농지 양도소득세 감면제도에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Many disputes arise between taxpayers and the tax offices regarding the exemptions from capital gains taxes for the agricultural land cultivated for more than 8 years, and for the agricultural land substitution. Most of the disputes arise from the tax offices’ denial for the tax-exemption requests by the taxpayers. Some disputes may result from the false requests by the taxpayers or deficit of the documents, others may result from the unclearness of the provisions and the lack of systems to verify whether the taxpayers farmed the land personally.
This study analyzed the problems of the tax-exemption system for the agricultural land cultivated for more than 8 years and for the agricultural land substitution, and suggested some improvements as follow.
First, the concept of cultivation is ambiguous and in need of clarification. Especially ‘permanent farmer’, ‘farm work’ and ‘the labor of tax payer’ should be defined clearly.
Second, the tax -exemption for the agricultural land substitution shouldn’t be applied to the land not cultivated for more than 5 years, and the agricultural land newly acquired should be cultivated for more than 5 years. And the maximum amount of tax-exemption also should be raised from 100 million won for one year and for 5 years to 200 million won for one year and 300 million won for 5 years.
Third, the regulation that the tax-exemption applies to the taxpayers who live in Si, Gun, Gu or the connecting Si, Gun, Gu should be abolished. And the limitation of the distance in straight line might be lengthened more than 20 kilometers.
Fourth, the tax -exemption should be endowed to the land used for livestock raising.
Fifth, it is provided that the tax-exemption for the agricultural land substitution is applied only to the substitution by the agricultural need. But the taxpayer cannot get the tax -exemption if he does not farm the land personally for a certain period. So the agricultural need provision might be deleted in order not to cause a confusion.
Sixth, the area requirement and the price requirement for the new land acquired by substitution should be raised.
Seventh, it’s not easy to verify the taxpayers’ cultivation with the documents provided in the regulations. So, the regulations should be amended towards collecting as many as documents supporting taxpayer’s cultivation. And it should be compulsory for tax officer to study taxpayer’s cultivation on the spot.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 통계청, "재배규모별 논벼 주요투입물량 및 시간"

2 유재선, "자본이득세제에 관한 연구－비사업자의 부동산 양도소득 과세에 대한 입법론을 중심 으로－" 강남대학교 2009

3 김두형, "자경농지 대토에 따른 양도소득세 감면요건의 문제점과 개선방안" 7 : 220-239, 2007

4 최남수, "양도소득세제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구－비도시지역의 토지를 중심으로－" 중앙대학교 2007

5 김정욱, "양도소득세에 있어서 농지에 관한 특례규정"

6 안수남, "양도소득세2010" 광교이택스 2010

7 국세공무원교육원, "양도소득세 실무해설Ⅱ"

8 김보남, "농지에 대한 조세제도의 문제점 및 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국조세연구포럼 10 (10): 216-257, 2010

9 성화용, "농지에 대한 양도소득세의 비과세․감면에 관한 연구" 강원대학교 2007

10 박훈, "농지에 대한 양도소득세 과세특례에 관한 연구" 한국조세연구포럼 9 (9): 97-125, 2009

11 최성탁, "농업경쟁력 제고를 위한 조세제도" 계명대학교 2009

12 "국세청 홈페이지 국세법령정보시스템"

13 국세청, "2010국세통계연보"