미국과 중국의 “인도-태평양 전략”과 패권 경쟁 = The US’s-China’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and Their Hegemonic Competition over This Region

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The main purpose of this article is to explore the US and China’s “Indo-Pacific Strategy” and their countermeasure toward each other. In order to deter China’s overwhelming influence in the Indo-Pacific region, the US has been driving some foreign policies. First, policy transition from Rebalancing strategy toward Asian-pacific under the Obama administration to Indo-Pacific strategy. Second, maintaining and expanding US’s influence in Southeast Asia as the most conflictive region between US and China. Third, Tit-for-Tat strategy against China’s One-Belt/One-Road Initiative (BRI) under Xi’s regime. Fourth, launching trade war between US and China under Trump administration for mitigating US’s trade deficit with China. China also has been interested in the US Indo-Pacific strategy with fear. China’s basic perception of US Indo-Pacific strategy is as follows. First, There is no big difference between Rebalancing strategy toward Asia-Pacific under Obama’s regime and Indo-Pacific Strategy under Trump’s regime. Second, China regards Indo-Pacific strategy as containing China. China also independently has put forward to drive a assertive grand strategy called China’s Dream especially under Xi’s regime since globally rising China as G2. We can call this grand strategy Indo-Pacific strategy with China style. There are some China’s countermeasures to US Indo-Pacific strategy as follows. BRI, strategic security cooperation between China and Russia, expanding and consolidating Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Strategy of splitting Quad, engaging Southeast Asia, Taiwan, and Korean Peninsula as the most conflictive region between China and US. To avoid strategic dilemma within conflict between China and US, Moon administration has been vigorously pushing forward hedging policy toward US and China by building peace and co-prosperity through denuclearization of North Korea, New Northern & Southern Policy.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "중러, 베이징서 MD 방어합동 훈련 개시…사드·북한"

2 이지용, "중국의 국가정체성 진화와 동아시아 해양안보환경 변화" 일민국제관계연구원 19 (19): 77-114, 2014

3 KIEP 북경사무소, "중국의 ‘일대일로’ 추진현황 및 평가와 전망" 대외경제정책연구원 2017

4 김지석, "일대일로라는 멀고 험한 길"

5 조찬수, "양극화, 대침체, 그리고 미국우선주의 무역정치 : 트럼프 행정부 무역정책의 국내정치적 설명" 사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소 33 (33): 5-32, 2018

6 헨리 키신저, "세계질서" 민음사 2016

7 이대우, "미국의 인도-태평양 전략" 세종연구소

8 김재관, "미국의 ‘신실크로드 전략’과 중러의 대응" 평화와 민주주의연구소 23 (23): 163-206, 2015

9 백준기, "러시아․중국․인도 삼각협력체제의 전략적 함의와 시사점" 대외경제정책연구원출판부 2012

10 이혜정, "냉전 이후 미국 패권: 자본주의와 민주주의, 전쟁의 변주" 한울아카데미 2017

11 김재관, "남중국해 판결의 국제정치적 함의와 전망: 남중국해 판결 관련 핵심 쟁점을 중심으로" 한국국제정치학회 56 (56): 299-346, 2016

12 원동욱, "국제운송회랑의 새로운 지정학 : 유라시아 실크로드 구축을 위한 협력방안연구" 대외경제정책연구원 2015

13 "美인도태평양 전략'과 '中일대일로'…경쟁이나 협력이냐"

14 袁征, "美日同盟与中日关系" (3) : 2018

15 韦宗友, "特郎普政府国家安全战略与中美关系的未来" (1) : 2018

16 陈积敏, "特郎普政府‘印太’战略: 政策与限度" (1) : 2018

17 扬白江, "日本参与'一带一路'合作: 转变动因与前景分析" (3) : 2018

18 张茗, "奥巴马政府亚太军事再平衡剖析" (4) : 2013

19 夏立平, "地缘政治与地缘经济双重视角下的美国印太战略" (2) : 2015

20 时殷弘, "全球政治形势和国际格局透视" (4) : 2013

21 中華人民共和國國務院新聞辦公室, "中國武裝力量的多樣化運用"

22 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室, "中国的北极政策 白皮书（全文)"

23 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室, "中国的军事战略"

24 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室, "中国的亚太安全合作政策 白皮书（全文)"

25 "中·러시아군, 베이징서 미사일요격 합동훈련…北견제 목적도"

26 남민우, "中·日, 제3국 인프라 공동개발 등 대규모 경제협력 합의"

27 왕이, "中 패권추구 안 해. 美역할 대신하거나 도전하지 않을 것"

28 박선미, "中 일대일로 숨은 발톱에 참여국 비명"

29 김기성, "中 일대일로 또 파열음..시에라리온, 신공항 사업 취소"

30 "中 외교부 대변인, 말콤 턴불 호주 총리의 대중국 정책 연설 발표 관련 기자회견"

31 严安林, "一带一路 倡议对亚太秩序与两岸关系的影响" (4) : 2017

32 강남규, "‘민간 CIA’의 예측 … “한국이 미·중 패권경쟁 최대 피해국”"

33 吴兆礼, "‘印太’战略的发展、局限及中国应对" 39 (39): 2018

34 Blackwill, Robert, "War by other means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft" Harvard University Press 2016

35 Pence, Mike, "Vice President Mike Pence's Remarks on the Administration's Policy Towards China October 4 Event"

36 Hayton, Bill, "The South China Sea: the Struggle for Power in Asia" Yale University Press 2014

37 Posen, Barry R, "The Rise of Illiberal Hegemony: Trump’s Surprising Grand Strategy" 2018

38 Ikenberry, G. John, "The Plot Against American Foreign Policy: Can the Liberal Order Survive?" 2017

39 Campbell, Kurt M, "The Pivot: The Future of American Statecraft in Asia" Hachette Book Group 2016

40 Runde, Daniel F, "The BUILD Act Has Passed: What’s Next?"

41 DoD, "Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of USA"

42 Khurana, Gurpreet S, "Security of Sea Lines: Prospects for India-Japan Cooperation" 31 (31): 2007

43 Morris, Terry S, "Securing Operational Access: Evolving the Air-Sea Battle Concept"

44 Blackwill, Robert D, "Revising U.S. Grand Strategy Toward China" 2015

45 Holmes, James, "Redefining Air Sea Battle: JAM-GC, China and the Quest for Clarity"

46 International Cooperation Bureau, "Priority Policy for Development Cooperation FY 2017)"

47 McLeary, Paul, "New US Concept Melds Air, Sea and Land"

48 The White House, "National Security Strategy(NSS)" 2017

49 Malik, Mohan, "Maritime Security in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from China, India, and the United States" Rowman & Littlefield 2014

50 Medcalf, Rory, "Maritime Security in the Indo-Pacific: Perspectives from China, India, and the United States" Rowman & Littlefield 2014

51 Hurley, John Scott Morris, "Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective" Center for Global Development(CGD) 2018

52 Department of Defense, Australian Government, "Defending Australia and Its National Interests"

53 O'Rourke, Ronald, "China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress"

54 Kazianis, Harry J, "Air-Sea Battle’s Next Step: JAM-GC on Deck"