문법 교육에서 구(句)와 어(語)의 문제 = The Problem of Phrase and Sentenc-constituent in Grammar Education

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

I researched that phrase as a concept of comparing with compound word isn't coincide with phrase as concept of corresponding to XP in phrase-structure rule. But we have used we use equally the term of phrase in two case. In phrase-structure rule, just X is able to become XP. But phrase in morphology should be consist of more than two words. At this point, the concept of phrase is differentiated each other.
This problem appears also in description of school grammar. It is very important to use the term consistently in school grammar. But at present, the term of phrase isn't used consistently in school grammar. This state can raise confusion in description of grammar.
So I suggested to use the term of phrase only as indicating to XP in phrase-structure rule in school grammar. In morphology, we don't need particularly phrase as a concept of comparing with compound word. Because it is sufficient just to distinguish compound with composition that is bigger than compound in morphology. By doing so, we cab keep the concept of phrase consistently without confusion in school grammar.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 합성어와 대비되는 개념으로서의 구(句)와 구절구조규칙 XP의 구
• Ⅲ. 학교 문법에서 구와 어의 기술의 문제, 그리고 둘의 구분
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이관규, "학교문법론" 월인 2001

2 임지룡, "학교문법과 문법교육" 박이정 2005

3 임홍빈, "학교문법, 표준문법, 규범문법의 개념과 정의" 국립국어원 10 (10): 5-26, 2000

4 남기심, "표준국어문법론" 탑출판사 1985

5 고영근, "우리말 문법론" 집문당 2008

6 정주리, "문법교과서의 내용 개발을 위한 연구- 중학교 <생활 국어> ‘음운과 음절’ 단원을 중심으로" 한국국어교육학회 (72) : 177-206, 2006

7 교육인적자원부, "문법" 서울대학교 국어교육연구소 2002

8 이익섭, "국어학개설" 학연사 2000

9 임지룡, "국어지식탐구" 박이정 1999

10 교육인적자원부, "교사용 지도서 문법" 서울대학교 국어교육연구소 2002

11 고영근, "개정판 표준국어문법론" 탑출판사 1993

12 Bloomfield,L, "Language" Henry holt and company 1933