이사회 및 감사위원회의 특성과 회계부정 간의 관계에 관한 실증분석 = An Empirical Analysis on the Relation between the Board of Director and Audit Committee's Characteristics and Financial Statement Fraud

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 논문은 이사회와 감사위원회의 특성을 이용하여 회계부정기업의 기업지배구조 특성을 연구하였다. 회계부정기업은 금융감독원의 감사보고서 감리에 지적받은 기업들이다. 우리나라는 외환위기 이후에 이사회와 감사위원회에 초점을 두고 기업지배구조를 개선시켜 왔다. 선진국에 비하면 이 제도들의 도입기간이 짧고 처음 실행되어서 여러 문제점이 있었으나 시간이 흘러감에 따라서 법규들이 정비되고 기업에서도 이들 제도가 정착되어가고 있다. 이러한 시점에서 회계부정의 발생가능성과 관련하여 이들 제도의 효과성을 알아보는 것은 학술적으로나 정책적으로 유익한 시사점을 제공할 것으로 기대된다.
실증분석결과에 따르면 첫째, 이사회 특성에 대한 결과는 이사회에서 차지하는 사외이사비율이 높을수록, 이사회에서 사외이사의 참석률이 높을수록, 적어도 1인 이상 교수가 사외이사로 선임된 경우 회계부정기업일 가능성이 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 즉 국내 선행연구(김정애 2007)에서 보고된 결과와 달리 회계부정기업은 이사회의 독립성이 낮으며, 활동적이지 못하고, 전문성이 낮다는 결과이다. 둘째, 감사위원회 특성에 대한 결과는 회색이사가 감사위원회 내 사외이사로 선임되면 회계부정기업일 가능성이 높고, 적어도 1인 이상 교수가 감사위원회 내 사외이사로 선임되면 회계부정기업일 가능성이 낮게 나타났다. 이는 감사위원회의 활동성 보다는 독립성, 전문성이 높을수록 회계부정의 발생가능성이 낮음을 의미한다.
이상의 감리지적기업을 통해 살펴본 연구결과에서는 국내의 경우도 이 분야의 외국의 선행연구(Beasley 1996; Beasley et al. 1999; 2000 등)와 같이 기업지배구조의 특성이 회계부정 발생가능성에 영향을 줄 수 있고, 우수한 기업지배구조를 가진 기업일수록 회계부정의 발생가능성이 낮다는 것을 실증적으로 보여준다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the foreign currency crisis in 1997, IBRD has required the Korean government to take measures such as reformulation of the Korean corporations' governance structure as a means to improve reliability of accounting information and transparency of their management. During the Asian financial crisis, many Korean firms were blamed for their opaque management and family-owned ownership structure. Along with the pressures from overseas, the Korean government supported by civil activist groups has exerted voluntary efforts to improve governance structure of the Korean corporations. These efforts led to the regulation in 1999 that all companies listed in the Korean Stock Exchange(KSE) are obliged to nominate outside directors in their board of directors. Also, to alleviate the severe problem in corporate governance for large Korean conglomerates(so-called Chabol), the Korean government, from 2000, mandated the establishment of audit committees for large companies listed in the stock market. In addition, it became mandatory by the Security Exchange Act in 2000 that the Korean companies, either listed in the KSE or Kosdaq, with total assets in excess of ￦2 trillion launch the audit committees comprising at least 3 directors, and at least 2/3 of the committee members should be elected from outside directors.
Concerns about earnings manipulation and recent high-profile accounting scandals have led most of the investing community to call for more effective board and audit committees as a means to improve the quality of financial statements. In response to these calls, the government has adopted regulations on the function of board and audit committees in a number of areas including the independence of their members, their accounting or financial expertise, and their activities. Thus, The role of the board and audit committee in corporate governance is a subject of increasing regulatory interest.
This study addresses the impact of certain board and audit committee characteristics on the likelihood of financial statement fraud. We examined how various characteristics of the board of directors and audit committee' governance features affect the occurrence of corporate fraud. This study focuses on board and audit committee characteristics. Such staffing decisions can directly affect the ability of the board and audit committee to monitor management's financial reporting process. We hypothesize that financial statement fraud will be negatively associated with board and audit committee independence, expertise, and activity.
This study has implications for numerous parties, such as auditors, investors, regulators, boards of directors, audit committee members, and other corporate governance reform proponents who frequently examine board and audit committee characteristics to assess its effectiveness in monitoring the firm's financial reporting processes.
We examine 60 firms which issued fraudulent reports in the period 2000-2005, together with matched pairs control groups of similar year and size.
The results of this study are summarized as follows. First, for the board characteristics, we find that when board independence(defined as the percentage of outside directors), board activity(outsider board participation), and board expertise(defined as a board containing at least one outside director with professor) increase, the likelihood of fraudulent financial statement decrease. This suggests that the independent, expertise, and activity directors on the board play a monitoring and controlling function in the context of fraud. Second, for the audit committee characteristics, we find that when audit committee's non-independence(defined as an audit committee containing at least one outside director with grey) increases, the likelihood of a fraudulent financial statement increases and also when audit committee expertise(defined as a board containing at least one outside director with professor) increases, the likelihood of a fraudulent financial statement decreases. Our findings suggest that the composition and structure of a board and audit committee are significantly correlated with the incidence of financial statement fraud.
This study makes several contributions to the accounting literature. Its adds to our knowledge of the link between the credibility of the financial reporting system and quality of governance mechanisms by extending research on the causes and consequences of financial statement fraud. This study also provides additional insight into the interaction between the board, the audit committee, and management in the financial reporting process. And the findings of this study also suggest several valuable insights into the composition and regulation of the board and audit committee for the Korean regulators.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 선행연구의 검토와 연구배경 및 가설설정
• Ⅲ. 연구설계
• Ⅳ. 실증분석 결과
• V. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최 관, "회계부정기업의 특성에 관한 연구: 감리지적기업을 중심으로" 28 (28): 211-245, 2003

2 권수영, "회계개혁법과 주주보호" (48) : 12-33, 2003

3 박종일, "이사회 구성과 기업가치" 24 (24): 91-123, 2006

4 김병호, "우리나라 기업에서 이사회의 구성이 이익 조정에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적 연구:이익의 상향과 하향 조정 유인의 경우를 중심으로" 31 (31): 1-32, 2006

5 신현한, "외부감시주체와 기업가치" 17 : 41-72, 2004

6 김문태, "외국인투자자의 소유와 사외이사의 특성이 신용평가에 미치는 영향" 32 (32): 29-58, 2007

7 전영순, "외국인투자자 및 국내 기관투자가의 투자의사결정과 회계이익의 질(Quality)" 한국경영학회 32 (32): 1001-1032, 2003

8 김문철, "분식회계기업의 적발" 16 (16): 1-34, 2007

9 박종일, "기업지배구조와 이익조정: 최대주주 지분율을 중심으로" 28 (28): 135-172, 2003

10 박종일, "기업지배구조와 이익조정: 감사위원회와 이사회특성을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 393-429, 2003

11 김정애, "기업지배구조가 회계부정에 미치는 영향" (45) : 297-324, 2007

12 박종일, "기업지배구조가 접대비 및 접대비 한도초과지출에 미치는 영향" (47) : 141-180, 2008

13 문상혁, "기업지배구조가 보고이익의 질, 경영성과 및 기업가치에 미치는 영향" (44) : 257-288, 2006

14 손성규, "감사위원회의 효과: 회계오류를 중심으로" 29 (29): 61-90, 2004

15 전규안, "감사위원회의 설치와 이익조정사이의 관계" 29 (29): 143-177, 2004

16 정영진, "감사위원회 특성이 감사보수에 미치는 영향" 41 : 145-166, 2005

17 박종일, "감사위원회 특성과 감사노력 간의 관계" (43) : 119-154, 2006

18 박종일, "감사위원회 및 이사회 특성이 재무분석가의 이익예측오차에 미치는 영향" (44) : 147-180, 2007

19 이상철, "감사위원회 도입이 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 28 (28): 143-172, 2003

20 고대영, "감사위원회 도입과 감사위원회 독립성이 이익조정 통제에 미치는 영향" (45) : 69-90, 2007

21 최 관, "감리지적기업의 이익조작에 관한 실증적 연구" 23 (23): 133-161, 1998

22 Stice,J, "Using Financial and Market Information to Identify Factors Associated with Lawsuits against Auditors" 66 : 516-533, 1991

23 Menon, K, "The Use of Audit Committee for Monitor" 13 : 121-139, 1994

24 Choi, J.H, "The Role of Audit Committees in Decreasing Earnings Management: Korea Evidence" 1 : 37-60, 2004

25 Beasley, M, "The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and Experience" 18 (18): 539-570, 2001

26 Beasley, M. S, "The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and Experience" 18 : 539-570, 2001

27 Dechow, P.M, "The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors" 77 : 35-59, 2002

28 Becker, C, "The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management" 15 : 1-24, 1998

29 Abbott, L, "The Association between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fee" 22 : 17-32, 2003

30 Kasznik,R, "On the Association Between Voluntary Disclosure and Earnings Management" 37 : 57-821, 1999

31 Mstsumoto. D.A, "Managers' Incentives to Avoid Negative Earnings Surprises" 77 (77): 483-514, 2002

32 Denis, D.K, "International Corporate Governance" 38 : 1-36, 2003

33 Yermack,D, "Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors" 40 : 185-211, 1996

34 Beasley, M. S, "Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Consideration of Industry Traits and Corporate Governance Mechanisms" 14 : 441-454, 2000

35 Beasley, M. S, "Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1987-1997 An Analysis of U.S. Public Companies" SEC Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission 1999

36 Burgstahler, D, "Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses" 24 : 99-126, 1997

37 Xie, B, "Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: the Role of the Board and the Audit Committee" 9 : 295-316, 2003

38 Krishnan, G.V, "Does the SOX Definition of an Accounting Expert Matter? The Association between Audit Committee Directors' Accounting Expertise and Accounting Conservatism" George Mason University 2007b

39 Chen, G, "Do Ownership Structure and Governance Mechanisms have an Effect on Corporate Fraud in China's Listed Firms" The Hong Kong Polytechnic University 2005

40 Krishnan, G.V, "Do Auditors Price Audit Committee's Expertise? The Case of Accounting vs. Non-Accounting Financial Experts" George Mason University 2007a

41 Agrawal, A, "Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals" 48 : 371-406, 2005

42 Agrawal,A, "Corporate Governance Consequences of Accounting Scandals: Evidence from Top Management, CFO and Auditor Turnover" University of Alabama 2007

43 Dechow, P.M, "Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC" 13 (13): 1-36, 1996

44 Vafeas,N, "Board Structure and the Informativeness of Earnings" 19 : 139-160, 2000

45 Park, Y. W, "Board Composition and Earnings Management in Canada" 10 : 431-457, 2004

46 Uzen, H, "Board Composition and Corporate Fraud" 60 : 33-43, 2004

47 Klein,A, "Audit Committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and Earnings Management" 33 : 375-400, 2002

48 Dhaliwal, D, "Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Corporate Governance and Accruals Quality: An Empirical Analysis" University of Arizona 2006

49 Carcello, J.V, "Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Competing Corporate Governance Mechanism, and Earnings Management" University of Tennessee 2006

50 Beasley,M.S, "An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud" 71 : 443-465, 1996

51 Vicknair, D, "A Note on Audit Committee Independence: Evidence from the NYSE on Grey Area Directors" 7 : 53-57, 1993