중국의 IFRS 도입에 따른 연구개발비의 가치관련성 = The Value Relevance of R&D Expenditure －Type under C－IFRS Adoption－

국문 초록 (Abstract)

2007년부터 적용된 중국의 신기업회계기준에서 무형자산과 관련한 규정이 개정됨에 따라 연구개발비에 대한 공시가 요구되었고, 그 이후 중국 상장기업의 연구개발비 관련 공시의 질은 대폭 개선되었다. 본 연구는 사회주의 경제체제를 가진 중국의 자본시장을 대상으로 연구개발비의 가치 관련성과 기업소유구조에 따른 이들 기업의 회계정보에 대한 투자자들의 반응이 차별적인지를 분석하였다.
분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 기업의 자본화된 연구개발비와 비용화된 연구개발비는 기업가치에 유의한 양(＋)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 자본화된 연구개발비의 가치관련성을 검증한 결과로, 신기업회계기준에 의해 개정된 연구개발비의 조건부 자본화 정책이 지지되는 결과이다. 둘째, R&D 지출 비중이 높은 기업의 연구개발비는 낮은 기업 보다 기업가치에 미치는 영향이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 기업소유특성에 따라 국유기업과 비국유기업 간의 가치관련성을 분석한 결과, 비국유기업의 연구개발비가 기업가치에 미치는 영향은 국유기업 보다 통계적으로 유의하게 높은 것으로 나타났다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

From 2007, China"s New Accounting Standards was published, based on the revision of related of intangible assets, the requirement of disclosure for research and development was presented. And since 2009, the quality of disclosure for R&D information for China"s listed firms has improved greatly. The purpose of this study is to investigate the expenditure of R&D activities for China"s listed firms and value relevance, and in accordance with ownership properties, whether the investors" reaction on the accounting information for those firms will be discriminative or not is also tested in this research.
Empirical results are as follows. First, In the case of total samples, when firms" R&D expenditure is higher, its R&D expenditure had greater share prices multiple as compared to other firms with lower one. Second, according to the percentage of R&D expenditure, these firms" accounting information showed discriminatory value relevance. In other words, these firms with high expenditure on R&D, their accounting informations showed higher value relevance as compared to firms with lower one. Third, according to ownership properties, these firms" accounting information had different value relevance. In other words, depending on the characteristics of ownership properties, we divided all the firms into private one and state－owned one, and private firms" accounting information"s value relevance was higher than state－owned firms.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문초록
• Abstract
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 연구배경 및 가설 설정
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 및 표본선정
• Ⅳ. 실증분석 결과
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 전신욱, "중국 국유기업의 개혁과정과 운영방향" 한국동북아학회 14 (14): 155-182, 2009

2 최종서, "연구개발비의 가치관련성에 관한 연구－그랜저 인과관계 검정을 중심으로－" 한국회계정보학회 25 (25): 253-276, 2007

3 백원선, "연구개발비와 초과이익간의 상관성이 가치평가에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 1-32, 2004

4 김동하, "독점 해체로 민영기업 육성 反부패 칼날, 기득권층을 향하다" 86 : 54-55, 2013

5 Yan, Y., "relevance of R&D spending of listed companies: On the basis of innovation－oriented accounting standards" 12 : 19-21, 2009

6 Gala, A., "Welfare Consequences of selling public enterprises: an empirical analysis" World Bank 1994

7 Darrough, M., "Valuation of loss firms in a knowledge－based economy" 12 : 61-93, 2007

8 Feltham, G. A., "Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities" 11 : 689-732, 1995

9 Han, B. H., "The value－relevance of R&D and advertising expenditures:Evidence from Korea" 39 (39): 155-173, 2004

10 Hall, B., "The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the 1980’s" 83 : 259-264, 1993

11 Chan, L., "The stock market valuation of research and development expenditure" 6 : 2431-2456, 2001

12 Grant, R. M., "The resource－based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation" 33 (33): 115-135, 1991

13 Hart, O., "The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prison" 112 (112): 1127-1161, 1997

14 Boubakri, N., "The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: evidence from developing countries" 53 : 1081-1110, 1998

15 Megginson, W., "The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firm: an international empirical analysis" 49 (49): 403-452, 1994

16 Wang, Z., "The empirical study on the relationship between R&D expenditure and stock price and on the influencing factors to R&D" Chongqing University 2004

17 Qi D., "Shareholding structure and corporate performance of partially privatized firm: Evidence from listed Chinese companies" 8 (8): 587-610, 2000

18 Wang, Z., "Research on the relationship between R & D investment, patents and Corporate Value" 2011

19 Pakes, A., "R&D, and the stock market rate of return" 93 (93): 390-409, 1985

20 Lev, B., "R&D reporting bias and their consequences" 4 : 977-1026, 2005

21 Griliches, Z., "Market value, R&D and patents" 7 : 183-187, 1981

22 Blundell, R., "Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms" 66 : 529-554, 1999

23 정진수, "KOSDAQ 등록기업의 연국개발비가 기업가치에 미치는 영향" 한국산업경제학회 17 (17): 1273-1289, 2004

24 Lev, B., "Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting" Brookings Institution Press 2001

25 Xue, Y. G., "Information disclosure and intangible value relevance study" 11 : 40-47, 2001

26 Cockburn, I., "Industry effects and appropriability measure in the stock market's valuation of R&D and patents" 78 : 419-423, 1988

27 Megginson, W., "From State to Market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization" 39 (39): 321-389, 2001

28 Barney, J., "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage" 8 : 169-182, 1991

29 Simon, D., "Enterprise restructuring in transition: A quantitative survey" 40 (40): 739-792, 2002

30 Chan, S. H., "Corporate research and development expenditures and share value" 26 : 255-276, 1990

31 Tong, Y., "Connected transaction, control benefit and earnings quality" 4 : 66-74, 2007

32 Zeng, A. M., "Comparing the new and the old accounting standards on the accounting treatment of research and development cost" 9 : 14-16, 2006

33 Levin R. C., "Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D" Economic Activity 783-820, 1987

34 Dai, J., "An empirical analysis of limit order book and order flow in china stock market" Tsinghua University 2005

35 Yang, D., "An Empirical Analysis of Status Quo and the information content of the disclosure of R&D expenses" 783-792, 2008

36 Li, Q. Y., "Amortization of R & D and advertising expenditures: Expensed or capitalized?" 10 : 3-7, 2006

37 Eberhart, A., "A reexamination of the tradeoff between the future benefit and riskiness of R&D increases" 46 : 27-52, 2008