이정(李楨) 『구암집(龜巖集)』 수록 작품의 작자에 대한 재검토 = A Study on the Author of Texts Included in 『Gu-amjip(龜巖集)』

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The aim of this article is to analyze the author of texts included in 『Gu-am jip(龜巖集) 』. Gu-am(龜巖) Yi Jeong(李楨) is a disciple of Toe-gae(退溪) Yi Hwang(李滉). And He was close to Nam-myung(南冥) Jo Shik(曺植). Until now, many researchers have studied on the various aspects of Yi Jeong, for example his philosophical ideology, literture, educational view and so on. Their studies were based on the texts of 『Gu-am jip』. By the way, the texts of 『Gu-am jip』 have some problems. It is questionable whether or not several texts of 『Gu-am jip』 was really written by Yi Jeong. So I analysized the real author of those texts. I found twenty-eight doubtful texts in 『Gu-am jip』. To put it concretely, twenty-four poems in 『Gu-am jip』 are included in the work of No Su-shin(盧守愼) on 『So-jae jip(소齋集) 』 and one peom in 『Gu-am jip』 is included in the work of Gi Dae-sueng(奇大升) on 『Go-bong jip(高峯集) 』. Also, two pieces of Gi(記) in 『Gu-am jip』 are included in the work of Yoon Chun-nyon(尹春年) on 『Hak-eum go(學音稿) 』 and 『Yi-am yugo(이庵遺稿) 』, a piece of letter in 『Gu-am jip』 is included in the work of Yi yi(李珥) on 『Yul-gok Jeonseo(栗谷全書) 』and 『Yi-am yugo(이庵遺稿) 』. So I analsyized the author of those texts. As a result, I assume that the author of those texts is not Yi Jeong. Because, the situations expressed in those poems don`t correspond with the life of Yi Jeong. On the other hand, most of situations expressed in poems correspond with No Su-shin. So I think that the author of twenty-four poems is No Su-shin. And I think that two pieces of Gi - 「Gwan-i-dang gi(觀이堂記)」 and 「Yi-am gi(이庵記)」 are the work of Yoon Chun-nyon and a piece of letter - 「Yeosongiam (與宋이庵)」 is the work of Yi yi. The reason is that the contextual background of those works doesn`t correspond with the lifetime of Yi Jeong. I agree that my assumption may have some problems. But it is certain that reseachers should be more careful to study on those doubtful texts of 『Gu-am jip』. In this article, I couldn`t conclude why the doubtful texts was included in 『Gu-am jip』. I want to find out cause of this problem through an another study.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 鄭羽洛, "？中庸？이 龜巖 李楨의 文學에 미친 影響" 동방한문학회 25 : 171-212, 2003

2 李珥, "栗谷全書" 민족문화추진회 1988

3 설석규, "嶺南士林의 分化와 龜巖 李楨의 역할" 역사교육학회 36 : 227-267, 2006

4 이승진, "텍스트 비평의 이론과 실제 - 역사 ․ 비평본 편집의 기초작업 -" 외국문학연구소 (49) : 353-378, 2013

5 신승운, "율곡전서해제" 민족문화추진회 1988

6 안대회, "윤춘년(尹春年)의 『학음고(學音稿)』, 그 의의와 가치" 동방고전문학회 2 : 257-270, 2000

7 李楨, "龜巖集, 原集 初刊本"

8 李楨, "龜巖集 續集 初刊本"

9 李楨, "龜巖集 影印標點本" 민족문화추진회 1988

10 金忠甲, "龜巖集"

11 이수건, "龜巖思想 學術集" 泗川文化院 15-76, 2005

12 안현주, "龜巖 李楨의 圖書刊行에 관한 硏究" 한국도서관·정보학회 42 (42): 339-367, 2011

13 이세동, "龜巖 李楨의 中庸學" 퇴계연구소 (44) : 265-300, 2009

14 정우락, "龜巖 李楨 연구의 반성적 모색" 퇴계연구소 (52) : 51-82, 2013

15 宋寅, "頤庵遺稿 重刊本"

16 宋寅, "頤庵遺稿"

17 황위주, "退溪와 龜巖의 往復書翰" 퇴계연구소 (47) : 309-341, 2010

18 정만조, "宣祖初 晉州 淫婦獄과 그 波紋" 국민대학교 22 : 69-94, 2000

19 尹春年, "學音稿"

20 오이환, "大觀臺 緣起 ―李楨과 曺植의 관계를 중심으로―" 경남문화연구원 (31) : 305-341, 2011

21 曺植, "南冥集" 민족문화추진회 1988

22 신병주, "『龜巖集』 해제" 경상대학교 남명학연구소 10 : 1-17, 2000

23 서정문, "『龜巖集』 해제" 민족문화추진회 1988

24 김기빈, "『頤庵遺稿』 해제" 민족문화추진회 1988

25 신승운, "『穌齋集』 해제" 민족문화추진회 1988

26 윤상기, "「鏤板考」에 수록된 경남지역 서원 藏板 - 서원 刊板을 대상으로 -" 한국서지학회 (50) : 187-230, 2011