RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      외교활동과 예론을 통해서 본 이정구의 현실인식

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76380830

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper examines the life of Lee Jeong-Gu, one of high civil officials in the mid-Joseon period. He served as a diplomat at the turbulent time, when the dynasty suffered the invasions of the Japanese army and the powerful Jurchen Manchus. As a westerner he was attacked from big northerners several times. And he witnessed the deposal of Kwanghaegun which took Injo to the throne. War, infectious diseases, famine and factional strife were the symbols of his day. Under such circumstances how he behaved, especially in the diplomatic relations with the Manchurians and the ritual disputes during kings Kwanghaegun and Injo, is the main subject of the paper. Lee Jeong-Gu spoke Chinese fluently, and had outstanding writing skills. He also had acute judgements. Then he could deal with many diplomatic conflicts. Obviously he was one of the scholars with the attitude of sadae(serving the great), but not a stubborn Confucian fundamentalist. As a career diplomat he didn't hesitate making strategic decision for the benefit of the nation. Such flexibility made him serve the government of the opposite northerners. And his long illness worked good for his public service. As for the ritual disputes, he didn't sometimes agree with kings Kwanghaegun and Injo on the basis of the principle of the ritual. But once it was decided upon, he dared to accept the role of the envoy to report the result to China. Thus some historiographer even criticized him for his irresolution. In my view, his flexibility, not indecision, was rather a virtue desperately necessary to the intellectuals of the times, in retrospect of the rough history of the Joseon dynasty after his death.
      번역하기

      This paper examines the life of Lee Jeong-Gu, one of high civil officials in the mid-Joseon period. He served as a diplomat at the turbulent time, when the dynasty suffered the invasions of the Japanese army and the powerful Jurchen Manchus. As a west...

      This paper examines the life of Lee Jeong-Gu, one of high civil officials in the mid-Joseon period. He served as a diplomat at the turbulent time, when the dynasty suffered the invasions of the Japanese army and the powerful Jurchen Manchus. As a westerner he was attacked from big northerners several times. And he witnessed the deposal of Kwanghaegun which took Injo to the throne. War, infectious diseases, famine and factional strife were the symbols of his day. Under such circumstances how he behaved, especially in the diplomatic relations with the Manchurians and the ritual disputes during kings Kwanghaegun and Injo, is the main subject of the paper. Lee Jeong-Gu spoke Chinese fluently, and had outstanding writing skills. He also had acute judgements. Then he could deal with many diplomatic conflicts. Obviously he was one of the scholars with the attitude of sadae(serving the great), but not a stubborn Confucian fundamentalist. As a career diplomat he didn't hesitate making strategic decision for the benefit of the nation. Such flexibility made him serve the government of the opposite northerners. And his long illness worked good for his public service. As for the ritual disputes, he didn't sometimes agree with kings Kwanghaegun and Injo on the basis of the principle of the ritual. But once it was decided upon, he dared to accept the role of the envoy to report the result to China. Thus some historiographer even criticized him for his irresolution. In my view, his flexibility, not indecision, was rather a virtue desperately necessary to the intellectuals of the times, in retrospect of the rough history of the Joseon dynasty after his death.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 들어가는 말
      • II. 전란과 역병의 시대, 각종 병고에 시달렸던 삶
      • III. 명과 후금과의 외교에서 명분과 국익을 추구하다
      • IV. 광해군과 인조조의 예론에서 국왕과 갈등을 빚다
      • V. 맺는 말
      • I. 들어가는 말
      • II. 전란과 역병의 시대, 각종 병고에 시달렸던 삶
      • III. 명과 후금과의 외교에서 명분과 국익을 추구하다
      • IV. 광해군과 인조조의 예론에서 국왕과 갈등을 빚다
      • V. 맺는 말
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 車溶柱, "李廷龜 硏究" 2 : 1999

      2 楊雨뢰, "李廷龜의 詩文을 통해서 본 明代 中?韓文化交流" 국학연구원 139 (139): 315-346, 2007

      3 김호, "허준의 동의보감연구" 일지사 2000

      4 "인조실록"

      5 정두희, "송시열 in : 조선시대 인물의 재발견" 일조각 1997

      6 "선조실록"

      7 김학수, "끝내 세상에 고개를 숙이지 않는다" 삼우반 2005

      8 "광해군일기"

      9 한명기, "광해군" 역사비평사 2000

      10 "谿谷集"

      1 車溶柱, "李廷龜 硏究" 2 : 1999

      2 楊雨뢰, "李廷龜의 詩文을 통해서 본 明代 中?韓文化交流" 국학연구원 139 (139): 315-346, 2007

      3 김호, "허준의 동의보감연구" 일지사 2000

      4 "인조실록"

      5 정두희, "송시열 in : 조선시대 인물의 재발견" 일조각 1997

      6 "선조실록"

      7 김학수, "끝내 세상에 고개를 숙이지 않는다" 삼우반 2005

      8 "광해군일기"

      9 한명기, "광해군" 역사비평사 2000

      10 "谿谷集"

      11 "澤堂集"

      12 정두희, "朝鮮時代의 臺諫硏究" 일조각 1994

      13 李鍾燦, "月沙의 文學觀과 辨誣錄" 2 : 1977

      14 "月沙集"

      15 朴英鎬, "月沙 李廷龜의 文學觀 硏究" 5 : 1989

      16 吳世炫, "月沙 李廷龜(1564~1635)의 文翰活動과 學統意識" 51 : 2005

      17 盧京姬, "月沙 李廷龜 漢詩 硏究 -官僚文人으로서의 立地와 그 詩世界-" 8 : 2003

      18 禹應順, "光海朝 時期 李廷龜의 현실적 처지와 시세계" 3 : 2000

      19 韓明基, "光海君代의 大北勢力과 政局의 動向" 20 : 1988

      20 허지은, "丁應泰의朝鮮誣告事件을 통해 본 조명관계" 한국사학회 76 (76): 169-205, 2004

      21 宋俊浩, "Wagner-宋朝鮮文科榜目"

      22 Wagner, Edward, "The literati Purges: Political Conflict in Early Yi Korea" Harvard University Press 1974

      23 박종기, "5백년 고려사" 푸른역사 1999

      24 김학수, "17세기의 名門 -延安李氏 月沙家門-" 10-, 2000

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.4 0.4 0.49
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.43 1.181 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼