明·淸시기 4종 古詩選集에 나타난 漢代 詩歌 비교 분석 ― 『古詩紀』와 『采菽堂古詩選』·『古詩源』·『古詩賞析』을 중심으로 = Comparative Analysis of Poems in Han Dynasty in 4 Collection Books of Ancient Poems Made in Ming and Ching Dynasties: Focusing on "Gosigi", "Chaesukdanggosiseon", "Gisiwon" and "Gosisangseok"

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As a way of finding out how the scholars in Ming and Ching Dynasties evaluated the poems made in Han Dynasty, 4 collection books of ancient poems such as "Gosigi","Chaesukdanggosiseon","Gisiwon" and "Gosisangseok" were selected for the comparative analysis of the poems made in Han Dynasty. These 4 collection books are something in common as they are the books of the old poems complied by the type of poems and that they have the same selection range.
As for the ratio of poems made in Han Dynasty among the total poems collected in 4 collection books, the poems made in Han Dynasty take up about 5.4% in Gosigi, and about 18% in Gosiwon. They take up as high as 15% in Gosisangseok, thus showing that the poems made in Han Dynasty were highly evaluated. As for the layout, in case of Chaesukdanggosiseon, the poems made in Han Dynasty are put in the front section of the collection books, unlike the layout made in other 3 collection books.
The poems made in Han Dynasty in 4 collection books of ancient poems were made in the list and, based on them, the characteristics of the poems made in Han Dynasty can be summarized as follows.
First, in Gosigi, Gosiwon and Gosisangseok, the poems whose authors are known are put in front section of the books, followed by the poems made by minganakbu and those whose authors are unknown while in Chaesukdanggosiseon, the poems made by minganakbu were put in the front section of the books.
Second, as for the ratio of minganakbu among the poems made in Han Dynasty in each collection books, it was high with 40.3% for Gosigi and 46.3% for Gosisangseok while it was the lowest with 36% in Gosiwon, thus showing the different evaluation for minganakbu. In addition, as for the type of minganakbu, there was no jipgayosa in Chaesukdanggosiseon, thus showing that there have been the different perspectives over the type of minganakbu.
Third, the fact that 65 poems which were made in Han Dynasty as acquired from the joint list of 4 collection books show that they are still highly appreciated even in the collection of books of poems made in Ming and Ching Dynasties.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이계주, "沈德潛詩學試論 -以《古詩源》 內涵批評觀点爲中心" 한국중국학회 (10) : 165-200, 2007

2 王宏林, "沈德潛詩學思想硏究" 人民出版社 2010

3 張偉, "論『古詩源』對『采菽堂古詩選』詩學思想的承襲" (04) : 2013

4 陳祚明, "采菽堂古詩選補遺 1" 上海古籍出版社 1995

5 陳祚明, "采菽堂古詩選 1" 上海古籍出版社 1995

6 郭茂倩, "樂府詩集 권1" 中華書局 1979

7 張玉谷, "古詩賞析 2" 上海古籍出版社 1995

8 張玉谷, "古詩賞析 1" 上海古籍出版社 1995

9 張玉谷, "古詩賞析" 富山房 1914

10 馮惟訥, "古詩紀 2" 臺灣商務印書館 1988

11 馮惟訥, "古詩紀 1" 臺灣商務印書館 1988

12 양회석, "古詩源 한시의 근원을 찾아서 Ⅰ" 全南大學校出版部 2015

13 沈德潛, "古詩源 卷1-14" 商務印書館 1719

14 沈德潛, "古詩源 上" 三民書局 2006

15 沈德潛, "古詩源" 中華書局 1993

16 胡建次, "中國古代詩歌選本的承傳" (01) : 2006

17 米峮, "『采菽堂古詩選』與『古詩源』甄別探微" (19) : 2012

18 米峮, "『采菽堂古詩選』與『古詩源』甄別探微" (19) : 2012

19 張中秋, "『古詩賞析』硏究" 河南大學 中國文學硏究所 2010

20 張中秋, "『古詩賞析』硏究" 河南大學 中國文學硏究所 2010

21 姜秉喆, "『古詩源』의 古代 詩歌와 元代 散曲에 반영된 中國 傳統詩歌觀에 대한 考察" 10 : 1998

22 김희경, "『古詩源』硏究" 전남대학교 2017