RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      참여정부 가족정책의 기본 구성요소의 분석과 발전방향 모색

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40106197

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This research aims to suggest the direction of family policy that the current Korean government pursues as an attempt to respond to the changes in family system. In order to recommend the desirable direction of future family policy, this study examines the viewpoint of family, the object of family policy, the typology of family policy we need to pursue. It also evaluates the current system of Korean family policy by comparing with those in other countries, with reference to the delivery system. The finding suggests that the current family policy in Korea is characterized by such principles as `family protection first and state involvement later`, `selective provision of services`, and `passive involvement of the state in family welfare`. The policy suggestions this study would like to make are as follows; First, a consensus needs to be made regarding the goal(s) and boundary of family policy to set up its basic direction. This consists of the establishment of family friendly personal services, the implementation of system and services to carry out active family policy, the introduction of the policies which help achieve sexual equality and social responsibility for supporting the elderly, and the enactment of `basic law of family support` or the installation of `family policy committee` under president or prime minister. Second, `ministry of family welfare` needs to be set up as a principal institution that conducts a professional role in coordinating basic policies and delivering systemic services. It might be possible to give more priority to family policy so that the general direction of social policy is closely connected with family policy. Finally, for delivery system, it is required to establish `family support center` in local communities by which effective service provision can be made. There should be at least one center in the administrative units of city (Si), county (Gun), and council (Gu). It is also required each center develop a network system with the existing institutions such as community welfare or civil autonomy center which have been delivering family welfare services.
      번역하기

      This research aims to suggest the direction of family policy that the current Korean government pursues as an attempt to respond to the changes in family system. In order to recommend the desirable direction of future family policy, this study examine...

      This research aims to suggest the direction of family policy that the current Korean government pursues as an attempt to respond to the changes in family system. In order to recommend the desirable direction of future family policy, this study examines the viewpoint of family, the object of family policy, the typology of family policy we need to pursue. It also evaluates the current system of Korean family policy by comparing with those in other countries, with reference to the delivery system. The finding suggests that the current family policy in Korea is characterized by such principles as `family protection first and state involvement later`, `selective provision of services`, and `passive involvement of the state in family welfare`. The policy suggestions this study would like to make are as follows; First, a consensus needs to be made regarding the goal(s) and boundary of family policy to set up its basic direction. This consists of the establishment of family friendly personal services, the implementation of system and services to carry out active family policy, the introduction of the policies which help achieve sexual equality and social responsibility for supporting the elderly, and the enactment of `basic law of family support` or the installation of `family policy committee` under president or prime minister. Second, `ministry of family welfare` needs to be set up as a principal institution that conducts a professional role in coordinating basic policies and delivering systemic services. It might be possible to give more priority to family policy so that the general direction of social policy is closely connected with family policy. Finally, for delivery system, it is required to establish `family support center` in local communities by which effective service provision can be made. There should be at least one center in the administrative units of city (Si), county (Gun), and council (Gu). It is also required each center develop a network system with the existing institutions such as community welfare or civil autonomy center which have been delivering family welfare services.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-12-02 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY SOCIAL WORK KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.44 1.44 1.83
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.97 2.02 2.307 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼