RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    개인투자자의 심리회계 = 통합및 분리매도를 통한 손익실현의 차별화 현상

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856472

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines whether the trading behavior of individual investors in the Korean stock market follows prospect theory’s mental accounting principles. Our results show that individual investors’selling decisions generally conform the mental accounting principles.Tvesky and Kahneman(1981) proposed prospect theory as an alternative theory of decision- making behavior under risk. They suggests that risk preferences are domain-specific; that is, latent risk preferences translate into differing manifest risk preferences according to the context. Domain-specific risk preference can be understood as a manifest psychological variable that may well be the result of the combination of latent risk propensity and the situation, such as trading gains and losses in stock investments.Thaler(1985) suggests four mental accounting principles driven from the value function of the prospect theory; segregation of gains, integration of losses, integration of smaller losses with larger gains, segregation of smaller gains(silver linings) from larger losses. Lim(2005) focused on the first two of them, integration of losses and segregation of gains. The other two principles for mixed outcomes have been neglected. We examines all four principles of hedonic framing using trading records of individual investors at a medium-sized discount brokerage firm. Our results confirm that individual investors in the Korean stock market are subject to the mental accounting effect. Our results also suggest a critical value driven from a simple analytical model is more appropriate as a reference point in combining gains and losses than the breakeven point generally suggested by the extant literature.This study contributes to the extant literature in two ways. First, we provide empirical evidence on the mental accounting effect in mixed outcomes. Considering trading outcomes are often mixed in the real world stock market, our finding is a meaningful extension of Lim(2005). Second, we derive a critical value from prospect theory’s value function and dichotomize mixed outcomes into segregation and integration regions. This is the first attempt to refine the general principles of mental accounting in a specific form. While the disposition effect, selling winners too early and holding losers too long, can be regarded as the main effect of individuals’asymmetric decisions for their winners and losers, the mental accounting effect can be regarded as the interaction effect of those. While the disposition effect can be regarded as the time-series asymmetry of selling decisions for winners and losers, the mental accounting effect can be regarded as the cross-sectional asymmetry of those. As such we can have better understandings of psychological under-pinnings in individuals’selling decisions for winners and losers.
    번역하기

    This study examines whether the trading behavior of individual investors in the Korean stock market follows prospect theory’s mental accounting principles. Our results show that individual investors’selling decisions generally conform the mental a...

    This study examines whether the trading behavior of individual investors in the Korean stock market follows prospect theory’s mental accounting principles. Our results show that individual investors’selling decisions generally conform the mental accounting principles.Tvesky and Kahneman(1981) proposed prospect theory as an alternative theory of decision- making behavior under risk. They suggests that risk preferences are domain-specific; that is, latent risk preferences translate into differing manifest risk preferences according to the context. Domain-specific risk preference can be understood as a manifest psychological variable that may well be the result of the combination of latent risk propensity and the situation, such as trading gains and losses in stock investments.Thaler(1985) suggests four mental accounting principles driven from the value function of the prospect theory; segregation of gains, integration of losses, integration of smaller losses with larger gains, segregation of smaller gains(silver linings) from larger losses. Lim(2005) focused on the first two of them, integration of losses and segregation of gains. The other two principles for mixed outcomes have been neglected. We examines all four principles of hedonic framing using trading records of individual investors at a medium-sized discount brokerage firm. Our results confirm that individual investors in the Korean stock market are subject to the mental accounting effect. Our results also suggest a critical value driven from a simple analytical model is more appropriate as a reference point in combining gains and losses than the breakeven point generally suggested by the extant literature.This study contributes to the extant literature in two ways. First, we provide empirical evidence on the mental accounting effect in mixed outcomes. Considering trading outcomes are often mixed in the real world stock market, our finding is a meaningful extension of Lim(2005). Second, we derive a critical value from prospect theory’s value function and dichotomize mixed outcomes into segregation and integration regions. This is the first attempt to refine the general principles of mental accounting in a specific form. While the disposition effect, selling winners too early and holding losers too long, can be regarded as the main effect of individuals’asymmetric decisions for their winners and losers, the mental accounting effect can be regarded as the interaction effect of those. While the disposition effect can be regarded as the time-series asymmetry of selling decisions for winners and losers, the mental accounting effect can be regarded as the cross-sectional asymmetry of those. As such we can have better understandings of psychological under-pinnings in individuals’selling decisions for winners and losers.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "회피현상과 개인투자자들의 매도행태" 603-630,

    2 "프로스펙트이론의 손실" 2005

    3 "주요 경제 및 증시통계" (123) : 2005

    4 "Volume for Winners and Losers Taxation and Other Motives for Stock Trading Journal of Finance" 951-974, 1986

    5 "The Quarterly Journal of Economics" Kahneman 1039-1061, 1991

    6 "The In-vestment Behaviour and Performance of Various Investor Types: A Study of Fin- land’s Unique Data Set" 55 : 43-67, 2000

    7 "The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice" Kahneman 453-458, 1981

    8 "The Disposition to Sel Winers To Early and Ride Losers Too Long Journal of Finance" 777-790, 1985

    9 "Prospect Theory and Asset Prices" 116 : 1-53, 2001

    10 "Mental Acounting, Los Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns" 56 : 1246-1292, 2001

    1 "회피현상과 개인투자자들의 매도행태" 603-630,

    2 "프로스펙트이론의 손실" 2005

    3 "주요 경제 및 증시통계" (123) : 2005

    4 "Volume for Winners and Losers Taxation and Other Motives for Stock Trading Journal of Finance" 951-974, 1986

    5 "The Quarterly Journal of Economics" Kahneman 1039-1061, 1991

    6 "The In-vestment Behaviour and Performance of Various Investor Types: A Study of Fin- land’s Unique Data Set" 55 : 43-67, 2000

    7 "The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice" Kahneman 453-458, 1981

    8 "The Disposition to Sel Winers To Early and Ride Losers Too Long Journal of Finance" 777-790, 1985

    9 "Prospect Theory and Asset Prices" 116 : 1-53, 2001

    10 "Mental Acounting, Los Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns" 56 : 1246-1292, 2001

    11 "Journal of Behavioral Decision Making" 1985183-206

    12 "Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even The Efect of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice" 643-660, 1990

    13 "Explaining Inestor Preference for Cash Dividends Journal of Financial Economics" 23-282, 1985

    14 "Do Investors Integrate Loses and Segregate Gains? Mental Accounting and Investor Trading Decisions" forthcoming 2005

    15 "Cumulative Represen-tation of Uncertainty Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Asymetric Realization of Gains and LossesDong Chul Kim* Won-Wook Choi*Jai Wan Park*** Yoon Jong Lee**" Kahneman 297-323, 1992

    16 "Biases in Beting" 883-888, 1985

    17 "Asymetric Corela-tions of Equity Porfolios" 63 : 443-494, 2002

    18 "Are Investor’s Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?" 53 : 1775-1798, 1998

    19 "An Analysis of Decision Under Risk" Kahneman eco (eco): 263-291, 1979

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼