RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    도시개발, 도시 공공시설 자금 조달, 개발부담금에 관한 이론적 고찰 = Theoretical Reflections on New Urban Development, Financing Urban Public Facilities, and Impact Fees

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper theoretically explores the relationships among new urban development, financing urban public facilities, and impact fees. Local governments face a dilemma of escalating demands for public facilities and services caused by new development without having sufficient revenues to finance these demands. Existing residents are resistant to higher taxes and fees to fund the services and improvements required by new residents. As a consequence of this problem, there is considerable interest in impact fees since impact fees are viewed as a way to ‘growth pay its way.’ It is safe to predict that local governments will increasingly turn to new sources of revenues such as impact fees to finance capital needs brought on by rapid growth. Impact fees raise such fundamental social questions as: Who really pays? How is the fee calculated? Where does the money go? How and where is it spent? Who really benefits from the new or expanded public facilities? What is the impact on housing costs? How is business generation or expansion affected? How does an impact fee policy mesh with a community`s and region`s affordable housing policy? Is new development being required to pay its fair share, or something more?
    번역하기

    This paper theoretically explores the relationships among new urban development, financing urban public facilities, and impact fees. Local governments face a dilemma of escalating demands for public facilities and services caused by new development wi...

    This paper theoretically explores the relationships among new urban development, financing urban public facilities, and impact fees. Local governments face a dilemma of escalating demands for public facilities and services caused by new development without having sufficient revenues to finance these demands. Existing residents are resistant to higher taxes and fees to fund the services and improvements required by new residents. As a consequence of this problem, there is considerable interest in impact fees since impact fees are viewed as a way to ‘growth pay its way.’ It is safe to predict that local governments will increasingly turn to new sources of revenues such as impact fees to finance capital needs brought on by rapid growth. Impact fees raise such fundamental social questions as: Who really pays? How is the fee calculated? Where does the money go? How and where is it spent? Who really benefits from the new or expanded public facilities? What is the impact on housing costs? How is business generation or expansion affected? How does an impact fee policy mesh with a community`s and region`s affordable housing policy? Is new development being required to pay its fair share, or something more?

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼