RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    특집 1 개념으로 보는 해방 전후사 -문학,정치,일상 : 복수의 민주주의들 -해방기 인민(시민), 군중(대중) 개념 번역을 중심으로 = Plural Democracies -Focused on the translation of concepts of people/citizen and crowd/mass

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99955812

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the thesis how the concept of democracy was translated amid ideological conflicts after Korea`s liberation. The concept of democracy after Korea`s liberation was the most democratic translated word, and from any perspective, was the best revolutionary expression for the then players who hoped to construct an independent nation. Thus, fierce conflicts were staged to exclusively use this word. Leftists used people democracy and progressive democracy, centrists used social democracy, and rightists used free democracy. All modified the word democracy according to their inclinations to prove their political legitimacy. In addition, diverse inclinations, which could be absorbed into leftist and rightist circles, coexisted. It was a period of utopia of thoughts when political forces could dream of realizing their ideologies. Democracy represented such diverse ideologies. However, under the political situations of the divided Korea and South`s exclusive establishment of the government, ruling skills became increasingly sophisticated and were bolstered to incorporate these diverse directions. Behind such efforts did lie Russia`s and the U.S. propaganda policies for South Korea. Conflicts were also staged over the translation of sub-concepts of democracy. The word people, the major pillar of democracy, was favorably used in translation by both leftists and rightists after Korea`s liberation. Although the word had subtle varieties, by democracy, leftists referred to the whole unification force for constructing the nation, and rightists referred to the implication of people. The word citizen was not so much a positive word for both leftists and rightists. To leftists, citizen was close to the concept of reactionary bourgeois, and to rightists, citizen was used and translated as general person with the political meaning removed. Thereafter, after the establishment of South Korean government, the concept of people was settled as the North`s word. For some time after the establishment of the government, in the South, citizen replaced people but such replacement lost power. Such words were replaced by the concept of nation, which was the entity of members comprising a state, and was different from the political entity, people. This proved that the state-led ideology was increasingly strengthened. Such phenomenon was well revealed in the collective concept of people, namely, the concept of crowd/masses, and crowd was the collective concept of political entity for leftists. However, as Korea underwent political incidents such as Daegu October 1 incident, such word was demoted to the target of terror for rightists. The word masses appeared, but its meaning was close to the concept of a simple collective group rather than a political force. Thereafter, when April 3 incident and Yeosu and Suncheon incident broke out, the concept of crowd was transferred to the concept of a violent mob. And, only those who agreed to the U.S. military administration and the Korean government could be referred to as nation. The realization of democracy was limited to the activity of the nation who performed only the activity at the representative system level.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the thesis how the concept of democracy was translated amid ideological conflicts after Korea`s liberation. The concept of democracy after Korea`s liberation was the most democratic translated word, and from any perspective, was the bes...

    The purpose of the thesis how the concept of democracy was translated amid ideological conflicts after Korea`s liberation. The concept of democracy after Korea`s liberation was the most democratic translated word, and from any perspective, was the best revolutionary expression for the then players who hoped to construct an independent nation. Thus, fierce conflicts were staged to exclusively use this word. Leftists used people democracy and progressive democracy, centrists used social democracy, and rightists used free democracy. All modified the word democracy according to their inclinations to prove their political legitimacy. In addition, diverse inclinations, which could be absorbed into leftist and rightist circles, coexisted. It was a period of utopia of thoughts when political forces could dream of realizing their ideologies. Democracy represented such diverse ideologies. However, under the political situations of the divided Korea and South`s exclusive establishment of the government, ruling skills became increasingly sophisticated and were bolstered to incorporate these diverse directions. Behind such efforts did lie Russia`s and the U.S. propaganda policies for South Korea. Conflicts were also staged over the translation of sub-concepts of democracy. The word people, the major pillar of democracy, was favorably used in translation by both leftists and rightists after Korea`s liberation. Although the word had subtle varieties, by democracy, leftists referred to the whole unification force for constructing the nation, and rightists referred to the implication of people. The word citizen was not so much a positive word for both leftists and rightists. To leftists, citizen was close to the concept of reactionary bourgeois, and to rightists, citizen was used and translated as general person with the political meaning removed. Thereafter, after the establishment of South Korean government, the concept of people was settled as the North`s word. For some time after the establishment of the government, in the South, citizen replaced people but such replacement lost power. Such words were replaced by the concept of nation, which was the entity of members comprising a state, and was different from the political entity, people. This proved that the state-led ideology was increasingly strengthened. Such phenomenon was well revealed in the collective concept of people, namely, the concept of crowd/masses, and crowd was the collective concept of political entity for leftists. However, as Korea underwent political incidents such as Daegu October 1 incident, such word was demoted to the target of terror for rightists. The word masses appeared, but its meaning was close to the concept of a simple collective group rather than a political force. Thereafter, when April 3 incident and Yeosu and Suncheon incident broke out, the concept of crowd was transferred to the concept of a violent mob. And, only those who agreed to the U.S. military administration and the Korean government could be referred to as nation. The realization of democracy was limited to the activity of the nation who performed only the activity at the representative system level.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 황호덕, "해방기의 문학어와 개념어에 대한 몇 가지 단상" 2012

    2 박지영, "해방기 지식 場의 재편과 ‘번역’의 정치학" 대동문화연구원 (68) : 423-480, 2009

    3 최명표, "해방기 정지용의 시와 행동" 영주어문학회 17 : 209-232, 2009

    4 박용재, "해방기 신어사전의 문화정치학" 상허학회 37 : 365-396, 2013

    5 정우택, "해방기 박인환 시의 정치적 아우라와 전향의 반향" 반교어문학회 (32) : 287-322, 2012

    6 천정환, "해방기 거리의 정치와 표상의 생산" 상허학회 26 : 55-102, 2009

    7 박연희, "해방기 ‘중간자’ 문학의 이념과 표상 ― 김기림의 민족 표상을 중심으로" 상허학회 26 : 307-348, 2009

    8 윤덕영, "해방 직후 신문자료 현황" 16 : 1995

    9 정다운, "주한미군의 선전활동과 『농민주보』" 서강대 2006

    10 임유경, "조소문화협회의 출판·번역 및 소련방문 사업 연구 ― 해방기 북조선의 문화·정치적 국가기획에 대한 문제제기적 검토" 대동문화연구원 (66) : 471-506, 2009

    1 황호덕, "해방기의 문학어와 개념어에 대한 몇 가지 단상" 2012

    2 박지영, "해방기 지식 場의 재편과 ‘번역’의 정치학" 대동문화연구원 (68) : 423-480, 2009

    3 최명표, "해방기 정지용의 시와 행동" 영주어문학회 17 : 209-232, 2009

    4 박용재, "해방기 신어사전의 문화정치학" 상허학회 37 : 365-396, 2013

    5 정우택, "해방기 박인환 시의 정치적 아우라와 전향의 반향" 반교어문학회 (32) : 287-322, 2012

    6 천정환, "해방기 거리의 정치와 표상의 생산" 상허학회 26 : 55-102, 2009

    7 박연희, "해방기 ‘중간자’ 문학의 이념과 표상 ― 김기림의 민족 표상을 중심으로" 상허학회 26 : 307-348, 2009

    8 윤덕영, "해방 직후 신문자료 현황" 16 : 1995

    9 정다운, "주한미군의 선전활동과 『농민주보』" 서강대 2006

    10 임유경, "조소문화협회의 출판·번역 및 소련방문 사업 연구 ― 해방기 북조선의 문화·정치적 국가기획에 대한 문제제기적 검토" 대동문화연구원 (66) : 471-506, 2009

    11 "조선 인민의 권리에 관한 포고의 건, 국가기록원 나라기록포털 참조"

    12 김효중, "정지용의 휘트먼 시 번역에 관한 고찰" 21 : 1992

    13 박연희, "전후, 실존, 시민 표상-청년 모더니스트 박인환을 중심으로" 한국문학연구소 (34) : 157-187, 2008

    14 조선문학가동맹, "전위시인집" 노농사 1947

    15 홍정완, "일제하~해방후 한치진(韓稚振)의 학문체계 정립과 ‘민주주의’론" 역사문제연구소 14 (14): 157-202, 2010

    16 이태준, "소련기행" 朝蘇文化協會 朝鮮文學家同盟 1946

    17 김경린, "새로운 도시와 시민들의 합창" 도시문화사 1949

    18 정지용, "산문;부역시" 동지사 1949

    19 김현식, "삐라로 듣는 해방 직후의 목소리" 소명출판 2011

    20 김득중, "빨갱이의 탄생-여순사건과 반공 국가의 형성" 선인출판사 2009

    21 공임순, "민주주의의 (先)정치적 담론 자원과 인민대중의 진정한 지도자상 - ‘토지개혁’을 둘러싼 김일성과 이승만의 지도자 형상과 민주주의의 지역적 헤게모니화-" 인문과학연구소 (29) : 107-148, 2010

    22 고병권, "민주주의란 무엇인가" 그린비출판사 2011

    23 주르주 아감벤, "민주주의는 죽었는가?-새로운 논쟁을 위하여" 난장 2012

    24 "미군정기정보자료집- 하지문서집3(1945.6.~1948.8.)" 한림대학교 아시아문화연구소 1948

    25 장영민, "미군정기 미국의 대한선전정책" 16 : 2001

    26 이희수, "미군정기 농민 정치교육 소사 공보부의 활동을 중심으로" 한국교육학회 교육사연구회 1997

    27 허은, "미국의 헤게모니와 한국 민족주의 : 냉전시대(1945-1965) 문화적 경계의 구축과 균열의 동반" 高麗大學校 民族文化硏究所 2008

    28 박수현, "미 군정 공보기구 조직의 변천 : 1945.8 - 1948.5" 서울대 2009

    29 조르주 아감벤, "목적없는 수단" 난장 2009

    30 이봉범, "단정수립 후 轉向의 문화사적 연구" 대동문화연구원 (64) : 215-254, 2008

    31 범대순, "눈이 내리면 산에 간다" 한국문학도서관 2002

    32 "농민주보, 신천지, 민성, 백민, 새살림, 민주조선, 학술 외 다수"

    33 김성보, "남북국가 수립기 인민과 국민 개념의 분화" 한국사연구회 (144) : 69-95, 2009

    34 "김수영 전집2-산문" 민음사 2003

    35 박명규, "국민 인민 시민- 개념사로 본 한국의 정치주체" 소화 2009

    36 정호기, "국가의 형성과 광장의 정치- 미군정기의 대중동원과 집합행동" 한국사회사학회 (77) : 155-190, 2008

    37 "경향신문, 동아일보, 조선일보(이상 1945~1949 발행 분량)"

    38 김정인, "개념으로 읽는 한국 근현대(6)- ‘민주주의’ : 해방기 분열 혹은 통합의 아이콘"

    39 윤상현, "1950년대 지식인들의 민족 담론 연구" 서울대 2013

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-08-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> DAEDONG MUNHWA YEON'GU KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-06-10 학회명변경 영문명 : The Institute of Eastern Studies -> Daedong Institute for Korean Studies KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.09 1.09 0.94
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.97 0.95 1.776 0.3
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼