RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    청소년의 사이버인권침해 경험에 따른 자아존중감과 스트레스의 차이 = Difference of Self-Respect and Stress according to Youth's Infringement on Cyber Human Rights

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is aimed at (1) exploring if there is any difference between self-respect and stress according to youth's experience of damage in cyber human rights, (2) analyzing if there is any difference between self-respect and stress according to youth's experience of infliction in cyber human rights.
    The research subjects of this study were 467 human high school students residing at Gyeonggi-province. The measure tool of cyber human rights infliction is 46 question items composed again based on the questionnaire content of internet information use status carried out in 2005, and counselling case collection of cyber libel, sexual harassment in 2004. The measure tool for self-respect was ‘Self-Esteem Questionnaire' developed by Rosenberg(1965) and translated by Kim, Mun Ju(1984). The measure tool for stress was the questionnaire on youth's stress factors and experience in which Byeon, Yeong Ju(1995) modified Lee, Jeong Sun(1988)'s measure. The gathered data were analyzed using SPSS 12.0. To measure the reliability of self-respect and stress items, Cronbach's α was enforced, and to explore the gap if self-respect and stress according to experience in cyber human rights infringement, t-verification came into force.
    The research findings are as follows. First, inquiry into the difference of youth's self-respect by cyber human rights infringement showed the youth experiencing stalking damage and cyber private information were lower those no experiencing. Also the inquiry into self-respect showed that the youth experiencing stalking infliction were lower those no experiencing. Second, the inquiry into sexual harassment showed that the youth experiencing stalking infliction were lower those no experiencing. On the other hand, there was no difference in self-respect between the youth experiencing in cyber sexual harassment damage and those not. Third, in case of cyber individual information among cyber human rights infringement types, the youth experiencing damage were more highly stressed than those, and those experiencing infliction were less stressed than those not experiencing. Fourth, in case of their own photos obscenely synthesized of cyber sexual harassment types, the youth experiencing that were less tressed than those not. Fifth, the status of youth's cyber human rights infringement is diverse, but higher than expected.
    번역하기

    This study is aimed at (1) exploring if there is any difference between self-respect and stress according to youth's experience of damage in cyber human rights, (2) analyzing if there is any difference between self-respect and stress according to yout...

    This study is aimed at (1) exploring if there is any difference between self-respect and stress according to youth's experience of damage in cyber human rights, (2) analyzing if there is any difference between self-respect and stress according to youth's experience of infliction in cyber human rights.
    The research subjects of this study were 467 human high school students residing at Gyeonggi-province. The measure tool of cyber human rights infliction is 46 question items composed again based on the questionnaire content of internet information use status carried out in 2005, and counselling case collection of cyber libel, sexual harassment in 2004. The measure tool for self-respect was ‘Self-Esteem Questionnaire' developed by Rosenberg(1965) and translated by Kim, Mun Ju(1984). The measure tool for stress was the questionnaire on youth's stress factors and experience in which Byeon, Yeong Ju(1995) modified Lee, Jeong Sun(1988)'s measure. The gathered data were analyzed using SPSS 12.0. To measure the reliability of self-respect and stress items, Cronbach's α was enforced, and to explore the gap if self-respect and stress according to experience in cyber human rights infringement, t-verification came into force.
    The research findings are as follows. First, inquiry into the difference of youth's self-respect by cyber human rights infringement showed the youth experiencing stalking damage and cyber private information were lower those no experiencing. Also the inquiry into self-respect showed that the youth experiencing stalking infliction were lower those no experiencing. Second, the inquiry into sexual harassment showed that the youth experiencing stalking infliction were lower those no experiencing. On the other hand, there was no difference in self-respect between the youth experiencing in cyber sexual harassment damage and those not. Third, in case of cyber individual information among cyber human rights infringement types, the youth experiencing damage were more highly stressed than those, and those experiencing infliction were less stressed than those not experiencing. Fourth, in case of their own photos obscenely synthesized of cyber sexual harassment types, the youth experiencing that were less tressed than those not. Fifth, the status of youth's cyber human rights infringement is diverse, but higher than expected.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.88 1.88 2.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.97 1.98 2.586 0.29
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼