Ancient Chinese thinkers regarded “Xing (形)” as important, as they believed that it implied that the body was a bowl to hold life. On the other hand, “Shen (神)” was considered a part that could be seen or felt substantially by a human bein...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107099952
박종학 (우송정보대학)
2020
Korean
道家 ; 管子 ; 老子 ; 莊子 ; 淮南子 ; 形 ; 神 ; 忘我 ; 物我一體 ; Dao jia(道家) ; Guan zi(管子) ; Lao zi(老子) ; Zhuang zi(莊子) ; Huai nanzi(淮南子) ; 形(Xing) ; Shen(神) ; Wang wo(忘我) ; Wu wo yi ti(物我一體)
KCI등재
학술저널
15-35(21쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Ancient Chinese thinkers regarded “Xing (形)” as important, as they believed that it implied that the body was a bowl to hold life. On the other hand, “Shen (神)” was considered a part that could be seen or felt substantially by a human bein...
Ancient Chinese thinkers regarded “Xing (形)” as important, as they believed that it implied that the body was a bowl to hold life. On the other hand, “Shen (神)” was considered a part that could be seen or felt substantially by a human being. Thefollowingaretheresultsofexaminingthis from the perspective of Dao jia (道家) and Huai nan zi (淮南子). Guan zi (管子) s how s that “Xing(形)” developed from the viewpoint of Dao jia (道家). It was thought that clothing and food were absolute needs and that the essence of Qi (精氣) was necessary for sustaining human l ife. Lao zi (老子) thought that all things, including human beings, originated in “Dao (道)”; that is, both “Xing (形)” and “Shen (神)” immanent in a human being were considered as having derived from “Dao (道).” Zhuang zi (莊子) regarded all things as having been created by combining Yin qi (陰氣) and Yang qi (陽氣). Accordingly, it was considered that “形(body)” was a bowl to uphold life and that “Shen (神)” was in charge of mental thinking and decision making. This was thought to be capable of reaching the state of “Dao (道)” through his unique training method of “Wang wo(忘我)” and “Wu wo yi ti (物我一體).” It was mentioned that these two can reach the top of “Wang wo(忘我)” and “Wu wo yi ti (物我一體),” as claimed by Zhuang zi (莊 子), when “Xing (形)” and “Shen (神)” need to work smoothly inside the human body. Meanwhile, Huai nan zi (淮南子) asserted that “Xing(形)” and “Shen (神)” and “Qi (氣)” were more elaborate, starting from Dao jia (道家)’s theory of Yang sheng (養生). From his standpoint, he deemed “Xing (形)” as a house in which l ife settles, “Shen(神)” as presiding over a body, and “Qi (氣)” as satisfying the energy of life. In addition, “Shen (神)” was regarded as being able to acquire wisdom available for distinguishing and understanding the w orld a nd t he u niverse b eyond time a nd space g iven t hrough a dvanced training. This approach to the essential concept of “Xing (形)” and “Shen (神)” by Dao jia (道家) and Huai nan zi (淮南子) a llowed a d iscussion t hat expands the realm of philosophical inspiration and thought.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 추만호, "老子講義" 우리문화연구소 1996
2 李申, "老子與道家" 商務印書館 1996
3 諸子集成 第四冊老子, "老子本義, 莊子集解" 河北人民出版社 1986
4 김용옥, "老子哲學이것이다" 통나무 2000
5 이상은, "한한대사전" 민중서림 1321-, 1992
6 오강남, "도덕경" 현암사 2002
7 諸子, "第一冊論語正義" 河北人民出版社 1986
8 何寧, "淮南子集釋 上 卷一, 俶眞訓" 中華書局 1998
10 葉慶炳, "明代文學批評資料彙編 上․下" 成文出版社 1975
1 추만호, "老子講義" 우리문화연구소 1996
2 李申, "老子與道家" 商務印書館 1996
3 諸子集成 第四冊老子, "老子本義, 莊子集解" 河北人民出版社 1986
4 김용옥, "老子哲學이것이다" 통나무 2000
5 이상은, "한한대사전" 민중서림 1321-, 1992
6 오강남, "도덕경" 현암사 2002
7 諸子, "第一冊論語正義" 河北人民出版社 1986
8 何寧, "淮南子集釋 上 卷一, 俶眞訓" 中華書局 1998
10 葉慶炳, "明代文學批評資料彙編 上․下" 成文出版社 1975
11 盧台俊譯解, "新譯道德經" 홍신문화사 1998
12 陆钦, "庄子通义" 吉林出版社 1994
13 崔仁愛, "個性的 文藝觀 硏究" 嶺南大 1995
14 李狀鷹, "中華古文論選注" 高等學校文科敎材 1991
15 敏澤, "中國美學思想史" 齊魯書社 1987
16 李澤厚, "中國美學史" 中國社會科學出版社 1984
17 張少康, "中國歷代文論精品" 時代文藝出版社 1995
18 郭紹虞, "中國歷代文學論著精選" 華正書局 1980
19 張少康, "中國文學理論批評發展史 上․下" 北京大學出版社 1995
20 劉大杰, "中國文學發展史" 華正書局 1982
21 郭紹虞, "中國文學批評史" 明倫書局
22 葉慶炳, "中國文學史 上․下" 學生書局 1982
23 童慶炳, "中國古代詩學心理透視" 白花文藝出版社 1993
24 陈良运, "中国诗学体系论" 中国社会科学出版社 1992
일본군 ‘위안부’ 문제의 연극적 재현과 ‘포스트–기억 세대’의 시선-김민정 희곡 <하나코>를 중심으로
포스트휴머니즘으로서의 바이오아트-<대전비엔날레 2018: 바이오>의 작품 분석을 중심으로
윤종신의 발라드 작곡 기법에 관한 고찰-2017년 <월간 윤종신> 앨범을 중심으로
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2022-03-24 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 문화와 융합 -> 문화와융합 | ![]() |
| 2022-03-16 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : The Korean Society of Culture and Convergence -> The Society of Korean Culture and Convergence | ![]() |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
| 2014-03-04 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 문학과언어학회 -> 한국문화융합학회영문명 : Munhak Kwa Eoneo Hakhoi -> The Korean Society of Culture and Convergence |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.13 |