have been filled with retired generals and/or incoming personnel, not by civilian officials already within the MND. The Ministry has yet to turn its focus inward and place top priority on cultivating potential competencies and expertise among civilian staff. The sustainable development of defense policy largely depends on the competencies of civilian officials who have long been working for the MND. Hence it should pay a particular attention to educating and training civilian employees while institutionalizing a system by which talented and trained civilians automatically assume higher posts.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "법률 제8097호. 「국방개혁에 관한 법률」"

    2 독고순, "문민화추진 실태분석 및 개선사항 도출을 위한 조사연구" 한국국방연구원 2007

    3 "대통령령 제20974호. 「국방개혁에 관한 법률 시행령」("

    4 국방부, "국방조직변천사" 1992

    5 한국국방연구원, "국방부공무원 경쟁력 강화방안 연구" 2009

    6 한국국방연구원, "국방 주요정책에 대한 고객만족도 조사" 2006

    7 "국무총리훈령 제157호. 「군인에 대한 의전예우 기준」"

    8 Mackey, Robert, "Is a Culture War between American Soldiers and Civilians Inevitable" New York Times 2010

    9 Mackey, Robert, "Gates and Mullen on McChrystal and Civilian Control" New York Times 2010

    10 국방부, "21세기 선진정예강군을 위한 국방개혁 2010(안)" 2005

    1 "법률 제8097호. 「국방개혁에 관한 법률」"

    2 독고순, "문민화추진 실태분석 및 개선사항 도출을 위한 조사연구" 한국국방연구원 2007

    3 "대통령령 제20974호. 「국방개혁에 관한 법률 시행령」("

    4 국방부, "국방조직변천사" 1992

    5 한국국방연구원, "국방부공무원 경쟁력 강화방안 연구" 2009

    6 한국국방연구원, "국방 주요정책에 대한 고객만족도 조사" 2006

    7 "국무총리훈령 제157호. 「군인에 대한 의전예우 기준」"

    8 Mackey, Robert, "Is a Culture War between American Soldiers and Civilians Inevitable" New York Times 2010

    9 Mackey, Robert, "Gates and Mullen on McChrystal and Civilian Control" New York Times 2010

    10 국방부, "21세기 선진정예강군을 위한 국방개혁 2010(안)" 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-08-22 학회명변경 영문명 : Research Institute On National Security Affairs -> Research Institute for National Security Affairs KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.61 0.972 0.29
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼