RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      초등학교의 수준별 교육과정 운영에 관한 연구 = The Study on the Implementation of Differentiated Curriculum in the Elementary Schools

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40116035

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to investigate into the actual state of implementation of the differentiated curriculum in the elementary schools and find out the problems about it. For this purpose, 364 teachers who taught 3rd or 4th graders in the 26 elementary schools were surveyed, and 11 teachers(in two groups) were participated in the focus group interviews. The major results obtained from this study are summarized as follows: 1. The necessity of the introduction of differentiated curriculum into National Curriculum is acknowledged. But the text contents for the advanced and supplemental learning are in large quantity and high degree of difficulty, which disturb the effective implementation of differentiated curriculum. 2. It showed the highest frequency that teachers taught all students in classes the basic, supplemental and advanced contents in texts. And the criteria of discriminating between the students for advanced learning and the students for supplemental learning are not precise. The teachers` personal guidance runs short in class, neither do the learning: materials for each level. 3. The special supplementary lessons for the low, achievers fell into difficult situation owing to the lack of mathematic teachers and appropriate learning materials. For lack of synthetic diagnosis, it was identified that these lessons have been implemented ineffective. The results gave suggestions in developing and implementing the differentiated curriculum in elementary schools as belows: 1. It needs to be checked whether the 3rd and 4th graders` social studies curricula in the elementary school should be developed as differentiated is valid or not. And, the text contents of three subjects(Korean language, mathematics, and social studies) need to be reduced in quantity and difficulty. 2. The definite standards like those of math, which divided students into the supplemental and the advanced course, need to be presented in the texts of social studies and Korean language. Teaching students the supplemental course or advanced course, teachers` personal guidance is to be emphasized along with the individual learning and cooperative learning. 3. To implement the special supplementary lessons for the low achievers with effective, it needs to supplement the teachers, to improve the quality of texts, and to diagnose the students` deficit carefully.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to investigate into the actual state of implementation of the differentiated curriculum in the elementary schools and find out the problems about it. For this purpose, 364 teachers who taught 3rd or 4th graders in the 26 ...

      The purpose of this study is to investigate into the actual state of implementation of the differentiated curriculum in the elementary schools and find out the problems about it. For this purpose, 364 teachers who taught 3rd or 4th graders in the 26 elementary schools were surveyed, and 11 teachers(in two groups) were participated in the focus group interviews. The major results obtained from this study are summarized as follows: 1. The necessity of the introduction of differentiated curriculum into National Curriculum is acknowledged. But the text contents for the advanced and supplemental learning are in large quantity and high degree of difficulty, which disturb the effective implementation of differentiated curriculum. 2. It showed the highest frequency that teachers taught all students in classes the basic, supplemental and advanced contents in texts. And the criteria of discriminating between the students for advanced learning and the students for supplemental learning are not precise. The teachers` personal guidance runs short in class, neither do the learning: materials for each level. 3. The special supplementary lessons for the low, achievers fell into difficult situation owing to the lack of mathematic teachers and appropriate learning materials. For lack of synthetic diagnosis, it was identified that these lessons have been implemented ineffective. The results gave suggestions in developing and implementing the differentiated curriculum in elementary schools as belows: 1. It needs to be checked whether the 3rd and 4th graders` social studies curricula in the elementary school should be developed as differentiated is valid or not. And, the text contents of three subjects(Korean language, mathematics, and social studies) need to be reduced in quantity and difficulty. 2. The definite standards like those of math, which divided students into the supplemental and the advanced course, need to be presented in the texts of social studies and Korean language. Teaching students the supplemental course or advanced course, teachers` personal guidance is to be emphasized along with the individual learning and cooperative learning. 3. To implement the special supplementary lessons for the low achievers with effective, it needs to supplement the teachers, to improve the quality of texts, and to diagnose the students` deficit carefully.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼