RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Standardizing the Spinal Physical Examination Using A Modified Delphi Method

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107767232

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: The use of telemedicine has dramatically increased due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Many neurosurgeons are now using telemedicine technologies for preoperative evaluations and routine outpatient visits. Our goal was to standardize the telemedicine motor neurologic examination, summarize the evidence surrounding clinical use of telehealth technologies, and discuss financial and legal considerations.
      Methods: We identified a 12-member panel composed of spine surgeons, fellows, and senior residents at a single institution. We created an initial telehealth strength examination protocol based on published data and developed 10 agree/disagree statements summarizing the protocol. A blinded Delphi method was utilized to build consensus for each statement, defined as >80% agreement and no significant disagreement using a 2-way binomial test (significance threshold of p<0.05). Any statement that did not meet consensus was edited and iteratively resubmitted to the panel until consensus was achieved. In the final round, the panel was unblinded and the protocol was finalized.
      Results: After the first round, 4/10 statements failed to meet consensus (<80% agreement, and p=0.031, p=0.031, p=0.003, and p=0.031 statistical disagreement, respectively). The disagreement pertained to grading of strength of the upper (3/10 statements) and lower extremities (1/10 statement). The amended statements clarified strength grading, achieved consensus (>80% agreement, p>0.05 disagreement), and were used to create the final telehealth strength examination protocol.
      Conclusion: The resulting protocol was used in our clinic to standardize the telehealth strength examination. This protocol, as well as our summary of telehealth clinical practice, should aid neurosurgical clinics in integrating telemedicine modalities into their practice.
      번역하기

      Objective: The use of telemedicine has dramatically increased due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Many neurosurgeons are now using telemedicine technologies for preoperative evaluations and routine outpatient visits. Our goal was to standard...

      Objective: The use of telemedicine has dramatically increased due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Many neurosurgeons are now using telemedicine technologies for preoperative evaluations and routine outpatient visits. Our goal was to standardize the telemedicine motor neurologic examination, summarize the evidence surrounding clinical use of telehealth technologies, and discuss financial and legal considerations.
      Methods: We identified a 12-member panel composed of spine surgeons, fellows, and senior residents at a single institution. We created an initial telehealth strength examination protocol based on published data and developed 10 agree/disagree statements summarizing the protocol. A blinded Delphi method was utilized to build consensus for each statement, defined as >80% agreement and no significant disagreement using a 2-way binomial test (significance threshold of p<0.05). Any statement that did not meet consensus was edited and iteratively resubmitted to the panel until consensus was achieved. In the final round, the panel was unblinded and the protocol was finalized.
      Results: After the first round, 4/10 statements failed to meet consensus (<80% agreement, and p=0.031, p=0.031, p=0.003, and p=0.031 statistical disagreement, respectively). The disagreement pertained to grading of strength of the upper (3/10 statements) and lower extremities (1/10 statement). The amended statements clarified strength grading, achieved consensus (>80% agreement, p>0.05 disagreement), and were used to create the final telehealth strength examination protocol.
      Conclusion: The resulting protocol was used in our clinic to standardize the telehealth strength examination. This protocol, as well as our summary of telehealth clinical practice, should aid neurosurgical clinics in integrating telemedicine modalities into their practice.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 McAnany JJ, "iPhone-based pupillometry: a novel approach for assessing the pupillary lightreflex" 95 : 953-958, 2018

      2 Kahn EN, "eurosurgery and telemedicine in the United States: assessment of the risks and opportunities" 89 : 133-138, 2016

      3 Snyder SR, "elemedicine for elective neurosurgical routine follow-up care: a promising patient-centered and cost-effective alternative to in-person clinic visits" 44 : E18-, 2018

      4 Yeung WK, "eHealth tools for the selftesting of visual acuity: a scoping review" 2 : 82-, 2019

      5 "Waiver or modification of requirements under section 1135of the social security act"

      6 Shenai MB, "Virtual interactive presence for real-time, long-distance surgical collaboration during complex microsurgical procedures: technical note" 121 : 277-284, 2014

      7 Eubank BH, "Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology" 16 : 56-, 2016

      8 Truter P, "The validity of physical therapy assessment of low back pain via telerehabilitation in a clinical setting" 20 : 161-167, 2014

      9 Achey M, "The past, present, and future of telemedicine for Parkinson’s disease" 29 : 871-883, 2014

      10 Dadlani R, "The impact of telemedicine in the postoperative care of the neurosurgery patient in an outpatient clinic: a unique perspective of this valuable resource in the developing world - an experience of more than 3000 teleconsultations" 82 : 270-283, 2014

      1 McAnany JJ, "iPhone-based pupillometry: a novel approach for assessing the pupillary lightreflex" 95 : 953-958, 2018

      2 Kahn EN, "eurosurgery and telemedicine in the United States: assessment of the risks and opportunities" 89 : 133-138, 2016

      3 Snyder SR, "elemedicine for elective neurosurgical routine follow-up care: a promising patient-centered and cost-effective alternative to in-person clinic visits" 44 : E18-, 2018

      4 Yeung WK, "eHealth tools for the selftesting of visual acuity: a scoping review" 2 : 82-, 2019

      5 "Waiver or modification of requirements under section 1135of the social security act"

      6 Shenai MB, "Virtual interactive presence for real-time, long-distance surgical collaboration during complex microsurgical procedures: technical note" 121 : 277-284, 2014

      7 Eubank BH, "Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology" 16 : 56-, 2016

      8 Truter P, "The validity of physical therapy assessment of low back pain via telerehabilitation in a clinical setting" 20 : 161-167, 2014

      9 Achey M, "The past, present, and future of telemedicine for Parkinson’s disease" 29 : 871-883, 2014

      10 Dadlani R, "The impact of telemedicine in the postoperative care of the neurosurgery patient in an outpatient clinic: a unique perspective of this valuable resource in the developing world - an experience of more than 3000 teleconsultations" 82 : 270-283, 2014

      11 Okoli C, "The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications" 42 : 15-29, 2004

      12 Postuma R, "Telepediatric surgery: capturing clinical outcomes" 40 : 813-818, 2005

      13 Horbinski C, "Telepathology for intraoperative neuropathologic consultations at an academic medical center: a 5-year report" 66 : 750-759, 2007

      14 Kane RL, "Teleneurology in patients with multiple sclerosis: EDSS ratings derived remotely and from hands-on examination" 14 : 190-194, 2008

      15 Nittari G, "Telemedicine practice:review of the current ethical and legal challenges" 26 : 1427-1437, 2020

      16 Awadallah M, "Telemedicine in general neurology: interrater reliability of clinical neurological examination via audio-visual telemedicine" 80 : 289-294, 2019

      17 Wood EW, "Telemedicine consultations in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a follow-up study" 74 : 262-268, 2016

      18 "Telehealth programs"

      19 Douglas S, "Telehealth in plastic surgery: a veterans affairs hospital perspective" 6 : e1840-, 2018

      20 Gilman M, "Telehealth and medicare: payment policy, current use, and prospects for growth" 3 : 2013

      21 Tuckson RV, "Telehealth" 377 : 1585-1592, 2017

      22 Hayward K, "Socioeconomic patient benefits of a pediatric neurosurgery telemedicine clinic" 25 : 204-208, 2020

      23 Nazari Khanamiri H, "Smartphone fundus photography" (125) : 55958-, 2017

      24 United States Department of Health and Human Services, "Secretary Azar announces historic expansion of telehealth access to combat COVID-19" United States Department of Health and Human Services 2020

      25 Fogel AL, "Reported cases of medical malpractice in direct-to-consumer telemedicine" 321 : 1309-1310, 2019

      26 Darby JM, "Reliability of the telemedicine examination in the neurologic diagnosis of death" 11 : 13-17, 2021

      27 Meyer BC, "Prospective reliability of the STRokE DOC wireless/site independent telemedicine system" 64 : 1058-1060, 2005

      28 Sathiyakumar V, "Prospective randomized controlled trial using telemedicine for follow-ups in an orthopedic trauma population: a pilot study" 29 : e139-e145, 2015

      29 Reider-Demer M, "Prospective and retrospective study of videoconference telemedicine followup after elective neurosurgery: results of a pilot program" 41 : 497-501, 2018

      30 "President Trump expands telehealth benefits for edicare beneficiaries during COVID-19 outbreak"

      31 Tofte JN, "Postoperative care via smartphone following carpal tunnel release" 26 : 223-231, 2020

      32 Mendez I, "Point-of-Care programming for neuromodulation" 72 : 99-108, 2013

      33 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, "Physicians and other clinicians: CMS flexibilities to fight COVID-19"

      34 James HE, "Pediatric neurosurgery telemedicine clinics: a model to provide care to geographically underserved areas of the United States and its territories" 18 : 753-757, 2016

      35 Jena AB, "Outcomes of medical malpractice litigation against US physicians" 172 : 892-894, 2012

      36 "Opening up America again" The White House 2020

      37 "Notification of enforcement discretion for telehealth remote communications during the COVID-19 nationwide public health emergency"

      38 Rovit RL, "Neurosurgical experience with malpractice litigation : an analysis of closed claims against neurosurgeons in New York State, 1999 through 2003" 106 : 1108-1114, 2007

      39 Craig JJ, "Neurological examination is possible using telemedicine" 5 : 177-181, 1999

      40 Holekamp NM, "Moving from clinic to home: what the future holds for ophthalmic telemedicine" 187 : xxviii-xxxv, 2018

      41 Horton K, "Medicare payment rules and telemedicine" 129 : 196-, 2014

      42 Jena AB, "Malpractice risk according to physician specialty" 36 (36): 629-636, 2011

      43 Kramer GM, "Legal, regulatory, and risk management issues in the use of technology to deliver mental health care" 22 : 258-268, 2015

      44 Dorsey ER, "Increasing access to specialty care: a pilot, randomized controlled trial of telemedicine for Parkinson’s disease" 25 : 1652-1659, 2010

      45 Ahmed SN, "Feasibility of epilepsy follow-up care through telemedicine: a pilot study on the patient’s perspective" 49 : 573-585, 2008

      46 Veazie S, "Evidence brief: video telehealth for primary care and mental health services" Department of Veterans Affairs (US) 2019

      47 Viers BR, "Efficiency, satisfaction, and costs for remote video visits following radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial" 68 : 729-735, 2015

      48 Gunter RL, "Current Use of telemedicine for post-discharge surgical care: a systematic review" 222 : 915-927, 2016

      49 Thakar S, "Comparison of telemedicine with in-person care for follow-up after elective neurosurgery: results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of 1200patients using patient-perceived utility scores" 44 : E17-, 2018

      50 oh PK, "Can patients with dementia be assessed at a distance? The use of Telehealth and standardised assessments" 34 : 239-242, 2004

      51 "COVID-19 Information Page"

      52 Wirz R, "An experimental feasibility study on robotic endonasal telesurgery" 76 : 479-484, 2015

      53 Palacín-Marín F, "Agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face clinical outcome assessments for low back pain in primary care" 38 : 947-952, 2013

      54 Wechsler LR, "Advantages and limitations of teleneurology" 72 : 349-354, 2015

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2018-03-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한척추신경외과학회지 -> Neurospine KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-09-19 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean journal of spine -> Neurospine KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.13 0.13 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.12 0.411 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼