RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    잘삶의 통합적 이해와 교육적 함의 = The Integral Interpretations of the Concept of Well-being and Their Educational Implications

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76372172

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is to explore the concept of well-being in the integral viewpoints and their implications of education. Until now, the well-being theory has been discussed with two theoretical tradition: Objective Theories; Subjective Theories. Both, however, have theoretical weaknesses. Doret de Ruyter, and John White try to make up for them. De Ruyter argues the concept of `happy flourishing`. She believes that human well-being consists of two aspects: the fulfillment of generic goods that are objectively identifiable and the meaningful interpretation of these goods by the individual in a way that is personally satisfactory. For this conception, she uses the term of `happy flourishing`. De Ruyter contends that educating children with ideals is important to motivate them to strive for something higher or better. White argues the issue of culture and authority in wellbeing theory. He argues that goods are not related to our particular desires. Goods lie to the outside of individuals. They are created largely within cultures. Authority on well-being does not belong to individuals, but to a `loose` collection of people. They not only must have some experience of most of the major areas of worthwhile activity, but are also interested in reflecting on what makes a flourishing human life. It is important task of education to guide children to participate the conversation and communication with loose collection of people. They contribute to the integral interpretation of the concept of well-being. Their arguments have a lot of implications to the practices of education. They remind us that the promotion of personal well-being is a central aim of education.
    번역하기

    This study is to explore the concept of well-being in the integral viewpoints and their implications of education. Until now, the well-being theory has been discussed with two theoretical tradition: Objective Theories; Subjective Theories. Both, howev...

    This study is to explore the concept of well-being in the integral viewpoints and their implications of education. Until now, the well-being theory has been discussed with two theoretical tradition: Objective Theories; Subjective Theories. Both, however, have theoretical weaknesses. Doret de Ruyter, and John White try to make up for them. De Ruyter argues the concept of `happy flourishing`. She believes that human well-being consists of two aspects: the fulfillment of generic goods that are objectively identifiable and the meaningful interpretation of these goods by the individual in a way that is personally satisfactory. For this conception, she uses the term of `happy flourishing`. De Ruyter contends that educating children with ideals is important to motivate them to strive for something higher or better. White argues the issue of culture and authority in wellbeing theory. He argues that goods are not related to our particular desires. Goods lie to the outside of individuals. They are created largely within cultures. Authority on well-being does not belong to individuals, but to a `loose` collection of people. They not only must have some experience of most of the major areas of worthwhile activity, but are also interested in reflecting on what makes a flourishing human life. It is important task of education to guide children to participate the conversation and communication with loose collection of people. They contribute to the integral interpretation of the concept of well-being. Their arguments have a lot of implications to the practices of education. They remind us that the promotion of personal well-being is a central aim of education.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Noddings, N, "행복과 교육" 학이당 2008

    2 김희봉, "지식,‘잘삶’,그리고 교육" 26 : 99-118, 2001

    3 김정래, "잘삶의 개념과 교육" 35 (35): 1-21, 1997

    4 김희봉, "잘삶을 위한 일의 교육" 한국교육철학학회 (40) : 85-107, 2007

    5 White,J, "교육목적론" 학지사 1990

    6 김희봉, "‘잘삶’이론에 기초한 교육목적 연구" 전남대학교 2001

    7 White,J, "Wellbeing and Education: Issues of Culture and Authority" 41 (41): 17-28, 2007

    8 Marples,R, "Well-being as an Aim of Education.in The Aims of Education" Routledge 133-144, 1999

    9 Crisp,R, "Well-being and Morality:Essays in Honour of James Griffin" Clarendon Press 2000

    10 Griffin,J, "Well-being" Clarendon Press 1986

    1 Noddings, N, "행복과 교육" 학이당 2008

    2 김희봉, "지식,‘잘삶’,그리고 교육" 26 : 99-118, 2001

    3 김정래, "잘삶의 개념과 교육" 35 (35): 1-21, 1997

    4 김희봉, "잘삶을 위한 일의 교육" 한국교육철학학회 (40) : 85-107, 2007

    5 White,J, "교육목적론" 학지사 1990

    6 김희봉, "‘잘삶’이론에 기초한 교육목적 연구" 전남대학교 2001

    7 White,J, "Wellbeing and Education: Issues of Culture and Authority" 41 (41): 17-28, 2007

    8 Marples,R, "Well-being as an Aim of Education.in The Aims of Education" Routledge 133-144, 1999

    9 Crisp,R, "Well-being and Morality:Essays in Honour of James Griffin" Clarendon Press 2000

    10 Griffin,J, "Well-being" Clarendon Press 1986

    11 Sumner, "Welfare,Happiness,and Ethics" Clarendon Press 1996

    12 Reid,A, "The Value of Education." 32 (32): 319-331, 1998

    13 Hurka,T, "The Three Faces of Flourishing.in Human Flourishing" Cambridge University Press 44-71, 1999

    14 Raz,J, "The Morality of Freedom" Clarendon Press 1986

    15 Parfit,D, "Reasons and Persons" Oxford University Press 1984

    16 De Ruyter,D.J, "Pottering in the Garden? On Human Flourishing and Education" 52 (52): 377-389, 2004

    17 Moore,A, "Objective Human Goods.in Well-being and Morality:Essays in Honour of James Griffin" Clarendon Press 75-89, 2000

    18 De Ruyter,D.J, "Ideals,Education,and Happy Flourishing." 57 (57): 23-35, 2007

    19 Paul,E., "Human Flourishing" Cambridge University Press 1999

    20 Kekes,J, "Happiness" 91 (91): 358-376, 1982

    21 White,J, "Education,the Market and the Nature of Personal Well-being" 50 (50): 442-456, 2002

    22 White,J, "Education and Personal Well-being in a Secular Universe. An Inaugural Lecture"

    23 White,J, "Autonomy.Human Flourishing and the Curriculum" 40 (40): 381-390, 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-03-29 학술지명변경 한글명 : 교육철학 -> 교육철학연구 KCI등재
    2011-03-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 교육철학회 -> 한국교육철학학회
    영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Philosophy of Education Society
    KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Philosophy of Education Society -> The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.75 0.75 0.86
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.88 1.27 0.33
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼