RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      淸末 吳祿貞의 영토 인식

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76265600

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In this article, I would like to investigate “Gando problem”(“間島問題”) from a new point of view. That point of view is different from those of the earlier researches. The latter has focused on the possession of Gando from the view of nationalism. But a historical reconciliation among Korea, China and Japan is impossible through the exclusive nationalism that overestimates “aggression vs. resistance.” So, I am concretely concerned with the anguish of the Anti-Qing dynasty revolutionaries. Though they were fundamentally revolutionaries, they should cooperate with the Qing dynasty in order to rescue China from the crisis of the encroachment upon the territory. On an instance, I studied the activities of Wuluzhen(吳祿貞) and his book, “the report on Yanji frontier task”(『延吉邊務報告』) comparing with that of Songjiaoren(宋敎仁) and his book, “Gando problem”(『間島問題』). By dong this, I made a clear which position Chinese had and by which basis they argued their claim to Gando. And I could understand Wuluzhen's diplomatic, military and administrative role in “settling” “Gando problem.” Especially he criticized Japanese argument by drawing up diplomatic document. But being surrendered to Japan by the Qing dynasty finally intensified anti-Qing nationalism.
      번역하기

      In this article, I would like to investigate “Gando problem”(“間島問題”) from a new point of view. That point of view is different from those of the earlier researches. The latter has focused on the possession of Gando from the view of nat...

      In this article, I would like to investigate “Gando problem”(“間島問題”) from a new point of view. That point of view is different from those of the earlier researches. The latter has focused on the possession of Gando from the view of nationalism. But a historical reconciliation among Korea, China and Japan is impossible through the exclusive nationalism that overestimates “aggression vs. resistance.” So, I am concretely concerned with the anguish of the Anti-Qing dynasty revolutionaries. Though they were fundamentally revolutionaries, they should cooperate with the Qing dynasty in order to rescue China from the crisis of the encroachment upon the territory. On an instance, I studied the activities of Wuluzhen(吳祿貞) and his book, “the report on Yanji frontier task”(『延吉邊務報告』) comparing with that of Songjiaoren(宋敎仁) and his book, “Gando problem”(『間島問題』). By dong this, I made a clear which position Chinese had and by which basis they argued their claim to Gando. And I could understand Wuluzhen's diplomatic, military and administrative role in “settling” “Gando problem.” Especially he criticized Japanese argument by drawing up diplomatic document. But being surrendered to Japan by the Qing dynasty finally intensified anti-Qing nationalism.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.52 0.52 0.56
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.65 0.67 1.012 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼