왕세정(王世貞)을 바라보는 두 대가(大家)의 시각 -김창협(金昌協)과 전겸익(錢謙益)의 왕세정(王世貞) 이해- = The viewpoint of two masters who understand Wang Shizhen

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article is to research viewpoint of Kim Changhyup 金昌協 and Qian Qianyi 錢謙益 about Wang Shizhen 王世貞. Both of them established a new literary views against Wang Shizhen group in Chosun and Ming dynasty in the 17th. Nevertheless, two author`s understanding about Wang Shizhen is not resemble but considerably different. Kim Changhyup underestimated Wang Shizhen as a pseudo writer in equating Wang Shizhen with his colleagues. On the other hand, Qian Qianyi harshly criticized Wang Shizhen in the early years but he firmly supported Wang Shizhen afterwards. Because he was thought that Wang shizhen was an author who is totally different from his co-writers, and in the late years, Qian Qianyi proposed An established opinion of Yanzhou`s later years 감州晩年定論. Kim Changhyup knew this fact from reading The biographies in Liechao shiji 『列朝詩集小傳』 and Youxueji 『有學集』 written by Qian Qianyi, but he undermined and passed over this compliment to Wang shizhen`s work, for blocking out Wang`s influence in Chosun literary circles. To tell the truth, An established opinion of Yanzhou`s later years 감州晩年定論 of Qian Qianyi also was not fully understand the substance of Wang`s literature. It was only Qian Qianyi represented his own views about Wang shizhen`s literature. He maintained his opinion that Wang shizhen`s literature in the early and later years was different considerly. But according to the research of this article, it is not truth. By comparing the viewpoint of two masters with the works of Wang`s, This article showed that their opinion did not gives the facts correctly, besides Qian Qianyi had changed his own statement about Wang Shizhen. So I hope to pursuing an study about Wang Shizhen not based on the critical statement of his literary opponent but based on his own original text.