RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    신탁수익권과 강제집행

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103130493

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In pradice, beneficial interest in a trust is deemed to be an enforceable right and civil execution thereto is of high importance to praditioners, This paper deals with sever legal and pradical issues in drawing limits with regard to foreclosure of beneficial interest by trust beneficiary’s creditor(s) , in order to provide
    interpreting guidelines when attaching trust interest Under the reformed Korean Trust Ccxle enaded in July 26, 2012, although the gist of beneficial interest is the right for the trust beneficiary to avail himself/herself of the trust property (mainly cash or property) , the beneficial interest as the whole includes any α all rights and/or interests empowered to the beneficiary, indicating that the beneficiary should be afforded more protedions than general creditors with regard to the trust However, the creditors of the beneficiary are only permitted to reach the beneficial interest in a trust (not trust property itself due to the asset partitioning fundion of trusts) and, in the civil execution
    process, to attach such the interest in the hands of a third party, i.e, trustee When creditors attach the interest owned by beneficiary in the trust, the writ of attachment shall apply not only to the principal but future interest which would
    accrue and be distributed to the beneficiary after the attachment goes into effed, For a self-settled trust, the settlor is prohibited from changing the beneficiary in manner which would infringe upon the court’s attachment order. For a third-party trust, the settlor is allowed to change the beneficiary if the trust is revocable trust
    The trust parties, the settlor and the trustee, still have the power to change the trust itself without affeding the writ of attachment representing the creditor s interest Also, in the case of a self-settled trust, even the right to change the beneficiary has been granted to the trustee, a change in the beneficiary would have the same effed as disposal of the beneficial trust; therefore, foreclosure prohibits such change in the beneficiary,
    A spendthrift trust provision refers to particular language contained the trust instrument which creates an irrevocable trust that prevents creditors from attaching beneficial interest before the interest is adually distributed to the beneficiary, Many jurisdidions in the United States recognize the validity of spendthrift provisions;
    several states (Alaska being the pioneer) have even amended their laws to permit spendthrift provisions in self-settled trusts, However, the English courts have not accepted spendthrift provisions, When considering the various aspeds of mapr academic and pradical viewpoints, it appears unlikely that the Korean courts would
    be willing to accept spendthrift provisions.
    Also this paper provides detailed legal ana1ysis on the recent Korean Supreme Court case which ruled that attachment to the beneficial interest covers the beneficiary’s distributed interest in terms of terminating the trust (Supreme Court case No. 2013Da15654 decided on March 24th, 2016)
    번역하기

    In pradice, beneficial interest in a trust is deemed to be an enforceable right and civil execution thereto is of high importance to praditioners, This paper deals with sever legal and pradical issues in drawing limits with regard to foreclosure of be...

    In pradice, beneficial interest in a trust is deemed to be an enforceable right and civil execution thereto is of high importance to praditioners, This paper deals with sever legal and pradical issues in drawing limits with regard to foreclosure of beneficial interest by trust beneficiary’s creditor(s) , in order to provide
    interpreting guidelines when attaching trust interest Under the reformed Korean Trust Ccxle enaded in July 26, 2012, although the gist of beneficial interest is the right for the trust beneficiary to avail himself/herself of the trust property (mainly cash or property) , the beneficial interest as the whole includes any α all rights and/or interests empowered to the beneficiary, indicating that the beneficiary should be afforded more protedions than general creditors with regard to the trust However, the creditors of the beneficiary are only permitted to reach the beneficial interest in a trust (not trust property itself due to the asset partitioning fundion of trusts) and, in the civil execution
    process, to attach such the interest in the hands of a third party, i.e, trustee When creditors attach the interest owned by beneficiary in the trust, the writ of attachment shall apply not only to the principal but future interest which would
    accrue and be distributed to the beneficiary after the attachment goes into effed, For a self-settled trust, the settlor is prohibited from changing the beneficiary in manner which would infringe upon the court’s attachment order. For a third-party trust, the settlor is allowed to change the beneficiary if the trust is revocable trust
    The trust parties, the settlor and the trustee, still have the power to change the trust itself without affeding the writ of attachment representing the creditor s interest Also, in the case of a self-settled trust, even the right to change the beneficiary has been granted to the trustee, a change in the beneficiary would have the same effed as disposal of the beneficial trust; therefore, foreclosure prohibits such change in the beneficiary,
    A spendthrift trust provision refers to particular language contained the trust instrument which creates an irrevocable trust that prevents creditors from attaching beneficial interest before the interest is adually distributed to the beneficiary, Many jurisdidions in the United States recognize the validity of spendthrift provisions;
    several states (Alaska being the pioneer) have even amended their laws to permit spendthrift provisions in self-settled trusts, However, the English courts have not accepted spendthrift provisions, When considering the various aspeds of mapr academic and pradical viewpoints, it appears unlikely that the Korean courts would
    be willing to accept spendthrift provisions.
    Also this paper provides detailed legal ana1ysis on the recent Korean Supreme Court case which ruled that attachment to the beneficial interest covers the beneficiary’s distributed interest in terms of terminating the trust (Supreme Court case No. 2013Da15654 decided on March 24th, 2016)

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼