햄스터 볼주머니를 이용한 구강점막 자극평가 조건설정 = Condition Setting for Oral Mucosal Irritation Evaluation using Hamster Cheek Pouch

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the optimum conditions for oral mucosal irritation testing using the buccal pouch of hamsters. Methods: Test materials were applied to the buccal pouch of seven-week old male Syrian hamsters (SLC, Japan) four times at one-hour intervals and macroscopic changes were examined at 24 hours after final treatment. After sacrifice, the buccal pouches were removed and prepared for histopathological evaluation. In order to set the exposure time, we performed exposure tests of 5, 12, 18 and 23 minutes using sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) 1% and set the treatment volume from the test results at 2, 3, or 4 ml treatment using SLS 1%, Triton X-100 1% and ethanol. After setting the experimental conditions, seven groups of materials [sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) (1%), Triton X-100 (1%), hydrogen peroxide (3%), ethanol (100%), chlorhexidine (0.2%, 2%), phosphate buffer saline (PBS)] were assessed. Results: Experimental conditions of material exposure time were fixed as 18 minutes from the exposure tests of 5, 12, 18 or 23 min using sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) 1%. Treated volume was set as 4 ml per each pouch from the test results of 2, 3, or 4 ml treatments using SLS 1%, Triton X-100 1% and ethanol. The results in terms of irritation degree were in the order of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) (1%) > Triton X-100 (1%) ${\fallingdotseq}$ hydrogen peroxide (3%) > ethanol (100%) ${\fallingdotseq}$ chlorhexidine (0.2%, 2%) > phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Conclusion: From this study, suitable conditions for hamster mucosal irritation testing were suggested and this method was verified through materials commonly used on oral mucosal membranes.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정성희, "구강점막에서 약물의 직접적용을 위한 연구" 대한안면통증∙구강내과학회 35 (35): 229-235, 2010

2 Rantanen I, "The effects of two sodium lauryl sulphatecontaining toothpastes with and without betaine on human oral mucosa in vivo" 27 (27): 31-34, 2003

3 Baert JH, "The effect of sodium lauryl sulphate and triclosan on hamster cheek pouch musosa" 77 (77): 73-78, 1996

4 Ahlfors EE, "The development of T cell-dominated inflammatory responses induced by sodium lauryl sulphate in mouse oral mucosa" 57 (57): 796-804, 2012

5 Namiki N, "Studies on development of dosage forms for pediatric use(V)oral mucosal irritation study of gummi drugs in hamster cheek pouch" 21 (21): 87-89, 1998

6 Bourrinet P, "Interlaboratory study for the assessment of potential irritative properties of hygiene products on the hamster cheek pouch" 45 (45): 36-40, 1995

7 "ISO 10993-10:2010 Biological evaluation of medical devices°™Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization"

8 Veys RJ, "Histological changes in the hamster cheek pouch epithelium induced by topical application of sodium lauryl sulphate" 75 (75): 203-209, 1994

9 Kim BH, "Evaluation of irritation potential of newly-developed toothpaste in the hamster oral mucous membrane" 17 (17): 167-171, 2001

10 Ahlfors E, "Contact sensitivity in the murine oral mucosa. I. An experimental model of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions at mucosal surfaces" 86 (86): 449-456, 1991

11 Utoguchi N, "Carrier-mediated absorption of salicylic acid from hamster cheek pouch mucosa" 88 (88): 142-146, 1999

12 Piliero SJ, "Biocompatibility evaluation of casting alloys in hamsters" 41 (41): 220-223, 1979