한국인 L2화자의 여격 구문 인식에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper was based on the GBN (Given-Before-New)principle; a definite noun phrase is considered to have a given information so it should be in front of the indefinite noun phrase. Korean L2 learners, however, can’t recognize this theory so they don’t appreciate the different meanings of the two dative constructions(double object construction and the prepositional dative construction) in the context and they don’t have any perception like L1 speakers. That’s because Korean L2 learners studied that two dative constructions are alike. so this paper would like to motivate to find more effective way to understand two dative constructions.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
• Ⅲ. 연구 방법
• Ⅳ. 연구 결과 분석
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 인용문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Givon, T, "qMind, code, and context: Essays in pragmatics" Laurence Erlbaum 1989

2 Levin, B, "Verb and Constructions" University of Southern California 2004

3 Givon, T, "Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations" Academic Press 151-182, 1984

4 Fuller, J, "Topic- Prominance in Interlanguage" 37 : 1-18, 1987

5 Cowan, R, "The Teacher’s Grammar of English: A Course Book and Reference Guide" Cambridge University Press 2008

6 Wierzbicka, A, "The Semantics of Grammar" John Benjamins Publishing Company 1988

7 Carroll, M, "The Relecance of Information Organization to Second Language Acquisition Studies: The Descriptive Discourse of Advanced Adult Learners of German Studies" 22 : 441-466, 2000

8 Synder, K, "The Relationship between Form and Function in Ditransitive Constructions" University of Pennsylvania 2003

9 Marefat, H, "The Impact of Information Structure as a Discourse Factor on The Acquisition of Dative Alternation by L2 Learner" 59 (59): 66-82, 2005

10 Arnold, E, "The Effect of Structural Complexity and Discourse Status" 76 : 28-55, 2000

11 Mazurkewich, I, "The Acquisition of the Dative Alternation by Second Language Learners and Linguistic Theory" 34 (34): 91-108, 1984

12 Berwick, R, "The Acquisition Syntactic of Knowledge" MlT Press 1985

13 Givon, T, "Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax" Academic Press 1979

14 Creidier, C, "Syntax and Semantics" 3-22, 1979

15 박분주, "Structure Persistence in L1 and L2 Production of English Dative Structure" 언어과학회 (46) : 127-143, 2008

16 Clifton, Jr., C, "Should Given Information Appear Before New" 32 : 886-895, 2004

17 Green, G, "Semantics and Syntactic Regularity" Indiana University Press 1974

18 Krifka, Manfred, "Semantic and Pragmatic conditions for the Dative Alternation" 한국영어학회 4 (4): 1-31, 2004

19 Bresnan, J, "Reality Exploration and Discovery: Pattern Interaction in Language and Life" CSLI 161-184, 2009

20 Prince, E, "Radical Pragmatics" Academic Press 223-254, 1981

21 Clark, H, "Psychology and Language" Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich 1977

22 Wasow, T, "Postverbal Behavior" CSLI Publications 2002

23 Bresnan, J, "On the Gradience of The Dative Alternation" Stanford University 2003

24 Larson, R, "On the Double Object Construction" 19 (19): 35-391, 1988

25 Prince, E, "Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications" Cambridge University Press 1988

26 최혜원, "Length and Order: A Corpus Study of Korean Dative-Accusative Construction" 담화·인지언어학회 14 (14): 207-227, 2007

27 Lee, D.-H, "Learning of English Dative Structures by Korean College Students and the Operation of Learning Principles" 55 (55): 331-350, 2000

28 Pinker, S, "Learnability and Cognition: The Aquisition of Argument Structure" MIT Press 1989

29 Rutherford, W, "Language Transfer in Language Learning" Newbury House 358-371, 1983

30 Stevens, J, "Information Structure, Grammar and Strategy in Discourse" University of Pennsylvania 2013

31 Lambrecht, K, "Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents" Cambridge University Press 1994

32 Gundel, K, "Information Structure and Referential Giveness / Newness: How Much Belongs in Grammar" CSLI Publications 2003

33 Shin, K.-Y, "Iconicity-theoretic and Corpus-Based Analysis on the Asymmetrical Dative Constructions of English" University of Yonsei 2003

34 Kim, H.-S, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 10" 76-83, 2004

35 Allerton, D, "Generating Indirect Object in English" 14 (14): 21-33, 1978

36 Levin, B, "English Verb Classes and Alternations" University of Chicago Press 1993

37 Conwell, E, "Early Syntactic Productivity: Evidence from Dative Shift" 103 : 163-179, 2007

38 Erteschik-Shir, N, "Discourse and Syntax (Syntax and Semantics 12)" Academic Press 441-447, 1979

39 Clark, H, "Discourse Production and Comprehension" 1 : 1-40, 1977

40 Goldberg, A, "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" The University of Chicago Press 1995

41 Callies, M, "Argument Realisation, Information Status and Syntactic Weight–A Learner Corpus Study of The Dative Alternation" Niemeyer 2008

42 Yeo, I.-K, "A Study on the Preference for English Dative Alternations and the Learnability of Korean Students" Korea National University of Education 2012

43 Kwon, Y.-S, "A Study on the Asymmetrical Dative Constructions of English on the Basis of the Principle of End Weight" Korea National University of Education 2013

44 Bresnan, J, "A Few Lessons from Typology" 11 (11): 2007