TOEIC 듣기평가에서 성취도에 따른 듣기전략별 남녀 대학생의 사용정도의 차이에 관하여 = The Differences of Using Amount of English Listening Strategies of Female and Male Students in TOEIC Listening Test Based on TOEIC Listening Score

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to examine the amount of English listening strategies used of female and male students in TOEIC listening test based on TOEIC listening score. Data were collected from 107 Korean college students who took TOEIC test in 2015, and a questionnaire was used as the tool for this study. The major findings of this study include: First, male students used more memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive and affective strategies than female students did without regardless of achievement group. Second, the preference of female and male students was similar in memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive and affective strategies use, but there were a little differences in the use of each strategy. Third, female students preferred to use ‘To listen with making an underline or a mark’in the use of cognitive strategies, Forth, female students of the low level group used more compensation strategies. Fifth, in the high level group, male students preferred to use ‘To try to focus on what they are listening’and ‘To listen with focusing on the details such as time, place and number’, but female students preferred to use ‘To guess next contents with looking over picture or passage’ and ‘To listen with focusing on repeated words and expressions’in the use of metacognitive strategies. Female students of the low level group used more ‘To try to listen with changing the focal points according to listening objectives’in the use of metacognitive strategies. Lastly, female students used more ‘To listen what is difficult to listen without paying attention to’and ‘To try to feel comfortable with decreasing tension and fear’in the use of affective strategies.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 대학생 학습자들이 TOEIC 듣기평가에서 사용하였던 듣기전략의 남녀별 사용정도의 차이를 살펴보았다. 이를 위하여 연구의 설문을 Bacon(1990)의 듣기학습전략을 참고로 하고, Oxford(1990)의 듣기학습전략 중, TOEIC 듣기전략에 알맞은 28개의 항목으로 구성하였다. 설문을 2015년도에 모의 TOEIC을 치른 대학생 107명(남학생 25명과 여학생 82명)을 대상으로 설문을 실시하였다. SPSS(Statistical Package for the Social Science) 23 프로그램을 이용하여 대학생 남녀별 듣기전략의 사용정도 차이를 살펴보기 위하여 빈도분석을 구하였고 평균비교를 위해 평균과 표준편차를 구하였다. 그리고 TOEIC 성취도 집단 간의 평균의 차이를 검증하기 위하여 t-test(검증)를 실시하였다. 28개 항목에 대하여 기억전략, 인지전략, 보상전략, 상위인지전략 그리고 정의적 전략 모두에서 상위집단과 하위집단을 가리지 않고 남자의 듣기전략별 사용정도가 여자보다 상대적으로 높았지만, 전략별 선호도의 순서도 비슷하였다. 다만 세부적 전략별로 남녀 간의 선호도의 차이가 있었고, 정의적 전략의 경우에는 하위집단에서 여자의 사용정도가 남자보다 높았다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정혜진, "영어 듣기 능숙도와 듣기 전략 사용에 관한 연구" 팬코리아영어교육학회 18 (18): 253-277, 2006

2 이정아, "듣기 전략 사용 선호도가 TOEIC 듣기 성취도에 미치는 영향과 매개 변인과의 관계" 한국영어어문교육학회 15 (15): 345-364, 2009

3 Park, G. P., "The effects of linguistic ability, background knowledge, and question types on EFL listening comprehension ability" 56 (56): 245-264, 2001

4 Park, G. P., "The effect of question presentation and question type on listening comprehension" 55 (55): 141-156, 2000

5 Vandergrift, L., "The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language (French) Listener" University of Alberta 1992

6 Charlier, B., "Technoligie et innovation en pédagogie" De Boeck 43-64, 2003

7 Shrum, J. L., "Teacher's Handbook : Contextualized Language Instruction" Heinle & Heinle 1994

8 임운, "TOEIC 성취도와 듣기전략 사용정도간의 상관관계에 관하여" 한국중앙영어영문학회 54 (54): 195-216, 2012

9 Vann, R. J., "Strategies of Unsuccessful Language Learners" 24 (24): 177-198, 1990

10 Brown, H. D., "Principles of Language Learning and Teaching" Prentice Hall Regents 1994

11 Carrel, P. L., "Metacognitive Strategy Training for ESL Reading" 23 : 647-678, 1989

12 Wenden, A. L., "Literature Review : The Process of Intervention" 33 : 103-121, 1983

13 O'Malley, J., "Learning Strategy Used by Beginning and Intermediate ESL Students" 35 : 21-46, 1985

14 O'Malley, J., "Learning Strategy Applications with Students of English as a Second Language" 19 : 285-296, 1985

15 O'Malley, J., "Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition" Cambridge University Press 1990

16 Wenden, A. L., "Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy" Prentice Hall 1991

17 Park, G. P., "Language Learning Strategy Use and ESL Proficiency" 4 (4): 57-67, 1997

18 Dreyer, C., "Language Learning Strategies around the World: Cross-Cultural Perspectives" University of Hawaii at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center 61-74, 1996

19 Oxford, R. L., "Language Learning Strategies : What Every Teacher Should Know?" Newbury House/Harper & Row 1990

20 Rubin, J., "How to be a More Successful Language Learner" Heinle & Heinle 1994

21 Alava, S., "Cyberspace et Formations Ouvertes" DE Boeck Université 2000

22 Bialystock, E., "Cognitive Psychology and its Implication" W. H. Freeman 1981

23 Corrales, O., "At a Loss for Words : The Use of Communication Strategies to Convey Lexical Meaning" 22 : 227-240, 1989

24 Bacon, S. M., "A Study of the Attitudes, Motives, and Strategies of University Foreign Language Students and their Disposition to Authentic Oral and Written Input" 74 (74): 459-473, 1990

25 Teng, H. C., "A Study of EFL Listening Comprehension Strategies" ERIC 1988

26 Philips, V., "A Look at Learner Strategy Use and ESL Proficiency" 4 (4): 57-67, 1991

27 Mendelsohn, D. J., "A Guide to the Teaching of Second Language Listening" Dominie 132-150, 1995

28 Green, J., "A Close Look at Learning Strategies, L2 proficiency and gender" 29 : 261-297, 1995