RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      秋史 金正喜의 書藝形態論에 대한 考察 = A Study on Chusa Gim, Jeonghui’s Morphology of Calligraphy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102089289

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aimed at investigating Chusa Gim, Jeonghui(1786-1856)’s morphology of calligraphy, which was one of his calligraphic theories. It categorized the morphology into four laws: wielding brush, structuring, disposing and using ink. The first is the law of wielding brush. Chusa emphasized the law of wielding brush and insisted on attaining a state of form and a flavor through the correlation and the variation of a square stroke and a circle stroke and the management of an upright brush and a tilted brush. Also, he considered that the law of wielding brush was profoundly concealed and its life and death were determined according to whether it attained the principle or not. In addition, he emphasized a harmonious management of a fast stroke and a slow stroke and the principle of reversing at entering and tilting at exiting. Furthermore, he explained a stroke as the principle of yin and yang, and he thought that a stroke of yin and a stroke of yang were not fixed but accommodate to circumstance. The second is the law of structuring. Chusa insisted that structuring was the same as plotting by quoting Map of Strokes Disposition. It said that it would be collapsed without a plot even if weapon and armor were sophisticated, soldiers were agile, and fortress was entrenched. Moreover, he emphasized that calligraphers should be cautious about that they unavoidably resisted the old law and that they could go downhill if they only exercised a sharp edge without attaining an empty and profound flavor. The third is the law of disposing. Chusa emphasized that elegance of points and strokes and profundity of convexness and concaveness, up and down and reflection and response should be satisfied in the condition of disposing. Blank is the space which is not congested but lively and infinitive, and it is the significant formative factor that points and strokes are mingled in. A formative consciousness is based on the cognitive system that does not cognize it as a limited section but considers it as a figment in the universal space which diachronically moves. The forth is the law of using ink. Chusa expressed that calligraphers should make efforts to use ink well because the characters on paper were only written with ink. Calligraphers regard ink as the highest, and they consider brush as a tool for using ink. Also, he indicated that calligraphers should effectively utilize thick, thin, smooth and rough ink in the right places. Chusa’s morphology of calligraphy is significant in the sense that it cognizes the formative thinking of that accomplishment and solid qualities are equally blended, which indicates both the spiritual beauty the formative beauty should be managed together.
      번역하기

      This study aimed at investigating Chusa Gim, Jeonghui(1786-1856)’s morphology of calligraphy, which was one of his calligraphic theories. It categorized the morphology into four laws: wielding brush, structuring, disposing and using ink. The first i...

      This study aimed at investigating Chusa Gim, Jeonghui(1786-1856)’s morphology of calligraphy, which was one of his calligraphic theories. It categorized the morphology into four laws: wielding brush, structuring, disposing and using ink. The first is the law of wielding brush. Chusa emphasized the law of wielding brush and insisted on attaining a state of form and a flavor through the correlation and the variation of a square stroke and a circle stroke and the management of an upright brush and a tilted brush. Also, he considered that the law of wielding brush was profoundly concealed and its life and death were determined according to whether it attained the principle or not. In addition, he emphasized a harmonious management of a fast stroke and a slow stroke and the principle of reversing at entering and tilting at exiting. Furthermore, he explained a stroke as the principle of yin and yang, and he thought that a stroke of yin and a stroke of yang were not fixed but accommodate to circumstance. The second is the law of structuring. Chusa insisted that structuring was the same as plotting by quoting Map of Strokes Disposition. It said that it would be collapsed without a plot even if weapon and armor were sophisticated, soldiers were agile, and fortress was entrenched. Moreover, he emphasized that calligraphers should be cautious about that they unavoidably resisted the old law and that they could go downhill if they only exercised a sharp edge without attaining an empty and profound flavor. The third is the law of disposing. Chusa emphasized that elegance of points and strokes and profundity of convexness and concaveness, up and down and reflection and response should be satisfied in the condition of disposing. Blank is the space which is not congested but lively and infinitive, and it is the significant formative factor that points and strokes are mingled in. A formative consciousness is based on the cognitive system that does not cognize it as a limited section but considers it as a figment in the universal space which diachronically moves. The forth is the law of using ink. Chusa expressed that calligraphers should make efforts to use ink well because the characters on paper were only written with ink. Calligraphers regard ink as the highest, and they consider brush as a tool for using ink. Also, he indicated that calligraphers should effectively utilize thick, thin, smooth and rough ink in the right places. Chusa’s morphology of calligraphy is significant in the sense that it cognizes the formative thinking of that accomplishment and solid qualities are equally blended, which indicates both the spiritual beauty the formative beauty should be managed together.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序言
      • Ⅱ. 書藝形態論 分析
      • 1. 運筆法
      • 2. 結構法
      • 3. 章法
      • Ⅰ. 序言
      • Ⅱ. 書藝形態論 分析
      • 1. 運筆法
      • 2. 結構法
      • 3. 章法
      • 4. 墨法
      • Ⅲ. 結語
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 장지훈, "조선조후기 서예미학사상 연구" 성균관대학교 대학원 2007

      2 金光郁, "韓國의 論書詩 硏究" 檀國大學校 大學院 2006

      3 金光郁, "韓國書藝詩硏究" 啓明大學校出版部 2006

      4 金光郁, "韓國書藝學史" 啓明大學校出版部 2009

      5 金正喜, "阮堂先生全集" 永生堂

      6 金光郁, "行草書美學" 啓明大學校出版部 2010

      7 金正喜, "秋史集" 玄岩社 1981

      8 金光郁, "秋史書論硏究" 弘益大學校 敎育大學院 1991

      9 李起範, "淸代 論書詩에 나타난 學書傾向과 書藝美學" 誠信女子大學校 大學院 2011

      10 華正人, "歷代書法論文選" 華正書局 1988

      1 장지훈, "조선조후기 서예미학사상 연구" 성균관대학교 대학원 2007

      2 金光郁, "韓國의 論書詩 硏究" 檀國大學校 大學院 2006

      3 金光郁, "韓國書藝詩硏究" 啓明大學校出版部 2006

      4 金光郁, "韓國書藝學史" 啓明大學校出版部 2009

      5 金正喜, "阮堂先生全集" 永生堂

      6 金光郁, "行草書美學" 啓明大學校出版部 2010

      7 金正喜, "秋史集" 玄岩社 1981

      8 金光郁, "秋史書論硏究" 弘益大學校 敎育大學院 1991

      9 李起範, "淸代 論書詩에 나타난 學書傾向과 書藝美學" 誠信女子大學校 大學院 2011

      10 華正人, "歷代書法論文選" 華正書局 1988

      11 金光郁, "書藝學槪論" 啓明大學校出版部 2007

      12 金應顯, "書與其人" 民族文化文庫刊行會 1987

      13 包世臣, "廣藝舟雙楫" 華正書局 1985

      14 金正喜, "國譯 阮堂全集" 솔 1996

      15 "周易" 保景文化社 1981

      16 劉詩, "中國古代書法家" 文物出版社 1991

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.27 0.27 0.24
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.25 0.2 0.633 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼