RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      HRD 평가 장애요인 탐색: HRD 담당자의 경험을 중심으로 = The obstacles to HRD evaluation in practice: A phenomenological study on HRD practitioners’ experiences

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105592235

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to investigate the obstacles of HRD evaluation through analysis of evaluation experiences of HRD practitioners. 13 HRD practitioners 1:1 interviewed and the interview scripts were analyzed applying Van Kaam data analysis method. The contents were grouped into 24 categories, 7 sub-themes and 3 themes, obstacles to HRD evaluation. First, the lack of evaluation competencies of HRD staffs, instructors, and learners was an obstacle factor to HRD evaluation. Evaluation is low in both business priorities and competency development priorities for HRD practitioners, learners, and instructors lacks expertise as an evaluator. Second, the lack of interest and willingness of the leaders in the evaluation was an obstacle factor to HRD evaluation. Clear and consistent direction of leader based on HRD philosophy is required in order to vitalize HRD evaluation. Third, the lack of evaluation capacity, such as organizational values, resources, structure, and culture, is a barrier to HRD evaluation. HRD practitioners are facing lack of organizational consensus on what HRD is and what HRD to do, lack of resources such as time and information for evaluation, decision-making structures that are not based on evaluation results, and skepticism about evaluation. Three obstacle factors, lack of evaluation competency of the evaluator, lack of leader 's interest and willingness to evaluation, and lack of evaluation capacity of organization, are complex and intertwined. In order to overcome the obstacles to HRD evaluation, it is necessary to approach from the perspective of organizational development.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to investigate the obstacles of HRD evaluation through analysis of evaluation experiences of HRD practitioners. 13 HRD practitioners 1:1 interviewed and the interview scripts were analyzed applying Van Kaam data analysis m...

      The purpose of this study is to investigate the obstacles of HRD evaluation through analysis of evaluation experiences of HRD practitioners. 13 HRD practitioners 1:1 interviewed and the interview scripts were analyzed applying Van Kaam data analysis method. The contents were grouped into 24 categories, 7 sub-themes and 3 themes, obstacles to HRD evaluation. First, the lack of evaluation competencies of HRD staffs, instructors, and learners was an obstacle factor to HRD evaluation. Evaluation is low in both business priorities and competency development priorities for HRD practitioners, learners, and instructors lacks expertise as an evaluator. Second, the lack of interest and willingness of the leaders in the evaluation was an obstacle factor to HRD evaluation. Clear and consistent direction of leader based on HRD philosophy is required in order to vitalize HRD evaluation. Third, the lack of evaluation capacity, such as organizational values, resources, structure, and culture, is a barrier to HRD evaluation. HRD practitioners are facing lack of organizational consensus on what HRD is and what HRD to do, lack of resources such as time and information for evaluation, decision-making structures that are not based on evaluation results, and skepticism about evaluation. Three obstacle factors, lack of evaluation competency of the evaluator, lack of leader 's interest and willingness to evaluation, and lack of evaluation capacity of organization, are complex and intertwined. In order to overcome the obstacles to HRD evaluation, it is necessary to approach from the perspective of organizational development.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이혜영, "정부업무평가교육 교과과정 설계에 관한 연구 : 역량기반접근방법의 활용" 한국지방행정연구원 19 (19): 55-82, 2005

      2 송영숙, "기업의 평가역량구축 실태와 개선방안" 한국직업능력개발원 17 (17): 29-54, 2014

      3 송영숙, "기업의 조직학습과 평가를 위한 준비태세 분석" 한국인력개발학회 16 (16): 35-54, 2014

      4 박소연, "공공부문 역량평가센터(assessment center) 평가자의 역량모델 개발" 한국정책과학학회 18 (18): 203-227, 2014

      5 Russ-Eft, D., "What do the next 25 years hold for HRD research in areas of our interest?" 25 (25): 5-27, 2014

      6 Vince, R., "What do HRD scholars and practitioners need to know about power, emotion, and HRD?" 25 (25): 409-420, 2014

      7 Taylor-Ritzler, T., "Understanding and measuring evaluation capacity : A model and instrument validation study" 34 (34): 190-206, 2013

      8 Scriven, M., "Types of evaluation and types of evaluator" 17 (17): 151-161, 1996

      9 Robinson, D., "Training for impact: How to link training to business needs and measure the results" Jossey-Bass 1989

      10 King, J. A., "Toward a taxonomy of essential evaluator competencies" 22 (22): 229-247, 2001

      1 이혜영, "정부업무평가교육 교과과정 설계에 관한 연구 : 역량기반접근방법의 활용" 한국지방행정연구원 19 (19): 55-82, 2005

      2 송영숙, "기업의 평가역량구축 실태와 개선방안" 한국직업능력개발원 17 (17): 29-54, 2014

      3 송영숙, "기업의 조직학습과 평가를 위한 준비태세 분석" 한국인력개발학회 16 (16): 35-54, 2014

      4 박소연, "공공부문 역량평가센터(assessment center) 평가자의 역량모델 개발" 한국정책과학학회 18 (18): 203-227, 2014

      5 Russ-Eft, D., "What do the next 25 years hold for HRD research in areas of our interest?" 25 (25): 5-27, 2014

      6 Vince, R., "What do HRD scholars and practitioners need to know about power, emotion, and HRD?" 25 (25): 409-420, 2014

      7 Taylor-Ritzler, T., "Understanding and measuring evaluation capacity : A model and instrument validation study" 34 (34): 190-206, 2013

      8 Scriven, M., "Types of evaluation and types of evaluator" 17 (17): 151-161, 1996

      9 Robinson, D., "Training for impact: How to link training to business needs and measure the results" Jossey-Bass 1989

      10 King, J. A., "Toward a taxonomy of essential evaluator competencies" 22 (22): 229-247, 2001

      11 King, J. A., "Toward a taxonomy of essential evaluator competencies" 22 (22): 229-247, 2001

      12 Brinkerhoff, R. O., "The success case method" Berrett-Koehler 2003

      13 Preskill, H., "The cultural lens : Bringing utilization into focus" 49 : 5-15, 1991

      14 Kirkpatrick, D. L., "Techniques for evaluating training programs" 13 (13): 21-26, 1959

      15 Phillips, J., "Return on investment in training and performance programs" Gulf 1997

      16 Merriam, S. B., "Qualitative research and case study applications in education" Jossey-Bass 1998

      17 Suarez-Balcazar, Y., "Moving from science to practice in evaluation capacity building" 35 (35): 95-99, 2014

      18 van Rooij, S. W., "Measuring the business impact of employee learning : A view from the professional services sector" 26 (26): 275-297, 2015

      19 Goh, S. C., "Integrating evaluative inquiry into the organizational culture : A review and synthesis of the knowledge base" 19 (19): 99-, 2004

      20 Phillips, J., "In action: Measuring return on investment (Vol. 1)" American Society for Training and Development 1994

      21 Russ-Eft, D., "Human resource development, evaluation, and sustainability: What are the relationships?" 17 (17): 545-559, 2014

      22 Wang, G., "Human resource development measurement and evaluation : Looking back and moving forward" 7 (7): 5-15, 2005

      23 Wang, G. G., "Human resource development evaluation : Emerging market, barriers, and theory building" 7 (7): 22-36, 2005

      24 Kim, H., "How power relations structure the evaluation process for HRD programmes" 10 (10): 5-20, 2007

      25 박소연, "HRD 평가의 미래에 대한 델파이 연구" 한국인력개발학회 18 (18): 25-48, 2016

      26 박소연, "HRD 평가 국내 연구동향: 2007~2016년 학술지 게재 논문을 중심으로" 한국인력개발학회 19 (19): 1-27, 2017

      27 윤선경, "HRD 분야 이론활용 연구동향 분석: 국내 HRD 주요 학술지 논문(2007~2016년)을 중심으로" 한국인력개발학회 19 (19): 1-37, 2017

      28 Ghosh, R., "Examining the dominant, emerging, and waning themes featured in select HRD publications: Is it time to redefine HRD?" 38 (38): 302-322, 2014

      29 Russ-Eft, D., "Evaluator competencies: Standards for the practice of evaluation in organizations" Jossey-Bass 2008

      30 Swanson, R. A., "Evaluation, a state of mind" 7 (7): 16-21, 2005

      31 Kirkpatrick, D. L., "Evaluating training program: The four levels" Berrett-Koehler 1994

      32 Cousins, J. B., "Current empirical research on evaluation utilization" 56 (56): 331-364, 1986

      33 Preskill, H., "Critical issues in HRD" Perseus 199-257, 2003

      34 Preskill, H., "Building evaluation capacity: Activities for teaching and training" Sage 2015

      35 Preskill, H., "Building capacity for organizational learning through evaluative inquiry" 5 (5): 42-60, 1999

      36 Labin, S. N., "A research synthesis of the evaluation capacity building literature" 33 (33): 307-338, 2012

      37 Preskill, H., "A multidisciplinary model of evaluation capacity building" 29 (29): 443-459, 2008

      38 Holton, E. F., "A critical analysis of HRD evaluation models from a decision‐making perspective" 16 (16): 257-280, 2005

      39 Alkin, M. C., "A Guide for Evaluation Decision makers" Sage 1985

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-12-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인력개발연구 -> HRD연구
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development -> The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly
      KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.1 2.1 2.24
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.18 2.1 3.561 0.63
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼