Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation with different scaler-tip angulations on the shear bond strength and bond failure mode of metallic orthodontic brackets

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: To evaluate the effects of ultrasonic instrumentation with different scaler-tip angulations on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bond failure mode of metallic orthodontic brackets. Methods: Adhesive pre-coated metallic brackets were bonded to 72 extracted human premolars embedded in autopolymerizing acrylic resin. The teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 24 each) to undergo no treatment (control group) or ultrasonic instrumentation with a scaler-tip angulation of 45˚ (45˚-angulation group) or 0˚ (0˚-angulation group). SBS was tested in a universal testing machine, and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The control group had a significantly higher mean SBS value than the treated groups, which showed no significant differences in their mean SBS values. The ARI scores were not significantly different among the groups. Conclusions: Ultrasonic instrumentation around the bracket base reduces the SBS of metallic orthodontic brackets, emphasizing the need for caution during professional oral hygiene procedures in orthodontic patients. The scaler-tip angulation does not influence the SBS reduction and bond failure mode of such brackets.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• INTRODUCTION
• MATERIALS AND METHODS
• RESULTS
• DISCUSSION
• CONCLUSION
• REFERENCES

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Walmsley AD, "Ultrasonic debonding of composite-retained restorations" 166 : 290-294, 1989

2 Checchi L, "The importance of hygiene control in orthodontics" 14 : 35-37, 1988

3 Flemmig TF, "The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro" 25 : 158-163, 1998

4 Sun-Youn Park, "The effect of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate on the in vitro shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets" 대한치과교정학회 43 (43): 23-28, 2013

5 Arabaci T, "Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review" 5 : 2-12, 2007

6 Chapman JA, "Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances" 138 : 188-194, 2010

7 Montasser MA, "Reliability of the adhesive remnant index score system with different magnifications" 79 : 773-776, 2009

8 Müller P, "Potential of shock waves to remove calculus and biofilm" 15 : 959-965, 2011

9 Gwinnett AJ, "Plaque distribution on bonded brackets: a scanning microscope study" 75 : 667-677, 1979

10 Atack NE, "Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances" 67 : 78-85, 1996

11 Krell KV, "Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements" 103 : 258-266, 1993

12 Ogaard B, "Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development" 94 : 68-73, 1988

13 Pont HB, "Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and exvivo evaluation" 138 : 387.e1-387.e9, 2010

14 Zanarini M, "In vitro evaluation of the effects of a fluoride-releasing composite on enamel demineralization around brackets" 13 : 10-16, 2012

15 Giulio AB, "In vitro evaluation of casein phosphopeptideamorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) effect on stripped enamel surfaces. A SEM investigation" 37 : 228-232, 2009

16 International Organization for Standardization, "ISO/TS 11405:2003. Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure" ISO

17 Alessandri Bonetti G, "Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an invivo study with scanning electron microscopy" 140 : 696-702, 2011

18 Olin PS, "Effect of prolonged ultrasonic instrumentation on the retention of cemented cast crowns" 64 : 563-565, 1990

19 Petti S, "Effect of orthodontic therapy with fixed and removable appliances on oral microbiota: a six-month longitudinal study" 20 : 55-62, 1997

20 Chapple IL, "Effect of instrument power setting during ultrasonic scaling upon treatment outcome" 66 : 756-760, 1995

21 Boyer DB, "Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation" 108 : 262-266, 1995

22 Bishara SE, "Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications" 98 : 263-273, 1990

23 Bishara SE, "Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part I. Background and methods" 98 : 145-153, 1990

24 Artun J, "Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment" 85 : 333-340, 1984

25 Ristic M, "Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal tissues in adolescents" 10 : 187-195, 2007

26 Sukontapatipark W, "Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study" 23 : 475-484, 2001

27 Vicente A, "Adhesion promoters: effects on the bond strength of brackets" 18 : 323-326, 2005

28 Reynolds IR, "A review of direct orthodontic bonding" 2 : 171-180, 1975

29 Lombardo L, "A comparative study of lingual bracket bond strength" 12 : 178-187, 2011