RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    공급망 참여 기업 사이의 지식 교환 = 거래비용 이론과 사회자본 이론 관점의 비교

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856736

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The review of existing literature on knowledge exchange among supply chain partners reveals that there are two essential forces at work: (1) collaborative behavior ? i.e., firms willing to share knowledge with supply chain partners in order to leverage social capital, and (2) opportunistic behavior ? i.e., firms wanting to maintain some degrees of knowledge/information asymmetry to manage supply chain partners’ behaviors. These forces behind knowledge exchange dynamics may be in resonance and in conflict simultaneously. Concurrent assessment of the opposing theories and the contingencies under which each is relevant for the supply chain performance is a useful research undertaking. Based on literature review, we have identified supply chain context as an important contingency for inter-firm knowledge exchange. We have used data from a field study of Korean firms in the electronics manufacturing services (EMS) industry to test the proposed research model. Our findings indicate that, in upstream supply chain relationships, inter-firm trust among supply chain partners has a positive impact on knowledge exchange, while transaction risk concerns does not influence knowledge exchange. In downstream supply chain relationships, neither transaction risk concerns about inter-firm knowledge exchange, nor social capital perspectives influences knowledge exchange significantly. These findings have important theoretical and practical implications, which are discussed in the paper.
    번역하기

    The review of existing literature on knowledge exchange among supply chain partners reveals that there are two essential forces at work: (1) collaborative behavior ? i.e., firms willing to share knowledge with supply chain partners in order to leverag...

    The review of existing literature on knowledge exchange among supply chain partners reveals that there are two essential forces at work: (1) collaborative behavior ? i.e., firms willing to share knowledge with supply chain partners in order to leverage social capital, and (2) opportunistic behavior ? i.e., firms wanting to maintain some degrees of knowledge/information asymmetry to manage supply chain partners’ behaviors. These forces behind knowledge exchange dynamics may be in resonance and in conflict simultaneously. Concurrent assessment of the opposing theories and the contingencies under which each is relevant for the supply chain performance is a useful research undertaking. Based on literature review, we have identified supply chain context as an important contingency for inter-firm knowledge exchange. We have used data from a field study of Korean firms in the electronics manufacturing services (EMS) industry to test the proposed research model. Our findings indicate that, in upstream supply chain relationships, inter-firm trust among supply chain partners has a positive impact on knowledge exchange, while transaction risk concerns does not influence knowledge exchange. In downstream supply chain relationships, neither transaction risk concerns about inter-firm knowledge exchange, nor social capital perspectives influences knowledge exchange significantly. These findings have important theoretical and practical implications, which are discussed in the paper.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김경규, "전자적 정보공유와 상대적 흡수능력이 공급망 성과에미치는 영향에 관한 연구- Downstream Supply Chain을 중심으로 -" 한국경영학회 34 (34): 1869-1894, 2005

    2 Lee,F., "When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations" 72 : 336-363, 1997

    3 Weill,P., "What IT Infrastructure Capabilities are Needed to Implement E-Business Models?" 1 (1): 17-34, 2002

    4 Tardif,V., "Understanding forecast variability in contract electronics manufacturing" 11 (11): 137-148, 2002

    5 Levin,D., "The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer" 50 (50): 1477-1490, 2004

    6 Dyer,J.H., "The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea" 14 (14): 57-68, 2003

    7 Dirks,K., "The role of trust in organizational settings" 12 : 450-467, 2001

    8 Hsiao, R., "The problem of embeddedness: knowledge transfer, situated practice, and the role of information systems" 36-46, 2003

    9 Pfeffer, J, "The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective" Harper & Row 1978

    10 Zhu,K., "The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and ecommerce capability:A resource-based assessment of their business value" 21 (21): 167-202, 2004

    1 김경규, "전자적 정보공유와 상대적 흡수능력이 공급망 성과에미치는 영향에 관한 연구- Downstream Supply Chain을 중심으로 -" 한국경영학회 34 (34): 1869-1894, 2005

    2 Lee,F., "When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help seeking and power motivation in organizations" 72 : 336-363, 1997

    3 Weill,P., "What IT Infrastructure Capabilities are Needed to Implement E-Business Models?" 1 (1): 17-34, 2002

    4 Tardif,V., "Understanding forecast variability in contract electronics manufacturing" 11 (11): 137-148, 2002

    5 Levin,D., "The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer" 50 (50): 1477-1490, 2004

    6 Dyer,J.H., "The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea" 14 (14): 57-68, 2003

    7 Dirks,K., "The role of trust in organizational settings" 12 : 450-467, 2001

    8 Hsiao, R., "The problem of embeddedness: knowledge transfer, situated practice, and the role of information systems" 36-46, 2003

    9 Pfeffer, J, "The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective" Harper & Row 1978

    10 Zhu,K., "The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and ecommerce capability:A resource-based assessment of their business value" 21 (21): 167-202, 2004

    11 Dyer,J.H., "The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Inter=organizational Competitive Advantage" . 23 (23): 660-679, 1998

    12 Bourdieu,P., "The Forms of Capital, in Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education" Greenwood 241-258, 1986

    13 Williamson,O., "The Economics Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting" Free Press 1985

    14 Shuen,A., "Technology sourcing and learning strategies in the semiconductor industry" University of California, Berkley 1994

    15 Bowersox, D., "Supply Chain Logistics Management" McGraw- Hill 2002

    16 Parkhe,A., "Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation" 36 (36): 794-829, 1993

    17 Roehl, T., "Stormy open marriages are better: Evidence from US, Japanese and French cooperative ventures in commercial aircraft" 22 (22): 87-95, 1987

    18 Gulati,R., "Social structure and alliance formation: A longitudinal analysis" 40 : 619-652, 1995

    19 Adler,P., "Social capital:Prospects for a new concept" 27 : 17-40, 2002

    20 Nahapiet, J., "Social capital,intellectual capital,and the organizational advantage" 23 (23): 242-266, 1998

    21 Tsai, W, "Social capital and value creation:The role of intrafirm networks" 41 : 464-476, 1998

    22 Madhok,A., "Resources, transactions and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships" 9 (9): 326-339, 1998

    23 Lane,P., "Relative absorptive capacity and inter-organizational learning" 19 : 461-477, 1998

    24 Clemons,E., "Poaching and the misappropriation of information:Transaction risks of information exchange" 21 (21): 87-107, 2004

    25 Adler,P.S., "Market,Hierarchy,and Trust:The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism" 12 (12): 215-234, 2001

    26 Argote,L., "Knowledge transfer:A basis for competitive advantage in firms" 82 : 150-169, 2000

    27 Parise, S., "Knowledge Resource Exchange in Strategic Alliances" 40 (40): 908-924, 2001

    28 Takeishi,A., "Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor:The Case of Automotive Product Development" 13 (13): 321-338, 2002

    29 Alavi,M., "Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems:Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues" 25 (25): 107-136, 2001

    30 Premkumar,G.P., "Interorganizational Systems and Supply Chain Management: An Information Processing Perspective" 17 (17): 56-69, 2000

    31 Park, S. H., "Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure" 12 (12): 37-53, 2001

    32 Clemons,E., "Information technology and industrial cooperation: The changing economics of coordination and ownership" 9 (9): 9-28, 1992

    33 Subramani, M, "How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships?" 28 (28): 45-73, 2004

    34 Kotabe, M., "Gaining from vertical partnerships: Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries" 24 (24): 293-316, 2003

    35 Bakos, J. Y., "From vendors to partners: Information Technologies and Incomplete Contract in Buyer Seller Relationships" 3 (3): 301-329, 1993

    36 Kim, K., "Electronic Information Transfer in B2B Supply Channel Relationship and the Channel Performance" 22 (22): 297-325, 2005

    37 Granovetter,M., "Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embed-dedness" 91 (91): 481-510, 1985

    38 Dyer,J.H., "Creating and managing a high performance knowledgesharing network:The Toyota case" 21 : 345-367, 2000

    39 Bensaou, M., "Configurations of interorganizational relationships:A comparison between U.S.and Japanese automakers" 41 (41): 1471-1492, 1995

    40 Colombo,M., "Complementarity and cumulative learning effects in the early diffusion of multiple technologies" 43 (43): 13-48, 1995

    41 Williamson,O., "Comparative economic organization:The analysis of discrete structural alternatives" 36 : 269-296, 1991

    42 Cook,S.D., "Bridging Epistemologies:The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing" 10 (10): 381-400, 1999

    43 Mayer, R. C., "An integration model of organizational trust" 20 : 709-734, 1995

    44 Zeng, M, "Achieving cooperation in multiparty alliances:A social dilemma approach to partnership management" 28 (28): 587-605, 2003

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼