한국물류기업의 녹색활동 결정요인에 관한 연구: 이해관계자 이론을 중심으로 = Determinants of Green Practice Adoption among Korean Logistics Companies: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between stakeholder pressure and the level of green practices in the Korean logistics industry and at the same time to find out what stakeholder groups have led to the greening of this area. To achieve this, the survey questionnaire was designed using the relevant literature review, and then empirical test was conducted based on a data set of 127 Korean logistics companies. Cluster analysis suggested a classification consisting of three dominant green practices in the logistics industry: reactive, defensive, and proactive. The test results suggest that reactive logistics groups attached the highest importance to only government pressure, that defensive logistics groups attached weight to customer, NOGs/society, and government pressure, and that proactive logistics groups perceived all stakeholder groups` pressure as key drivers for the adoption of green practices.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 대한상공회의소, "녹색물류 기업실태와 정부정책 시사점" 2010

2 Nidumolu, R, "Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation" 87 (87): 57-64, 2009

3 Murillo-Luna, J., "Why do patterns of environmental response differ? a stakeholders’ pressure approach" 29 (29): 1125-1240, 2008

4 Donaldson, T., "The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications" 20 (20): 65-91, 1995

5 Henriques, I., "The relationship between environmental perceptions of stakeholder importance" 42 (42): 87-99, 1999

6 Freeman, E. R., "Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach" Pitman/Ballinger 1984

7 Kim, S.T, "Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental logistics practices: is eco-oriented culture a missing link?" 23 (23): 238-258, 2012

8 Roome, N., "Stakeholder power and organizational learning in corporate environmental management" 27 (27): 235-263, 2006

9 Buysse, K., "Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective" 24 : 453-470, 2003

10 Hunt, C.B, "Proactive environmental management: avoiding the toxic trap" 31 (31): 7-18, 1999

11 Hair, J.F, "Multivariate Data Analysis" Pearson Prentice Hall 2010

12 김성태, "Measuring Environmental Logistics Practices" 한국해운물류학회 27 (27): 237-258, 2011

13 Gonzalez-Benito, O, "Implications of market orientation on the environmental transformation of industrial firms" 64 (64): 752-762, 2008

14 BearingPoint, "How mature is the green supply chain?" Survey 2008

15 Porter, M.E, "Greening and competitive: Ending the stalemate" 75 (75): 120-134, 1995

16 Fineman, S, "Green stakeholders: industry interpretations and response" 33 (33): 715-730, 1996

17 Lai, K.H., "Green logistics management and performance: some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters" 40 (40): 267-282, 2012

18 rmstrong, J.S, "Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys" 14 (14): 396-402, 1977

19 Lin, C.Y., "Determinants of green practice adoption for logistics companies in China" 98 (98): 67-83, 2011

20 Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry, "Condition of Firm’s Green Logistics and Implications for Government Policy" Working 2010

21 Sarkis, J, "An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature" 130 (130): 1-15, 2011

22 Clarkson, M. B. E., "A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance" 20 (20): 92-117, 1995

23 Landis, R.S, "A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation modeling" 3 (3): 186-207, 2000