과세자주권 확대방안 연구: 탄력세율제 활용의 한계를 중심으로 = A Study on Extension of the Autonomous Right to Tax: Focusing on the Limit of Utilization of Flexible Tax Rate

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to find ways to expand the autonomous right to tax of local governments. To do this, we grasped the types of the autonomous right to tax, the permissible scope, and actual conditions of the rights. The Autonomous right to tax can be divided into decision of tax items, tax rates and standard of assessments.
In the Korean Constitution, tax items and tax rate are decided by law. Therefore, in principle, there is no guarantee the rights of tax items and tax rates. In addition, since the taxation standard is determined in advance by various laws, the determination of the standard of assessment is not guaranteed either. This is because it is based on the ratio of self-financing such as local grant taxes, nation subsidies, mediation grants, and the upper autonomy subsidies. In other words, local governments do not have the incentive to expand the local tax rate by utilizing the flexible tax rate system.
Policy implications for the autonomous right to tax are proposed in two aspects. First, if the constitutional amendment is not considered, it is a measure to guarantee the right to decide the tax rate using the flexible tax rate system. For this, the local financial structure should be shifted from the dependent resources to the self-funded ones, and the financial transfer system should be operated in accordance with the principles. Second, if the amendment of the Constitution is to be implemented, local tax preference should be adopted in order to allow local autonomy in establishing national tax and local tax.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김철수, "헌법학신론" 박영사 2013

2 홍성방, "헌법학" 법문사 2006

3 성낙인, "헌법학" 법문사 2014

4 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2012

5 최천규, "한･일 지방자치단체의 과세자주권 비교와 그 시사점: 법정외세를 중심으로" 22 : 49-58, 2011

6 전광석, "한국헌법론" 집현재 2014

7 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2018

8 남황우, "표준세율제도의 보완에 관한 연구" 한국지방재정학회 7 (7): 31-52, 2002

9 임상수, "탄력세율 활용이 보통교부세에 미치는 영향" 한국지방행정연구원 29 (29): 137-160, 2015

10 주만수, "지방정부의 과세자주권 및 지방세제의 가격기능 강화" 한국재정학회 1 (1): 105-133, 2008

11 김태호, "지방정부의 과세자주권 강화를 위한 지방세 관련법 개편방안" 한국지방세연구원 2014

12 이관행, "지방자치와 자치권에 관한 고찰" 비교법학연구소 24 : 181-209, 2007

13 김완석, "지방자치와 과세자주권:과세자주권의 문제점과 발전방향" 2004 (2004): 26-47, 2004

14 차상붕, "지방자치단체의 과세자주권 확대를 위한 법리적 고찰" 1 (1): 133-163, 2001

15 이세진, "지방세의 현황과 과제" 국회예산정책처 2011

16 김영오, "지방세법상 탄력세율제 활용에 관한 연구" 한국지방정부학회 12 (12): 195-214, 2008

17 최원구, "지방세 탄력세율 활용에 관한 연구:한일 지방세 탄력세율 운영현황 비교분석을 중심으로" 한국지방세연구원 2018

18 이전오, "과세자주권의 확대방안에 관한 연구" 한국토지공법학회 37 (37): 349-372, 2007

19 김대영, "과세자주권 확충에 관한 소고" 5 (5): 61-86, 2000

20 Blöchliger, H., "The Fiscal Autonomy of Sub-Central Governemts:an update" OECD Publishing 2009

21 OECD, "Tax Statistics"

22 Jounard, Isabelle, "Fiscal Relations across Government Levels" OECD Economic Deparment 2003