RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      미-중 무역분쟁의 경제적 효과와 세계경제 함의

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105630637

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study analyzes the potential economic effects of a trade war between the U.S. and China. The CGE model is used to estimate the macroeconomic variables of each country and the change in imports/exports by industry by considering three different scenarios: (i) the US imposes a 25% of tariff on China; (ii) the US and China impose a 25% tariff bilaterally; (iii) the United States expands protection in vehicles and metals to Korea, Japan, and the EU.
      According to the results of the study, when the US and China initiate a trade war, GDP and welfare of both countries decline. Chinas decline in GDP and welfare are larger than those of the United States, which implies a trade war is more favorable to the U.S. than to China. In the long run, Chinas GDP and welfare decline widens further. While the trade volumes of the US and China are greatly reduced, the trade volumes of other countries does not significantly fluctuate.
      Finally, if the US extends protection policy to Korea, Japan and the EU, it creates undesirable effects on the US. In particular, damage to the US jeopardizes its advantageous position in a trade war with China. In order to emphasize the unfairness of protectionist policy and the damage to Korean industry, Korea needs to establish a strategy to counter US protectionist policy.
      번역하기

      This study analyzes the potential economic effects of a trade war between the U.S. and China. The CGE model is used to estimate the macroeconomic variables of each country and the change in imports/exports by industry by considering three different sc...

      This study analyzes the potential economic effects of a trade war between the U.S. and China. The CGE model is used to estimate the macroeconomic variables of each country and the change in imports/exports by industry by considering three different scenarios: (i) the US imposes a 25% of tariff on China; (ii) the US and China impose a 25% tariff bilaterally; (iii) the United States expands protection in vehicles and metals to Korea, Japan, and the EU.
      According to the results of the study, when the US and China initiate a trade war, GDP and welfare of both countries decline. Chinas decline in GDP and welfare are larger than those of the United States, which implies a trade war is more favorable to the U.S. than to China. In the long run, Chinas GDP and welfare decline widens further. While the trade volumes of the US and China are greatly reduced, the trade volumes of other countries does not significantly fluctuate.
      Finally, if the US extends protection policy to Korea, Japan and the EU, it creates undesirable effects on the US. In particular, damage to the US jeopardizes its advantageous position in a trade war with China. In order to emphasize the unfairness of protectionist policy and the damage to Korean industry, Korea needs to establish a strategy to counter US protectionist policy.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김수동, "미국과 EU의 반덤핑조치 효과분석과 우리 기업의 대응 사례연구" 산업연구원 2012

      2 Robinson, Sherman, "Trump’s proposed auto tariffs would throw US automakers and workers under the bus" Trade & Investment Policy Watch, Peterson Institute for International Economics(PIIE) 2018

      3 Bown C. P, "Trade deflection and trade depression" 72 (72): 176-201, 2007

      4 Ianchovichina, E., "Theoretical Structure of Dynamic GTAP" GTAP 2001

      5 Wang, Zhi, "Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels" NBER 2013

      6 Prusa, T.J., "On the Spread and Impact of Anti-Dumping" 34 (34): 591-611, 2001

      7 Lee, C.-S., "Korea's Contents in China's Exports to the US and Its Implications to Korean Exports: The Effects of Trump's Tariffs on China"

      8 Konigs J., "Import diversion under European Antidumping Policy" 1 (1): 283-299, 2001

      9 Hertel, Thomas. W., "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications" Cambridge University Press 1997

      10 CEPII, "EconMap Database, V2.4_3"

      1 김수동, "미국과 EU의 반덤핑조치 효과분석과 우리 기업의 대응 사례연구" 산업연구원 2012

      2 Robinson, Sherman, "Trump’s proposed auto tariffs would throw US automakers and workers under the bus" Trade & Investment Policy Watch, Peterson Institute for International Economics(PIIE) 2018

      3 Bown C. P, "Trade deflection and trade depression" 72 (72): 176-201, 2007

      4 Ianchovichina, E., "Theoretical Structure of Dynamic GTAP" GTAP 2001

      5 Wang, Zhi, "Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels" NBER 2013

      6 Prusa, T.J., "On the Spread and Impact of Anti-Dumping" 34 (34): 591-611, 2001

      7 Lee, C.-S., "Korea's Contents in China's Exports to the US and Its Implications to Korean Exports: The Effects of Trump's Tariffs on China"

      8 Konigs J., "Import diversion under European Antidumping Policy" 1 (1): 283-299, 2001

      9 Hertel, Thomas. W., "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications" Cambridge University Press 1997

      10 CEPII, "EconMap Database, V2.4_3"

      11 Konigs J., "Antidumping Protection hurts Exporters: Firm-level evidence" 149 (149): 295-320, 2013

      12 Brenton P., "Anti-Dumping policies in the EU and trade diversion" 17 : 593-607, 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.01 1.01 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.98 0.9 1.149 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼