RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      서비스 실패 상황에서 고객 귀인과 반추가 고객분노 및 부정적 구전에 미치는 영향: 서비스 복구 노력의 조절 효과 = The Effects of Customer Attribution and Rumination on Customer Anger and Negative Word-of-Mouth in Service Failure Situations: The Moderating Role of Service Recovery Efforts

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110333079

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examined how customers’ attributions in salesperson-related service failure situations influence customer anger and negative word-of-mouth intentions through rumination, and whether service recovery effort moderates these relationships. Although prior research has explained post-failure responses through attribution theory or emotion-centered models, limited attention has been given to the sequential pathway linking attribution, rumination, emotion, and behavior. To address this gap, this study tested an attribution–rumination–emotion–behavior mechanism using structural equation modeling based on survey data from 250 adults who had experienced a salesperson-related service failure within the past three months. The results showed that effort and ability attributions positively affected event-focused rumination, whereas task difficulty and bad luck attributions significantly affected self-focused rumination. Event-focused rumination significantly increased customer anger, whereas self-focused rumination did not. Customer anger, in turn, significantly increased negative word-of-mouth intention. The moderation analysis revealed that service recovery effort weakened the positive effect of event-focused rumination on customer anger. However, contrary to the hypothesis, anger tended to increase under high recovery effort when customers engaged in self-focused rumination. These findings suggest that service recovery effort does not operate uniformly across rumination types and that emotional outcomes depend on customers’ cognitive processing patterns. This study contributes to the service failure literature by integrating attribution and rumination into a sequential framework and by highlighting the need for differentiated recovery strategies according to rumination type.
      번역하기

      This study examined how customers’ attributions in salesperson-related service failure situations influence customer anger and negative word-of-mouth intentions through rumination, and whether service recovery effort moderates these relationships. A...

      This study examined how customers’ attributions in salesperson-related service failure situations influence customer anger and negative word-of-mouth intentions through rumination, and whether service recovery effort moderates these relationships. Although prior research has explained post-failure responses through attribution theory or emotion-centered models, limited attention has been given to the sequential pathway linking attribution, rumination, emotion, and behavior. To address this gap, this study tested an attribution–rumination–emotion–behavior mechanism using structural equation modeling based on survey data from 250 adults who had experienced a salesperson-related service failure within the past three months. The results showed that effort and ability attributions positively affected event-focused rumination, whereas task difficulty and bad luck attributions significantly affected self-focused rumination. Event-focused rumination significantly increased customer anger, whereas self-focused rumination did not. Customer anger, in turn, significantly increased negative word-of-mouth intention. The moderation analysis revealed that service recovery effort weakened the positive effect of event-focused rumination on customer anger. However, contrary to the hypothesis, anger tended to increase under high recovery effort when customers engaged in self-focused rumination. These findings suggest that service recovery effort does not operate uniformly across rumination types and that emotional outcomes depend on customers’ cognitive processing patterns. This study contributes to the service failure literature by integrating attribution and rumination into a sequential framework and by highlighting the need for differentiated recovery strategies according to rumination type.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼