RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조선 세조대 ‘女眞 和解事’에 대한 연구 - 申叔舟의 파견을 중심으로 - = The “Jurchen Reconciliation” during the Reign of King Sejo: Focusing on the Dispatch of Shin Sukju

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103684812

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Uryangkhad (兀良合) and the Odoli (斡朶里) moved southward to the current Southern Manchurian area to escape from the invasion of Oljeokhap (兀狄合). Since that, time conflict and struggle were repeated. The representative event of this conflict and struggle was the defeat of Tong Monqke Temur (童猛哥帖木兒), the head of the Odoli.
    The conflict sometimes caused a movement of reconciliation, but during the reign of King Sejong (世宗), it was decided to disperse power and to divide the Jurchen to be more helpful in the defense of the six commanderies rather than to seek reconciliation or integration. The Joseon’s policy began to change along with the reign of King Sejo (世祖). He stressed the legitimacy of the enthronement by noting the so called “heavenly calling,” which was also stressed in his diplomacy. King Sejo promoted the “Jurchen Reconciliation” (女眞 和解事) by dispatching Shin Sukju (申叔舟). This was made by boasting of the newly established power’s legitimacy even though it was caused by the conflicts between the Jurchens.
    Shin supervised the “Jurchen Reconciliation” in the six commanderies in Hamgil Province (咸吉道) for 80 days. First, he visited the five commanderies near the Tumen River in person and attracted that participation of various chiefs of the Odoli and the Uryangkhad. In the next place, he sent the intention of King Sejo to Uryangkhad leaders (諸種兀狄哈) in a translated into the Jurchen language. When he sent that letter, he used chiefs who had deep relations with Joseon.
    Finally, he attempted to get compassion from those leaders by giving a cordial reception of wives and children of captured Uryangkhad. Finally,the “Jurchen Reconciliation” was successful due to the participation of the Uryangkhad. However, Ming China objected to the diplomatic relations of the Jurchens of the three commanderies in Jianzhou (建州三衛) with Joseon, and the fact that Nangpaeahan (浪孛兒罕), a supporter of Joseon, interfered in the reconciliation and betrayed Joseon transformed the relations between Joseon and Ming China and the Jurchen. Joseon accepted the request of Ming China regarding the Geonjusamui of Amnok River and declared not to make a communication with them. However, Joseon beheaded the family of Nangbalahan in Amnok River. Although Ming raised the issue of the punishment of Nangpaeahan, Joseon tried to conquer the Moryeonui (毛憐衛).
    Accordingly, Joseon’s recognition of the Amnok River and the Tuman River basin seemed different. Such recognition took place right after the foundation of Joseon. Since then, it was linked to Gongheomjin (公險眞), which Yun Gwan (尹瓘) of Goryeo had opened after the dispute with Ming China regarding the naming of Jurchen groups. And Joseon had in mind that the north of Tuman river basin,unlike the Amnok River basin, could be incorporated into Joseon’s territory by installing a commandery directly. Thus, the Jurchen in the adjacent areas of The six commanderies north of Tuman River basin intended to comply with the regulations and instructions of Joseon.
    While the Jurchen Reconciliation during King Sejo’s reign was executed to bring stability in the Tuman river basin, it was conducted under this recognition and background.
    번역하기

    The Uryangkhad (兀良合) and the Odoli (斡朶里) moved southward to the current Southern Manchurian area to escape from the invasion of Oljeokhap (兀狄合). Since that, time conflict and struggle were repeated. The representative event of this c...

    The Uryangkhad (兀良合) and the Odoli (斡朶里) moved southward to the current Southern Manchurian area to escape from the invasion of Oljeokhap (兀狄合). Since that, time conflict and struggle were repeated. The representative event of this conflict and struggle was the defeat of Tong Monqke Temur (童猛哥帖木兒), the head of the Odoli.
    The conflict sometimes caused a movement of reconciliation, but during the reign of King Sejong (世宗), it was decided to disperse power and to divide the Jurchen to be more helpful in the defense of the six commanderies rather than to seek reconciliation or integration. The Joseon’s policy began to change along with the reign of King Sejo (世祖). He stressed the legitimacy of the enthronement by noting the so called “heavenly calling,” which was also stressed in his diplomacy. King Sejo promoted the “Jurchen Reconciliation” (女眞 和解事) by dispatching Shin Sukju (申叔舟). This was made by boasting of the newly established power’s legitimacy even though it was caused by the conflicts between the Jurchens.
    Shin supervised the “Jurchen Reconciliation” in the six commanderies in Hamgil Province (咸吉道) for 80 days. First, he visited the five commanderies near the Tumen River in person and attracted that participation of various chiefs of the Odoli and the Uryangkhad. In the next place, he sent the intention of King Sejo to Uryangkhad leaders (諸種兀狄哈) in a translated into the Jurchen language. When he sent that letter, he used chiefs who had deep relations with Joseon.
    Finally, he attempted to get compassion from those leaders by giving a cordial reception of wives and children of captured Uryangkhad. Finally,the “Jurchen Reconciliation” was successful due to the participation of the Uryangkhad. However, Ming China objected to the diplomatic relations of the Jurchens of the three commanderies in Jianzhou (建州三衛) with Joseon, and the fact that Nangpaeahan (浪孛兒罕), a supporter of Joseon, interfered in the reconciliation and betrayed Joseon transformed the relations between Joseon and Ming China and the Jurchen. Joseon accepted the request of Ming China regarding the Geonjusamui of Amnok River and declared not to make a communication with them. However, Joseon beheaded the family of Nangbalahan in Amnok River. Although Ming raised the issue of the punishment of Nangpaeahan, Joseon tried to conquer the Moryeonui (毛憐衛).
    Accordingly, Joseon’s recognition of the Amnok River and the Tuman River basin seemed different. Such recognition took place right after the foundation of Joseon. Since then, it was linked to Gongheomjin (公險眞), which Yun Gwan (尹瓘) of Goryeo had opened after the dispute with Ming China regarding the naming of Jurchen groups. And Joseon had in mind that the north of Tuman river basin,unlike the Amnok River basin, could be incorporated into Joseon’s territory by installing a commandery directly. Thus, the Jurchen in the adjacent areas of The six commanderies north of Tuman River basin intended to comply with the regulations and instructions of Joseon.
    While the Jurchen Reconciliation during King Sejo’s reign was executed to bring stability in the Tuman river basin, it was conducted under this recognition and background.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "태종실록"

    2 "태조실록"

    3 유재춘, "중・근세 韓・中間 국경완충지대의 형성과 경계인식 -14세기~15세기를 중심으로-" 한일관계사학회 (39) : 159-204, 2011

    4 한성주, "조선전기 두만강유역 ‘女眞 藩籬・藩胡’의 형성과 성격" 고려사학회 (41) : 163-201, 2010

    5 한성주, "조선 세조대 毛憐衛 征伐과 여진인의 從軍에 대하여" 22 (22): 2008

    6 김순남, "조선 成宗代 兀狄哈에 대하여" 조선시대사학회 (49) : 35-63, 2009

    7 "세종실록"

    8 "세조실록"

    9 박정민, "세조대의 여진관계와 정책 -여진인 來朝를 중심으로-" 한국사연구회 (151) : 103-135, 2010

    10 황선희, "세조 초기의 여진관계와 북정" 서강대학교 대학원 2007

    1 "태종실록"

    2 "태조실록"

    3 유재춘, "중・근세 韓・中間 국경완충지대의 형성과 경계인식 -14세기~15세기를 중심으로-" 한일관계사학회 (39) : 159-204, 2011

    4 한성주, "조선전기 두만강유역 ‘女眞 藩籬・藩胡’의 형성과 성격" 고려사학회 (41) : 163-201, 2010

    5 한성주, "조선 세조대 毛憐衛 征伐과 여진인의 從軍에 대하여" 22 (22): 2008

    6 김순남, "조선 成宗代 兀狄哈에 대하여" 조선시대사학회 (49) : 35-63, 2009

    7 "세종실록"

    8 "세조실록"

    9 박정민, "세조대의 여진관계와 정책 -여진인 來朝를 중심으로-" 한국사연구회 (151) : 103-135, 2010

    10 황선희, "세조 초기의 여진관계와 북정" 서강대학교 대학원 2007

    11 서인범, "명대의 遼東都司와 東寧衛" 명청사학회 (23) : 97-122, 2005

    12 남의현, "명대요동지배정책연구" 강원대출판부 2008

    13 남의현, "명대 요동도사 지배의 한계에 관한 연구" 강원대학교 대학원 2006

    14 한성주, "두만강지역 여진인 동향 보고서의 분석-『端宗實錄』기사를 중심으로-" 한국사학회 (86) : 39-97, 2007

    15 "단종실록"

    16 "고려사"

    17 "龍飛御天歌"

    18 김구진, "骨看 兀狄哈 女眞 硏究" 1976

    19 김구진, "驪末鮮初 豆滿江 流域의 女眞 分布" 15 : 1973

    20 王冬芳, "關于明代中朝邊界形成的硏究" 3 : 1997

    21 建文, "論明代對東疆地區的管轄問題" 2 : 1995

    22 서병국, "童猛哥帖木兒의 建州左衛硏究" 11 : 1971

    23 이인영, "申叔舟의 北征, In 韓國滿洲關係史의 硏究" 을유문화사 1954

    24 河內良弘, "申叔舟の女眞出兵" 71 : 1974

    25 유봉영, "王朝實錄에 나타난 李朝前期의 野人" 14 : 1973

    26 김태영, "朝鮮초기 世祖王權의 專制性에 대한 一考察" 87 : 1994

    27 강성문, "朝鮮시대 女眞征伐에 관한 연구" 국방부 군사편찬연구소 18 : 1989

    28 高橋公明, "朝鮮遣使ブ-ムと世祖の王權, In 日本前近代の國家と對外關係" 吉川弘文館 1987

    29 ケネス·R·ロビンソン, "朝鮮王朝-受職女眞人の關係と‘朝鮮’" 592 : 1999

    30 王臻, "朝鮮前期與明建州女眞關係硏究" 中國文史出版社 2005

    31 한성주, "朝鮮前期 ‘字小’에 대한 고찰-對馬島 倭人 및 女眞 勢力을 중심으로-" 한일관계사학회 (33) : 203-236, 2009

    32 한성주, "朝鮮初期 朝 明 二重受職女眞人의 兩屬問題" 조선시대사학회 40 (40): 5-44, 2007

    33 河內良弘, "朝鮮世祖の字小主義とその挫折, In 明代女眞史の硏究" 同朋舍 1992

    34 中村榮孝, "朝鮮世祖の圜丘壇祭祀について(上)" 54 : 1970

    35 한형주, "朝鮮 世祖代의 祭天禮에 대한 硏究-太·世宗代 祭天禮와의 비교 검토를 중심으로" 81 : 1996

    36 김상태, "朝鮮 世祖代의 圜丘壇 復設과 그 性格" 6 (6): 1996

    37 "明英宗實錄"

    38 "明太宗實錄"

    39 박원호, "明初朝鮮關係史硏究" 일조각 2002

    40 姜龍範, "明代中朝關系史" 黑龍江朝鮮民族出版社 1999

    41 남의현, "明代 兀良哈·女眞의 成長과 遼東都司의 危機" 3 : 2005

    42 박원호, "宣德年間(1425~1435) 明과 朝鮮間의 建州女眞" 85 : 1992

    43 "大明會典"

    44 "大明一統志"

    45 김구진, "吾音會의 斡朶里 女眞에 對한 硏究" 17 (17): 1973

    46 "北征錄"

    47 조영록, "入關前 明·鮮時代의 滿洲女眞史" 22 : 1977

    48 "元史"

    49 ケネス·R·ロビンソン, "一四五五年三月の人名記錄にみる朝鮮王朝の受職野人" 6 : 1997

    50 송기중, "《太祖實錄》에 등장하는 蒙古語名과 女眞語名(Ⅱ)" 73 : 1992

    51 김순남, "16세기 조선과 野人 사이의 모피 교역의 전개" 한국사연구회 (152) : 71-108, 2011

    52 金九鎭, "13C~17C女眞 社會의 硏究: 金 滅亡 以後 淸 建國 以前까지 女眞社會의 組織을 中心으로" 高麗大學校 大學院 1989

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.18 1.18 1.19
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.06 0.98 2.155 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼