RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Deregulation of the Green-Belt and Revitalization of Economy in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104135812

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In 1946, South Korea had an estimated urban population of 2.83 million, or roughly 15% of the total population. Urban population dramatically increased before and after Korean War and 1960s' economic development. The increase of urban population causes a lot of problems, One of them was sprawl of city. Development-restricted zone system was introduced to keep urban sprawl during the high economic growth period of 1970s and 1980s and contributed to preservation of little green and open spaces in Seoul and other major cities. It reserved some often-spaces surrounding the cities for future development, and it made possible a long-term plan to meet the future land needs and thereby making a significant contribution to the healthy growths of the cities.
      Korean does not have clear and obvious standards for that differentiations between lawful regulation on real property and Korean version of regulatory takings even though Korean Constitutional Court has tried to develope some legal principles to adjudicate whether regulation over property rights is constitutional or not since it decided development-restricted zoning system as a nonconformity in 1998. Korean Constitutional Court has developed the rule against excessive restriction, non-delegation doctrine and payment of full compensation to adjudicate whether regulation over real property rights is constitutional or not. It is necessary to revitalize Korean current economic stagnation with de-regulating or lifting of the development restriction area, which can give some confidence for future investments and provides some protective measures for the owners of property inside the green belts in Korea. There are huge debates related to the proper role of the development restriction area system and proper protection of ownership of lands in Korea.
      번역하기

      In 1946, South Korea had an estimated urban population of 2.83 million, or roughly 15% of the total population. Urban population dramatically increased before and after Korean War and 1960s' economic development. The increase of urban population cause...

      In 1946, South Korea had an estimated urban population of 2.83 million, or roughly 15% of the total population. Urban population dramatically increased before and after Korean War and 1960s' economic development. The increase of urban population causes a lot of problems, One of them was sprawl of city. Development-restricted zone system was introduced to keep urban sprawl during the high economic growth period of 1970s and 1980s and contributed to preservation of little green and open spaces in Seoul and other major cities. It reserved some often-spaces surrounding the cities for future development, and it made possible a long-term plan to meet the future land needs and thereby making a significant contribution to the healthy growths of the cities.
      Korean does not have clear and obvious standards for that differentiations between lawful regulation on real property and Korean version of regulatory takings even though Korean Constitutional Court has tried to develope some legal principles to adjudicate whether regulation over property rights is constitutional or not since it decided development-restricted zoning system as a nonconformity in 1998. Korean Constitutional Court has developed the rule against excessive restriction, non-delegation doctrine and payment of full compensation to adjudicate whether regulation over real property rights is constitutional or not. It is necessary to revitalize Korean current economic stagnation with de-regulating or lifting of the development restriction area, which can give some confidence for future investments and provides some protective measures for the owners of property inside the green belts in Korea. There are huge debates related to the proper role of the development restriction area system and proper protection of ownership of lands in Korea.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 표명환, "헌법상 공용수용규정과 헌법재판소의 해석 법리에 관한 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 57 : 123-146, 2012

      2 Haksoo Ko, "Venture Capital in Korea? Special Law to Promote Venture Capital Companies" 15 (15): 2000

      3 Mary Ernesti, "T ahoe- Sierra Preservation Council, I nc. v. T ahoe Regional Planning Agency 122 S. Ct. 1465 ( 2002)" 11 (11): 2002

      4 Ronald J. Gilson, "Economically Benevolent Dictators: Lessons for Developing Democracies" 59 (59): 2011

      5 Youn Kyuong Park, "A Study on the Guarantee of Property Rights in the U.S. Constitution" SookMyung Womens University 2014

      1 표명환, "헌법상 공용수용규정과 헌법재판소의 해석 법리에 관한 고찰" 한국토지공법학회 57 : 123-146, 2012

      2 Haksoo Ko, "Venture Capital in Korea? Special Law to Promote Venture Capital Companies" 15 (15): 2000

      3 Mary Ernesti, "T ahoe- Sierra Preservation Council, I nc. v. T ahoe Regional Planning Agency 122 S. Ct. 1465 ( 2002)" 11 (11): 2002

      4 Ronald J. Gilson, "Economically Benevolent Dictators: Lessons for Developing Democracies" 59 (59): 2011

      5 Youn Kyuong Park, "A Study on the Guarantee of Property Rights in the U.S. Constitution" SookMyung Womens University 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2019-08-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> LAND LAW REVIEW KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-08-09 학술지등록 한글명 : 토지법학
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.34 0.34 0.42
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.37 0.38 0.614 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼