RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Bilingualism의 언어학적 측면 = Linguistic Aspects of Billingualism

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2067431

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Linguistic aspects of bilingualism involve three main phenomena: integration, interference, and code-switching. It is estimated that more than a few generations are required for integration to take place. Integration can take place at almost all linguistic levels, but integration at the lexical level is most prevalent. It appears to occur at morphological, syntactic, and phonological level, in decreasing order.
    In contrast, interference is an unstable, short-term phenomenon in language con-tact situation. It may arise at all linguistic levels, the most persistent and subtle of which appear to arise at semantic and cultural levels.
    Code-switching can be seen as a verbal strategy, by means of which a bilingual speaker adjusts himself to the situational needs. It can also provide him with rhetorical devices, which are lacking in monolinguals. Or, it may be seen as a sort of foregrounding, by means of which a speaker tries to highlight or foreground a specific point he wants to emphasize, by putting a word or phrase in a place away from its normal context.
    Cartesian linguistics appears unsuitable for dealing with bilingualism, since it presupposes a homogeneous speech community and deals with an ideal speaker/hearer, functioning in such a society, whereas a bilingual speaker, by definition, functions in a heterogeneous speech community and is usually, but not always, far from being an ideal speaker/hearer.
    Sociolinguistics appears to be a much better model to deal with bilingualism. However, even sociolinguistics alone seems inadequate to a full understanding of bilingualism. Only an interdisciplinary approach-linguistic, psychological, sociological as well as neurolinguistic-appears to be able to fully deal with bilingualism.

    번역하기

    Linguistic aspects of bilingualism involve three main phenomena: integration, interference, and code-switching. It is estimated that more than a few generations are required for integration to take place. Integration can take place at almost all lingu...

    Linguistic aspects of bilingualism involve three main phenomena: integration, interference, and code-switching. It is estimated that more than a few generations are required for integration to take place. Integration can take place at almost all linguistic levels, but integration at the lexical level is most prevalent. It appears to occur at morphological, syntactic, and phonological level, in decreasing order.
    In contrast, interference is an unstable, short-term phenomenon in language con-tact situation. It may arise at all linguistic levels, the most persistent and subtle of which appear to arise at semantic and cultural levels.
    Code-switching can be seen as a verbal strategy, by means of which a bilingual speaker adjusts himself to the situational needs. It can also provide him with rhetorical devices, which are lacking in monolinguals. Or, it may be seen as a sort of foregrounding, by means of which a speaker tries to highlight or foreground a specific point he wants to emphasize, by putting a word or phrase in a place away from its normal context.
    Cartesian linguistics appears unsuitable for dealing with bilingualism, since it presupposes a homogeneous speech community and deals with an ideal speaker/hearer, functioning in such a society, whereas a bilingual speaker, by definition, functions in a heterogeneous speech community and is usually, but not always, far from being an ideal speaker/hearer.
    Sociolinguistics appears to be a much better model to deal with bilingualism. However, even sociolinguistics alone seems inadequate to a full understanding of bilingualism. Only an interdisciplinary approach-linguistic, psychological, sociological as well as neurolinguistic-appears to be able to fully deal with bilingualism.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서 론
    • 2. 언어접촉
    • 2.1 Pidgin과 Creole
    • 2.2 통합(Integration)과 간섭(Interference)
    • 2.3 간섭과 기호전환(code-switching)
    • 1. 서 론
    • 2. 언어접촉
    • 2.1 Pidgin과 Creole
    • 2.2 통합(Integration)과 간섭(Interference)
    • 2.3 간섭과 기호전환(code-switching)
    • 3. 통합(Integration)
    • 3.1 어휘적 레벨
    • 3.2 문법 레벨
    • 3.3 음운적 레벨
    • 3.4 통사적 레벨
    • 3.5 통합의 방향
    • 3.6 요약과 결론
    • 4. 간섭(Interference)
    • 4.1 음운적 간섭
    • 4.2 형태론적 간섭
    • 4.3 통사적 간섭
    • 4.4 의미론적/문화적 간섭
    • 5. 기호전환(code-switching)
    • 5.1 전환의 유형
    • 5.2 전환의 규칙성과 제약
    • 5.3 전환의 생성문법적 접근
    • 5.4 이론적 고찰
    • 6. 요약과 결론
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼