RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사회복지사들의 조사연구활용에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103478858

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      본 연구의 목적은 사회복지실천현장에서 사회복지사들의 조사연구활용 정도를 파악하고, 조사연구활용에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 파악하기 위해 이루어졌다. 연구대상은 우리 나라의 사회복지실천현장에 종사하고 있는 사회복지사들이며, 다단계 추출법에 의해 표본을 추출하였다. 우편조사의 방법으로 자료를 수집하였으며, 최종 569명의 자료에 대한 순서 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과 사회복지사들의 조사연구활용 정도는 매우 낮았지만, 조사연구에 대한 태도는 긍정적이었다. 조사연구활용에 영향을 미치는 변수들은 주로 사회복지사의 조사연구 활용능력과 관련된 조사연구에 대한 재교육 경험, 연구저널이용경험, 조사연구의 유용성에 대한 태도, 성별 등이었으며, 환경특성으로는 기관의 종류가 유의미하였다. 이 같은 연구결과를 가지고 조사연구활용 활성화 방향을 찾아보았다.
      번역하기

      본 연구의 목적은 사회복지실천현장에서 사회복지사들의 조사연구활용 정도를 파악하고, 조사연구활용에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 파악하기 위해 이루어졌다. 연구대상은 우리 나라의 사회...

      본 연구의 목적은 사회복지실천현장에서 사회복지사들의 조사연구활용 정도를 파악하고, 조사연구활용에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 파악하기 위해 이루어졌다. 연구대상은 우리 나라의 사회복지실천현장에 종사하고 있는 사회복지사들이며, 다단계 추출법에 의해 표본을 추출하였다. 우편조사의 방법으로 자료를 수집하였으며, 최종 569명의 자료에 대한 순서 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과 사회복지사들의 조사연구활용 정도는 매우 낮았지만, 조사연구에 대한 태도는 긍정적이었다. 조사연구활용에 영향을 미치는 변수들은 주로 사회복지사의 조사연구 활용능력과 관련된 조사연구에 대한 재교육 경험, 연구저널이용경험, 조사연구의 유용성에 대한 태도, 성별 등이었으며, 환경특성으로는 기관의 종류가 유의미하였다. 이 같은 연구결과를 가지고 조사연구활용 활성화 방향을 찾아보았다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purposes of this study were to investigate the research utilization in social work practice and to examine the factors associated with research utilization. The subjects of this study were social workers participating in social work practice in Korea. The sampling methods used in this study was a multistage sampling strategy. Data were collected by sending mails and follow-up mails to the social workers. Data from 569 of social workers were finally analyzed by ordered regression analysis. The results showed that the level of research utilization by social workers in Korea was very low, but their attitude toward research was positive. The variables affecting research utilization were related to the research ability of social workers, but the variables of research related environment except type of organization were not significant. The variables for research ability of social workers are experiences of utilizing journal articles, experiences of re-education for research methodology, gender, attitude about research usefulness. The variables for research related environment are characteristics of agency setting. The implications of social work research are discussed.
      번역하기

      The purposes of this study were to investigate the research utilization in social work practice and to examine the factors associated with research utilization. The subjects of this study were social workers participating in social work practice in Ko...

      The purposes of this study were to investigate the research utilization in social work practice and to examine the factors associated with research utilization. The subjects of this study were social workers participating in social work practice in Korea. The sampling methods used in this study was a multistage sampling strategy. Data were collected by sending mails and follow-up mails to the social workers. Data from 569 of social workers were finally analyzed by ordered regression analysis. The results showed that the level of research utilization by social workers in Korea was very low, but their attitude toward research was positive. The variables affecting research utilization were related to the research ability of social workers, but the variables of research related environment except type of organization were not significant. The variables for research ability of social workers are experiences of utilizing journal articles, experiences of re-education for research methodology, gender, attitude about research usefulness. The variables for research related environment are characteristics of agency setting. The implications of social work research are discussed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • [요약]
      • 1. 문제제기
      • 2. 이론적 배경
      • 3. 연구방법
      • 4. 결과
      • [요약]
      • 1. 문제제기
      • 2. 이론적 배경
      • 3. 연구방법
      • 4. 결과
      • 5. 결론 및 제언
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김인숙, "한국사회복지실천학문의 정체성" 33-53, 2004

      2 양옥경, "한국 임상사회복지실천의 효과성 연구 경향에 관한 연구" 42 : 225-253, 2000

      3 배규한, "통계조사방법론" 한국방송대학출판부 2003

      4 "우리나라 사회복지학 연구경향에 관한 연구" 35 : 85-105, 1998

      5 "사회사업가의 조사연구에 대한 태도와 활동에 관한 연구 사회복지연구" 201-224, 1993

      6 이혜경, "사회복지학의 정체성" 63-74, 1995

      7 이상균, "사회복지실천 프로그램에 대한 메타분석" 40 : 131-156, 2000

      8 A, "research utilization in the search for scientifically based nursing practice Focus on Critical Care 17" 78-81, 1990

      9 Powell, W. E, "What exactly is it we do that makes a difference" 84 (84): 3-6, 2003

      10 Stevens, M, "Using research in practice : A research information service for social care practitioners" 10 : 67-75, 2005

      1 김인숙, "한국사회복지실천학문의 정체성" 33-53, 2004

      2 양옥경, "한국 임상사회복지실천의 효과성 연구 경향에 관한 연구" 42 : 225-253, 2000

      3 배규한, "통계조사방법론" 한국방송대학출판부 2003

      4 "우리나라 사회복지학 연구경향에 관한 연구" 35 : 85-105, 1998

      5 "사회사업가의 조사연구에 대한 태도와 활동에 관한 연구 사회복지연구" 201-224, 1993

      6 이혜경, "사회복지학의 정체성" 63-74, 1995

      7 이상균, "사회복지실천 프로그램에 대한 메타분석" 40 : 131-156, 2000

      8 A, "research utilization in the search for scientifically based nursing practice Focus on Critical Care 17" 78-81, 1990

      9 Powell, W. E, "What exactly is it we do that makes a difference" 84 (84): 3-6, 2003

      10 Stevens, M, "Using research in practice : A research information service for social care practitioners" 10 : 67-75, 2005

      11 Kirk, "Understanding research utilization in social work in Sourcebook on Research Utilization edited by A Council on Social Work Education" 3-15, 1979

      12 Rompf, M. E, "Undergraduate Research Courses : A closer look reveals complex social work student attitudes" 39 (39): 411-422, 2003

      13 Mullen, "Toward an Integration of Research and Practice in the Social Work Curriculum A Description and Evaluation of a One-quarter course edited by R Council on Social Work Education" 30-41, 1980

      14 Praeger, "The use of research in social work practice a case example from school of social work" 1993

      15 but, "The purposes of this study were to investigate the research utilization in social work practice and to examine the factors associated with research utilization The subjects of this study were social workers participating in social work practice in Korea The sampling methods used in this study was a multistage sampling strategy Data were collected by sending mails and follow-up mails to the social workers Data from 569 of social workers were finally analyzed by ordered regression analysis The results showed that the level of research utilization by social workers in Korea was very low"

      16 Cournoyer, B. R, "The evidence-based social work skills book" 2004

      17 Reid,W.J, "The empirical practice movement" 165-184, 1994

      18 Lindsey, "The continuing crisis in social work research Conundrum or solvable problem? An essay review Journal of Social Work Education 28" 370-381, 1992

      19 Estabrooks, C. A, "The conceptual structure of research utilization" 22 : 203-216, 1999a

      20 Rosenblatt,A, "The Practitioner's Use and Evaluation of Research" 13 : 53-59, 1968

      21 Whittaker, J. K, "The Practice-Research Nexus in Social Work : Problems and Prospects" 72 : 686-694, 2002

      22 Zlotnik, J. L, "The Institute for the Advancement of Social Work Research : Strengthening Social Work Research in Practice and Policy" 12 (12): 318-337, 2002

      23 Landry, R, "The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies" 63 (63): 192-205, 2003

      24 Biegel, D. E, "The Cuyahoga County Community Mental Health Institute : An Academic-Public Mental Health Research Partnership" 11 : 390-403, 2001

      25 Globerman,J, "Teaching critical appraisal of the social work literature" (2) : 63-80, 1993

      26 Howard, M. O, "Teaching Evidence-Based Practice : Toward a New Paradigm for Social Work Education" 13 (13): 234-259, 2003

      27 Washington DC, "Task Force on Social Work Research Building social work knowledge for effective services and policies A plan for development" NASW Press 1991

      28 Rosen, A, "Social work research and the quest for effective practice" 23 (23): 4-15, 1999

      29 "Social Worker and Research Utilization in Social Work Practice"

      30 Barber, J. G, "Science and social work : Are they compatible" 6 : 379-388, 1996

      31 Kirk, "Research Knowledge and Orientation among Social Work Students in Research Utilization in Social Work Education edited by H Council on Social Work Education" 4-39, 1981

      32 Long, J. S, "Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables" Sage Publications 1997

      33 Hess,P, M, "Practitioner-researcher partnerships:Buildings knowledge from" NASW Press 1995

      34 Scoot, D, "Practice Wisdom : The Neglected Source of Practice Research" 35 (35): 564-568, 1999

      35 Reilly, B, "Part II Evidence-based medicine : A passing fancy or the future of primary care" 370-399, 1998

      36 Barratt, M, "Organizational support for evidence-based practice within child and family social work : a collaborative study" 8 : 143-150, 2003

      37 Casselman,B, "On the Practitioner's Orientation toward Research" 42 : 211-233, 1972

      38 "Modeling the individual determinants of research utilization" 21 : 758-772, 1999b

      39 Reback, C. J, "Making Collaboration Work : Key Components of Practice Research partnerships" 32 : 837-848, 2002

      40 Herie, M, "Knowledge Diffusion in Social Work : A New Approach to Building the Gap" 47 (47): 85-95, 2002

      41 Wynne, "Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 9" 113-117, 1983

      42 Klein, "Is there an ethical responsibility to use practice methods with the best empirical evidence of effectiveness?' pp in Controversial issues in social work research edited by W" 17-36, 1994

      43 Olsen,L, "Integrating a Practice Orientation into the Research Curriculum:The Effect on Knowledge and Attitudes" (2) : 155-161, 1990

      44 Epstein, I, "In quest of a research-based model for clinical practice : Or why can't social worker be more like a researcher" 20 : 97-100, 1996

      45 Bloom, "Guidelines for the Accountable Professional" Prentice-Hall Inc 1982

      46 Sheldon, B, "Evidence-based social care : A study of prospects an dropout problems" Russell House Publishing 2000

      47 Comer, E, "Development of Innovative Group Work Using the Intervention Research Paradigm" 49 (49): 1-23, 2004

      48 Durham, A, "Developing a sensitive practitioner research methodology for studying the impact of child sexual abuse" 32 : 429-442, 2002

      49 Lilford, R, "Decision analysis in the selection design and application of clinical and health services research" 3 : 159-166, 1998

      50 Shaw, I. F, "Cutting Edge Issues in Social Work Research" 33 : 107-116, 2003

      51 Rothman,J, "Conversion and Design in the Research Utilization Process" 117-131, 1978

      52 Faul, A. C, "Can Empirical Clinical Practice Techniques Improve Social Work Outcomes" 11 (11): 277-299, 2001

      53 Funk, "Barriers to using research findings in practice" 90-95, 1991

      54 Martin, G. W, "A social marketing model for disseminating research-based treatment to addicting treatment providers" 93 : 1703-1715, 1998

      55 Profetto-McGrath, J, "A Study of Critical Thinking and Research Utilization Among Nurses" 25 (25): 322-337, 2003

      56 Wood, "A New Look at the Research Evidence" 437-458, 1978

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.66 1.66 1.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.8 1.87 2.088 0.4
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼