RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공기업의 인사고과평정자간 신뢰도 분석 = Articles of General Interest : The Inter - rater Reliability of Performance Appraisal in Public Corporation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19686110

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the field of social science, it is very important to be confident about the reliability and validity of evaluation. The reliability of evaluation is generally divided into two dimensions, inter-rater reliability and reliability of the instrument. Inter-rater reliability is a measure of consistency and agreement between separate evaluators rating the same piece of behavior or situation. High levels of consistency and agreement indicate high inter-rater reliability. The purpose of this study is to review the inter-rater reliability of a performance appraisal system which is one of the most fundamental systems in Human Resource Management(HRM) in public corporation. As well, recommendations are made for establishing a sound performance appraisal system. The results of this study show that there was little inter-rater agreement. That is, inter-rater reliability was unacceptably low. To improve inter-rater reliability, we have to find ways to train evaluators so that their ratings are closer to each other. The results also imply that the Rating Scale Method should be less favored than the BARS(Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales) to reduce rating errors. It is imperative to have a systematic understanding of a performance appraisal to maximize the effectiveness of HRM in the context of the new HRM paradigm.
    번역하기

    In the field of social science, it is very important to be confident about the reliability and validity of evaluation. The reliability of evaluation is generally divided into two dimensions, inter-rater reliability and reliability of the instrument. I...

    In the field of social science, it is very important to be confident about the reliability and validity of evaluation. The reliability of evaluation is generally divided into two dimensions, inter-rater reliability and reliability of the instrument. Inter-rater reliability is a measure of consistency and agreement between separate evaluators rating the same piece of behavior or situation. High levels of consistency and agreement indicate high inter-rater reliability. The purpose of this study is to review the inter-rater reliability of a performance appraisal system which is one of the most fundamental systems in Human Resource Management(HRM) in public corporation. As well, recommendations are made for establishing a sound performance appraisal system. The results of this study show that there was little inter-rater agreement. That is, inter-rater reliability was unacceptably low. To improve inter-rater reliability, we have to find ways to train evaluators so that their ratings are closer to each other. The results also imply that the Rating Scale Method should be less favored than the BARS(Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales) to reduce rating errors. It is imperative to have a systematic understanding of a performance appraisal to maximize the effectiveness of HRM in the context of the new HRM paradigm.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.69 1.69 1.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.83 1.8 1.759 0.69
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼