임진왜란과 강화교섭 - 쓰시마번과 고니시 유키나가를 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Imjin war outbroken by structural paradox of Hideyoshi regime had a characteristic that war had to be continued until the paradox is solved. Invasion, also, related with the peace and power of Hideyoshi regime. The paradox of regime is phrased as an unrest of commanding and internal conflict of Japanese military. The peace and power of Hideyoshi regime is highly related with conditions of pacification. Bargaining between Chosun and Tsushima before the invasion was only had an intention to dispacth of diplomat(Tong-sin-sa) and it was far from idea of Hideyoshi. In addition, Chosun wanted to get cause of negotiation rather than grasp the meaning of bargaining. In other side, Hideyoshi required passage for invasion to Ming dynasty. This ended Chosun-Japan relationship and triggered Invasion in 1592. Connected with it's east-asia strategy, Ming sent troops to Chosun and it was ultimately aimed at block the invasion of Japan in Korea Peninsula. Thus, Bargaings of Chosun-Japan and Ming-Japan in Imjin war time were peace treaty without peace significantly related with contemporary warfare. Theme of yip-cho and the cession of Chosun's four province were unchanged while the logic of Chosun-Japan treaty changed along with the alteration of war state. Japan, also, wanted to separate the negotiation with Chosun and Ming. With this rule, Japan pressed Chosun with result of Ming-Japan treaty. On the other side, Ming forced Chosun to sign the mutual agreement with Japan for the purpose of withdraw the Japanese military in Korea Peninsula and longed for investiture of Japan. It is good to evaluate that negotiation between Ming and Japan was effective in terms of stopping the battle temporarily. Though, It was not enough for the end of war. In other words, It was not suitable for strategy that aims at sustaining an international order among three east-asian countries while casting a long shadow to Ming's east-asia strategy. Additionally, Chosun had no choice but to led by Ming because the dynasty limited Chosun's right to command and diplomatic power. In the end, negotiation of Chosun-Ming, Chosun-Japan resulted in failure coincide with Hideyoshi's investiture by Ming dynasty. Therefore, Jungyu war(1597) began. In this time, there were widespread concerns of war in Japan and with Ming's deeper in, Japan devoted itself to defend against Ming stationed at south coast retreated. The commader of Japan also gave much effort to disengage the troops by the peace treaty after Hideyoshi's death. Generals were positive to withdrawal negotiation, Chosun had no means to deal with. Since this 7-years long Imjin war triggered by paradox of structure of Hideyoshi regime=daimyo coalition government, Chosun-Japan relation diplomacy get settled down after Tokugawa Ieyasu got overwhelming military power over Daimyo resulted from winning in Sekigihara battle.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 조선침략 계획기
• Ⅲ. 임진왜란기
• Ⅳ. 정유재란기
• Ⅴ. 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• 논문초록

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 武田勝蔵, "｢伯爵宗家所藏豊公｣文書と朝鮮陣" 4 (4): 1925

2 이민웅, "임진왜런과 동아시아 전략, In 동아시아 세계와 임진왜란" 京仁文化社 2010

3 김문자, "임진왜란기의 조일관계, In 동아시아 세계와 임진왜란" 京仁文化社 2010

4 김문자, "임진왜란기의 강화교섭과 加藤淸正 -조선왕자의 送還문제를 중심으로-" 한일관계사학회 (42) : 383-416, 2012

5 김문자, "임진왜란기 일·명 강화교섭의 파탄에 관한 一考察: 사명당(松雲大師)·加藤淸正 간의 회담을 중심으로" 한국학중앙연구원 28 (28): 225-254, 2005

6 이계황, "역사 속의 한일관계" 동북아역사재단 2009

7 윤유숙, "도요토미 히데요시의 조선침략 발발전 한일교섭 실태" 한국일본학회 0 (0): 347-362, 2007

8 "黒田家譜" 文献出版 1983

9 北島万次, "豊臣秀吉の朝鮮侵略" 吉川弘文舘 1995

10 田中敏昭, "豊臣政權의 日本統合과 對馬島主 宗氏의 朝鮮交涉" 5-5, 1999

11 金文子, "豊臣政権期の日․明和議交渉と朝鮮" 37-37, 1993

12 "西征日記, In 続々群書類従" 続群書類従完成会 1970

13 中野等, "秀吉の軍令と大陸侵略" 吉川弘文舘 2006

14 岩沢愿彦, "秀吉の唐入りに関する文書" 163-, 1962

15 佐島顕子, "秀よりの｢唐入り｣構造の挫折と小西行長の講話交渉, In 福岡女学院大学紀要人文学部編"

16 "神宗實錄"

17 金誠一, "海槎錄" 민족문화추진위원회 1 : 1975

18 "浅野家文書"

19 "毛利家文書"

20 山内弘一, "李朝初期における対明自尊の意識" 92-92, 1979

21 민덕기, "朝日 國交 재개교섭에 나타난 朝․明․日의 입장과 대응, In 동아시아 세계와 임진왜란" 京仁文化社 2010

22 黃愼, "日本往還日記" 민족문화추진위원회 8 : 1977

23 佐島顕子, "日明講和交渉における朝鮮撤退問題, In 鎖国と国際関係" 吉川弘文舘 1997

24 李啓煌, "文禄․慶長の役と東アジア" 臨川書店 1997

25 中野等, "文禄․慶長の役" 吉川弘文舘 2008

26 李啓煌, "慶長の役の最末期における"丁応泰誣奏事件"と日․明将らの講和交渉" 389-389, 1995

27 "島津家文書"

28 "小早川家文書"

29 "宣祖實錄"

30 "宣祖修正實錄"

31 노영구, "壬辰倭亂의 學說史的 검토, In 동아시아 세계와 임진왜란" 京仁文化社 2010

32 한문종, "壬辰倭亂 직전의 국내정세와 韓日關係" 인문과학연구소 (21) : 223-243, 2009

33 佐島顕子, "壬辰倭乱講和の破綻をめぐって" 九州大朝鮮学研究所 1994

34 "壬辰之役史料匯輯. 上" 新華書店 1990

35 李敏昊, "壬亂과 朝․中․日의 外交交涉, In 壬亂水軍活動硏究論集" 海軍軍事硏究室 1993

36 跡部信, "史料紹介"宇都宮高麗帰陣軍記物語" 2-2, 1998

37 "中外経緯伝, In 改定史籍集覧" 臨川書店 1984

38 村上直次郎訳, "イエズス会日本年報, In 下(新異国叢書4)" 雄松堂書店 1969

39 "『高山公実録』上" 上野市古文献刊行会 1998