RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      호텔산업의 합리적 수요예측 방법에 관한 연구 = 정성적 방법과 정량적 방법 간 예측치의 정확도 비교

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100117445

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Although quantitative data are available in the hotel industry, traditionally hotel managers tend to predict their room sales based on their simple judgement because of lack of knowledge on quantitative forecasting models. This practice, however, does not guarantee accuracy of their room sales in near future, making hotel yield management difficult. In this respect, this study aims to compare forecasting accuracy between quantitative and qualitative forecasting techniques when predicting hotel room sales. To this end, this study employs quantitative forecasting techniques such as Holt, Winters, and Regression models using actual data of hotel room sales. Then, these forecasts are compared with traditional qualitative forecasts by hotel managers in terms of accuracy. The results of this study indicate that forecasts by quantitative approach were more accurate than traditional qualitative forecasts by hotel managers in terms of hotel room sales. In other words, forecasts by hotel managers were found significantly different from actual room sales. The findings suggest that hotel management should utilize more accurate quantitative forecasting approach than traditional qualitative method when predicting room sales. Furthermore, the Winters Exponential Smoothing model was found to be the most appropriate forecasting method in terms of simplicity and accuracy. Thus, this study also suggest that hotel managers should utilize relatively simple forecasting method of the Winters model in particular when data of room sales depict seasonality.
      번역하기

      Although quantitative data are available in the hotel industry, traditionally hotel managers tend to predict their room sales based on their simple judgement because of lack of knowledge on quantitative forecasting models. This practice, however, does...

      Although quantitative data are available in the hotel industry, traditionally hotel managers tend to predict their room sales based on their simple judgement because of lack of knowledge on quantitative forecasting models. This practice, however, does not guarantee accuracy of their room sales in near future, making hotel yield management difficult. In this respect, this study aims to compare forecasting accuracy between quantitative and qualitative forecasting techniques when predicting hotel room sales. To this end, this study employs quantitative forecasting techniques such as Holt, Winters, and Regression models using actual data of hotel room sales. Then, these forecasts are compared with traditional qualitative forecasts by hotel managers in terms of accuracy. The results of this study indicate that forecasts by quantitative approach were more accurate than traditional qualitative forecasts by hotel managers in terms of hotel room sales. In other words, forecasts by hotel managers were found significantly different from actual room sales. The findings suggest that hotel management should utilize more accurate quantitative forecasting approach than traditional qualitative method when predicting room sales. Furthermore, the Winters Exponential Smoothing model was found to be the most appropriate forecasting method in terms of simplicity and accuracy. Thus, this study also suggest that hotel managers should utilize relatively simple forecasting method of the Winters model in particular when data of room sales depict seasonality.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼