RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소비자의 심리적 일탈, 라이선싱 효과 = Licensing Effect, the Consumers` Psychological Deviance

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A95831562

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Most of researches about consumer choice focus on the decision processes by which consumers choose among a set of alternatives, independent of the way they arrive at the choice. In contrast to this focus on isolated, or single shot choices, consumers in the real world often make a series of decisions in which one choice follows another. Preferences among alternatives can be affected by consumers` prior actions. Prior decisions and actions can serve as a license to choose options that are inconsistent with the salient self. Licensing can operate by committing to an affirmative action, which reduces the feeling of guilty associated with the purchase of relative luxuries. Studies demonstrate the proposed licensing effect of a prior commitment to an affirmative action on subsequent choice. The purpose of this study is to examine the customer response in the licensing situation. To verify how customers decide to buy hedonic products a 2(Type of goal: health, learning) X 2(level of effort: high, low) X 2(level of self-control: high, low)factorial design experiment was conducted with undergraduate students at university at Korea as part of their course requirement. Several factors including self-concept, self-control and purchase intention were selected from prior studies and manipulations for each scenario were checked. Due to multiple dependent variables(self-concept, purchase intention), we used a MANCOVA to test four hypotheses developed. The results show that type of goal has no effect on self-concept(learning: mean=4.75 / health: mean=4.74, p=.643) and purchase intention(learning: mean=4.60 / health: mean=4.50, p=.321). According to this result, we assumed that licensing effect could occur in various situations. The main effect of level of effort was significant for two dependent variables (self-concept: F=31.477, p<0.01 / purchase intention: F=40.130, p<0.01) in support of H1 and H2. Interaction effects between level of effort and self-control for H3 and H4 on two dependent variables were significant(self-concept: F=17.533, p<0.01 / purchase intention: F=13.472, p<0.01). The research results show that consumers who study hard or work hard are more preferring to buy hedonic goods than people do not do like that in various situations. Individuals who pay more effort to achieve their goals are more likely to buy hedonic goods. Ironically, people who think they have high level of self-control are more likely to make indulgent choice when they pay a lot of effort for their objectives. Furthermore, there are interaction effects between level of effort and self-control. Study on licensing effect in consumer choice is helpful for understanding consumers` irrational behaviors. For marketers, take advantage of human irrationality is one of the means of sales promotion. Although this way maybe inconsistent with the ethical management, from the perspective of consumers, understanding licensing effect could be helpful because it make them to try to avoid bad choices. The fact that data were obtained from only a specific segment of the population by experiment is one of limitation in this research. Also, selection of the goal or product type for the research did not allow alternative options that differed significantly in terms of licensing effect. Therefore, expanded research targeted consumers who really in licensing condition with various situations need to be conducted for accuracy and generalization. Additionally, for deeper understanding of licensing effect of consumers, qualitative research approach is needed.
    번역하기

    Most of researches about consumer choice focus on the decision processes by which consumers choose among a set of alternatives, independent of the way they arrive at the choice. In contrast to this focus on isolated, or single shot choices, consumers ...

    Most of researches about consumer choice focus on the decision processes by which consumers choose among a set of alternatives, independent of the way they arrive at the choice. In contrast to this focus on isolated, or single shot choices, consumers in the real world often make a series of decisions in which one choice follows another. Preferences among alternatives can be affected by consumers` prior actions. Prior decisions and actions can serve as a license to choose options that are inconsistent with the salient self. Licensing can operate by committing to an affirmative action, which reduces the feeling of guilty associated with the purchase of relative luxuries. Studies demonstrate the proposed licensing effect of a prior commitment to an affirmative action on subsequent choice. The purpose of this study is to examine the customer response in the licensing situation. To verify how customers decide to buy hedonic products a 2(Type of goal: health, learning) X 2(level of effort: high, low) X 2(level of self-control: high, low)factorial design experiment was conducted with undergraduate students at university at Korea as part of their course requirement. Several factors including self-concept, self-control and purchase intention were selected from prior studies and manipulations for each scenario were checked. Due to multiple dependent variables(self-concept, purchase intention), we used a MANCOVA to test four hypotheses developed. The results show that type of goal has no effect on self-concept(learning: mean=4.75 / health: mean=4.74, p=.643) and purchase intention(learning: mean=4.60 / health: mean=4.50, p=.321). According to this result, we assumed that licensing effect could occur in various situations. The main effect of level of effort was significant for two dependent variables (self-concept: F=31.477, p<0.01 / purchase intention: F=40.130, p<0.01) in support of H1 and H2. Interaction effects between level of effort and self-control for H3 and H4 on two dependent variables were significant(self-concept: F=17.533, p<0.01 / purchase intention: F=13.472, p<0.01). The research results show that consumers who study hard or work hard are more preferring to buy hedonic goods than people do not do like that in various situations. Individuals who pay more effort to achieve their goals are more likely to buy hedonic goods. Ironically, people who think they have high level of self-control are more likely to make indulgent choice when they pay a lot of effort for their objectives. Furthermore, there are interaction effects between level of effort and self-control. Study on licensing effect in consumer choice is helpful for understanding consumers` irrational behaviors. For marketers, take advantage of human irrationality is one of the means of sales promotion. Although this way maybe inconsistent with the ethical management, from the perspective of consumers, understanding licensing effect could be helpful because it make them to try to avoid bad choices. The fact that data were obtained from only a specific segment of the population by experiment is one of limitation in this research. Also, selection of the goal or product type for the research did not allow alternative options that differed significantly in terms of licensing effect. Therefore, expanded research targeted consumers who really in licensing condition with various situations need to be conducted for accuracy and generalization. Additionally, for deeper understanding of licensing effect of consumers, qualitative research approach is needed.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김기옥, "현대 소비자의 소비생활복지: 자기결정성이론의 적용" 한국소비자학회 18 (18): 47-65, 2007

    2 심춘섭, "합리적인 소비생활에 관한 연구: 전라남도지방의 농촌주부를 대상으로" (6) : 1969

    3 김정숙, "한· 일 여자대학생들의 보상소비성향" 대한가정학회 40 (40): 31-48, 2002

    4 권미화, "청소년 소비자의 소비행동이 합리성에 영향을 미치는 요인" 18 (18): 175-190, 2000

    5 김남국, "일탈허가권과 마케팅" 47 (47): 67-, 2009

    6 홍준희, "스포츠 상황에서 자기조절 초점과 목표추구 행동간의 관계" 서울대학교 2001

    7 문지현, "소주, 소통과 일탈의 즐거움" 중앙대학교 2010

    8 김난도, "소비합리성의 개념에 대한 연구" 한국소비자학회 14 (14): 5-106, 2003

    9 송인숙, "도시 여성소비자의 보상구매행동" 13 (13): 5-25, 1993

    10 양세정, "남녀 대학생의 보상소비성향에 관한 연구" 한국가정관리학회 26 (26): 1-14, 2008

    1 김기옥, "현대 소비자의 소비생활복지: 자기결정성이론의 적용" 한국소비자학회 18 (18): 47-65, 2007

    2 심춘섭, "합리적인 소비생활에 관한 연구: 전라남도지방의 농촌주부를 대상으로" (6) : 1969

    3 김정숙, "한· 일 여자대학생들의 보상소비성향" 대한가정학회 40 (40): 31-48, 2002

    4 권미화, "청소년 소비자의 소비행동이 합리성에 영향을 미치는 요인" 18 (18): 175-190, 2000

    5 김남국, "일탈허가권과 마케팅" 47 (47): 67-, 2009

    6 홍준희, "스포츠 상황에서 자기조절 초점과 목표추구 행동간의 관계" 서울대학교 2001

    7 문지현, "소주, 소통과 일탈의 즐거움" 중앙대학교 2010

    8 김난도, "소비합리성의 개념에 대한 연구" 한국소비자학회 14 (14): 5-106, 2003

    9 송인숙, "도시 여성소비자의 보상구매행동" 13 (13): 5-25, 1993

    10 양세정, "남녀 대학생의 보상소비성향에 관한 연구" 한국가정관리학회 26 (26): 1-14, 2008

    11 이경진, "기혼여성의 보상구매행동에 대한 연구" 서울대학교 2006

    12 이진, "개인의 목표 성취와 삶의 만족도: 자기 효능감의 역할을 중심으로" 연세대학교 2007

    13 Baumeister, Roy F., "Yielding to Temptation: Self-Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior" 28 (28): 670-676, 2002

    14 Wilcox. Keith, "Vicarious Goal Fulfillment: When the Mere Presence of a Healthy Option Leads to an Ironically Indulgent Decision" 9 : 380-393, 2009

    15 Rodgers, Shelly, "The effect of Sponsor Relevance on Consumer Reactions to Internet Sponsorships" 32 (32): 67-76, 2004

    16 Ajzen, Icek, "The Theory of Planned Behavior" 50 : 179-211, 1991

    17 Pervin, Lawrence A., "The Science of Personality" John Wiley and Sons 1996

    18 Thompson, Craig J., "The Lived Meaning of Free Choice: An Existential-Phenomenologial Description of Everyday Consumer Experiences of Contemporary Married Women" 17 (17): 346-361, 1990

    19 Holbrook. Morris B., "The Experiential Aspect of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun" 9 (9): 132-140, 1982

    20 Locke, Edwin A., "The Determinants of Goal Commitment" 13 : 23-29, 1988

    21 Rook, Dennis W., "The Buying Impulse" 14 (14): 189-199, 1987

    22 Logue, A. W, "Self-control: Waiting until tomorrow for what you want today" Prentice Hall 1995

    23 Kanfer, Frederick. H, "Self-control and tolerance of noxious stimulation" 18 (18): 79-85, 1966

    24 Noveemsky, Nathan, "Reference Fluency in Consumer Choice" 44 : 347-356, 2007

    25 Chakravarti, Dipankar, "Product Category Perceptions, Elaborative Processing and Brand Name Extension Strategies" 17 (17): 910-916, 1990

    26 James, William, "Principles of Psychology" University of Chicago Press 1890

    27 Brim, Oliver. G., "Personality and Decision Processes: Studies in the Social Psychology of Thinking" Stanford University Press 1962

    28 Patterson, Gerald R., "Performance Models for Antisocial Boys" 41 (41): 432-444, 1973

    29 Ferster, G, "Patterns of antenatal care, perinatal mortality, and birth-weight in three consultant obstetric units" 308 (308): 727-729, 1976

    30 Alexis, Marcus, "Organization Decision Making" Prentice-Hall, Inc 1967

    31 Bazerman, Max H., "Negotiation With Yourself and Losing: Understanding and Managing Conflicting Internal Preferences" 23 : 225-241, 1998

    32 Khan, Uzma, "Navigating Between Virtues and Vices: Moderators of Decisions Involving Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Choices" 358-361, 2004

    33 Dhar, Ravi, "Marketing Complementary Choices in Consumption Episodes: Highlighting Versus Balancing" 36 : 29-44, 1999

    34 Khan, Uzma, "Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice" 259-266, 2006

    35 Tangney, June P, "High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success" 72 (72): 271-324, 2004

    36 Vohs, Kathleen D., "Handbook of Self Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications" Guilford 2004

    37 Fishbach, Ayelet, "Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice" 32 (32): 370-377, 2005

    38 Noveemsky, Nathan, "Goal Fulfillment and Goal Targets in Sequential Choice" 32 : 396-404, 2005

    39 Pervin, Lawrence A., "Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology" Erlbaum 1989

    40 Kivetz, Ran, "Earning the Right to Indulge: Efforts as Determinant of Consumer Preferences Toward Frequency Program Rewards" 39 : 155-170, 2002

    41 Heatherton, Todd F., "Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring State Self-Esteem" 60 : 895-910, 1991

    42 Kanfer, Ruth, "Depress, Interpersonal Standard Setting, and Judgments of Self-Efficacy" 92 : 319-329, 1983

    43 Dhar, Ravi, "Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods" 37 (37): 60-71, 2000

    44 Ames, Carole, "Classroom: Goal, Structures, and Student Motivation" 84 : 261-271, 1992

    45 Weiner, Bernard, "An Attribution Theory of Motivation and Emotion, In Springer Series in Social Psychology" Prentice-Hall 1986

    46 Dweck, Carol S., "A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality" 95 : 256-273, 1988

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼