RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    A Suggestion on the Ethics in Artificial Intelligence

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Now and in the future, AI is inevitable and necessary for our lives in almost every respect. There are many aspects and consequences our use of AI and the AI itself (as an independent actor in the future) generate, some of which are good, valuable as intended and desired by us human beings, but some of which are bad, harmful, or dangerous whether it is intended or not.
    Ever since AI was started to be used, there has been a variety of discussions on the ethics which may work as guidelines for the regulation of its development and use. Some of the ethics have not yet become enforceable norm and some others exist already as a part of regulation enforceable under the power of governments. The designers or developers of such ethics are diverse from an individual to international organizations.
    Almost all of the AI Ethics are not sufficiently satisfying the requirements, needs, and hopes of the society members not only local level, but, national or international level. They lack something in ensuring to make all the stake-holders’ participation in developing the ethics and to achieve such key objectives as the accountability, explainability, traceability, no-bias, and privacy protection in the development, use, and improvement of AI.
    Based upon the review and analysis of the currently available AI Ethics, this article tries to find and suggest a method to design, develop, and improve continuously the AI Ethics through the National AI Ethics Platform where all the relevant stake-holders participate and exchange ideas and opinions together with the AI itself as a device to help, with its great capacity to deal with big data, all the processing and operation of the ethics through simulations utilizing all the input data provided by the participants and the situations surrounding the participants not in a static mode but a dynamic continuing mode.
    번역하기

    Now and in the future, AI is inevitable and necessary for our lives in almost every respect. There are many aspects and consequences our use of AI and the AI itself (as an independent actor in the future) generate, some of which are good, valuable as ...

    Now and in the future, AI is inevitable and necessary for our lives in almost every respect. There are many aspects and consequences our use of AI and the AI itself (as an independent actor in the future) generate, some of which are good, valuable as intended and desired by us human beings, but some of which are bad, harmful, or dangerous whether it is intended or not.
    Ever since AI was started to be used, there has been a variety of discussions on the ethics which may work as guidelines for the regulation of its development and use. Some of the ethics have not yet become enforceable norm and some others exist already as a part of regulation enforceable under the power of governments. The designers or developers of such ethics are diverse from an individual to international organizations.
    Almost all of the AI Ethics are not sufficiently satisfying the requirements, needs, and hopes of the society members not only local level, but, national or international level. They lack something in ensuring to make all the stake-holders’ participation in developing the ethics and to achieve such key objectives as the accountability, explainability, traceability, no-bias, and privacy protection in the development, use, and improvement of AI.
    Based upon the review and analysis of the currently available AI Ethics, this article tries to find and suggest a method to design, develop, and improve continuously the AI Ethics through the National AI Ethics Platform where all the relevant stake-holders participate and exchange ideas and opinions together with the AI itself as a device to help, with its great capacity to deal with big data, all the processing and operation of the ethics through simulations utilizing all the input data provided by the participants and the situations surrounding the participants not in a static mode but a dynamic continuing mode.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한국인공지능법학회, "인공지능과 법" 박영사 17-21, 2019

    2 김효은, "의사결정 자동화에 대한 대응으로서의 인공지능윤리 교육" 한국윤리교육학회 (55) : 277-308, 2020

    3 이현주, "윤리경영과 기업윤리 용어 개념에 대한 이론적 고찰" 한국윤리경영학회 12 (12): 4-10, 2010

    4 "www.nia.or.kr"

    5 "https://www.businessinsider.de/apple-ceo-tim-cook-on-privacy-the-free-market-is-not-working-regulations-2018-11"

    6 "https://www.boannews.com/media/view.asp?idx=69939&kind=2"

    7 "https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/https://www.seedtoken.io/"

    8 Paula Boddington, "Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence" Springer 2017

    9 René von Schomberg, "Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields" European Commission 2011

    10 Alan FT Winfield, "Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems" Springer International Publishing 2017

    1 한국인공지능법학회, "인공지능과 법" 박영사 17-21, 2019

    2 김효은, "의사결정 자동화에 대한 대응으로서의 인공지능윤리 교육" 한국윤리교육학회 (55) : 277-308, 2020

    3 이현주, "윤리경영과 기업윤리 용어 개념에 대한 이론적 고찰" 한국윤리경영학회 12 (12): 4-10, 2010

    4 "www.nia.or.kr"

    5 "https://www.businessinsider.de/apple-ceo-tim-cook-on-privacy-the-free-market-is-not-working-regulations-2018-11"

    6 "https://www.boannews.com/media/view.asp?idx=69939&kind=2"

    7 "https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/https://www.seedtoken.io/"

    8 Paula Boddington, "Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence" Springer 2017

    9 René von Schomberg, "Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields" European Commission 2011

    10 Alan FT Winfield, "Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems" Springer International Publishing 2017

    11 Kate Crawford, "There Is a Blind Spot in AI Research" 538 : 311-, 2016

    12 Vinuesa, R., "The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals" 11 (11): 1-10, 2020

    13 European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, "Statement on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and ‘Autonomous’ Systems" 2018

    14 Wigel, V., "SophoLab: Experimental Computational Philosophy" 3 : 2007

    15 Luengo-Oroz, M., "Solidarity should be a core ethical principle of AI" 1 (1): 2019

    16 Jacob Turner, "Robot Rules - Regulating Artificial Intelligence" Palgrave Macmillan 2019

    17 "Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC"

    18 National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology, "Preparing For the Future of Artificial Intelligence" Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) 2016

    19 State Council of China, "New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan"

    20 Rahwan, I., "Machine behaviour" 568 (568): 2019

    21 "Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy"

    22 Pastor-Escuredo, D., "How computation is helping unravel the dynamics of morphogenesis" (8) : 2020

    23 Cédric Villani, "For a Meaningful Artificial Intelligence - Towards a French and European Strategy"

    24 Virginia Dignum, "Ethics by Design: Necessity or Curse?" ACM Press 2018

    25 European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (HLEG), "Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI"

    26 LeCun, Y., "Deep learning" 521 (521): 436-444, 2016

    27 Paul Nemitz, "Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence" The Royal Society 376 (376): 20180089-, 2018

    28 "Big Standard Korean Dictionary published by the National Institute of Korean Language (In Korean: 국립국어원 표준국어대사전)"

    29 "Article 750 of Korean Civil Code.(In Korean: 대한민국 민법 750조)"

    30 "Article 13 of Korean Criminal Code. (In Korean: 대한민국 형법 13조)"

    31 House of Commons, "Algorithms in Decision-Making, Fourth Report of Session 2017-19"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-17 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Institute for Legal Studies KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.78 0.78 0.74
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.75 0.76 0.82 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼