In this article, I would like to investigate “Gando problem”(“間島問題”) from a new point of view. That point of view is different from those of the earlier researches. The latter has focused on the possession of Gando from the view of nat...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76265600
2007
Korean
911
KCI등재
학술저널
93-132(40쪽)
4
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In this article, I would like to investigate “Gando problem”(“間島問題”) from a new point of view. That point of view is different from those of the earlier researches. The latter has focused on the possession of Gando from the view of nat...
In this article, I would like to investigate “Gando problem”(“間島問題”) from a new point of view. That point of view is different from those of the earlier researches. The latter has focused on the possession of Gando from the view of nationalism. But a historical reconciliation among Korea, China and Japan is impossible through the exclusive nationalism that overestimates “aggression vs. resistance.” So, I am concretely concerned with the anguish of the Anti-Qing dynasty revolutionaries. Though they were fundamentally revolutionaries, they should cooperate with the Qing dynasty in order to rescue China from the crisis of the encroachment upon the territory. On an instance, I studied the activities of Wuluzhen(吳祿貞) and his book, “the report on Yanji frontier task”(『延吉邊務報告』) comparing with that of Songjiaoren(宋敎仁) and his book, “Gando problem”(『間島問題』). By dong this, I made a clear which position Chinese had and by which basis they argued their claim to Gando. And I could understand Wuluzhen's diplomatic, military and administrative role in “settling” “Gando problem.” Especially he criticized Japanese argument by drawing up diplomatic document. But being surrendered to Japan by the Qing dynasty finally intensified anti-Qing nationalism.
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.56 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.65 | 0.67 | 1.012 | 0.29 |